La vendita allo scoperto per SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF dà agli investitori un'idea del grado in cui gli investitori stanno scommettendo sul declino delle azioni di SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF. I dati relativi alle vendite allo scoperto vengono aggiornati ogni due settimane.

SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (NASDAQ:FCTE), Report sulle vendite allo scoperto

Technology

Industrials

Other

Consumer Cyclical

Consumer Defensive

Healthcare

Financial Services

Basic Materials

The Fund is actively managed and typically owns 20 domestic stocks that are normally included in the S&P 500 Index (S&P 500). The stocks are chosen using a Full-Cycle Trend (FCT) strategy developed by an affiliate of the Adviser, 3Fourteen Research, LLC (3Fourteen). The FCT strategy is based on a proprietary model developed by 3Fourteen that selects stocks based on quality stock screens and trend factors such as return on capital and cash flow stability, earnings growth, return on investment, momentum, linear regression and trend analysis.

Philip Morris International

NVIDIA Corporation

Brown & Brown Inc

Apple Inc

Oracle Corp.

Cintas Corp

Trane Technologies Plc

3m Co.

Colgate-Palmolive Co

Amphenol Corp. - Cl A

Marketaxess Holdings Inc.

Leidos Holdings Inc

Waters Corp

Lockheed Martin Corp

Nvr Inc.

Alphabet Inc-cl A

Air Products & Chemicals

WW Grainger Inc

Resmed Inc.

Deckers Outdoor Corp

Anet- Arista Networks Inc Com Shs

Fair Isaac Corp

F5 Inc

Msci Inc

Meta Platforms Inc

Lululemon Athletica, Inc

Accenture Plc-Cl A

Costco Wholesale Corp

SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF

Close-,Up,Of,Computer,Chip,With,Ai,Sign.,Artificial,Intelligence.

Equities

Large Cap

News

Tech

DELL

FCTE

Trust for Professional Managers Jensen Quality Growth ETF

JGRW

NVDA

Una nuova alleanza tecnologica sta accelerando l&#39;adozione dell&#39;intelligenza artificiale, con impatti significativi sul settore enterprise.

Accenture, Dell e NVIDIA: la partnership che ridefinisce l&#39;IA aziendale

Middlesex Water Company (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSEX#NASDAQ">MSEX</a>), a provider of life-sustaining water and wastewater utility services, announced that its Board of Directors has named Nadine Leslie as Chair of the Board. Leslie, who currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer, succeeds Dennis W. Doll, who retired from the Board following a 20-year tenure with the company.
The Board also named Amy Mansue to serve as its Lead Independent Director, a role established to further support the Board's independence and strengthen governance oversight.

Management

MSEX

Middlesex Water Company Names President And CEO Nadine Leslie As Chair Of The Board, Succeeding Dennis W. Doll

General

Jayud Global Logistics Receives Nasdaq Letter Regarding Minimum Bid Price Deficiency

Plus Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PSTV#NASDAQ">PSTV</a>) (the "Company") today announced it received a delinquency notification letter from Nasdaq on May 21, 2025, which indicated that the Company was not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) as a result of the delayed filing of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2025 (the "Quarterly Report"). The Nasdaq Listing Rule requires listed companies to timely file all required periodic financial reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). This notification has no immediate effect on the listing of the Company's securities on Nasdaq.
Nasdaq has informed the Company that it must submit a plan to regain compliance with respect to the filing requirement by July 21, 2025. If the plan is accepted, Nasdaq can grant an exception of up to 180 calendar dates from the due date of the filing, or until November 17, 2025, to regain compliance.
The Company is working diligently to file the Quarterly Report as promptly as practical, and expects to return to a normal filing cadence for the remainder of 2025.

PSTV

Plus Therapeutics Receives Nasdaq Delinquency Notice Over Late Form 10-Q Submission

Transaction Expected to Close in Q3 2025
SatixFy Communications Ltd. ("SatixFy" or the "Company") (NYSE:<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SATX#NYSE">SATX</a>), today announced that at a special meeting of shareholders (the "Meeting") on May 23, 2025, holders of the majority of outstanding ordinary shares of SatixFy voted to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with MDA Space Ltd. ("MDA Space"), as amended and announced on May 20, 2025, pursuant to which MDA Space agreed to acquire SatixFy in an all-cash transaction (the "Merger").
Over 99% of the Company's outstanding ordinary shares that were voted at the Meeting in person or by proxy were voted in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and the Merger.

SatixFy Communications Ltd. Ordinary Share

SATX

SatixFy Shareholders Approve Proposed Acquisition By MDA Space; Transaction Expected To Close In Q3 2025

PLRZ

Polyrizon Receives Nasdaq Delisting Notice

Oracle (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ORCL#NYSE">ORCL</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 10.07% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 24.2%. Currently, Oracle has a market capitalization of $437.38 billion. 
Buying $100 In ORCL: If an investor had bought $100 of ORCL stock 5 years ago, it would be worth $295.51 today based on a price of $155.97 for ORCL at the time of writing.
<h3>Oracle's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1748031345_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Trading Ideas

ORCL

Here's How Much $100 Invested In Oracle 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

Everybody "knows" that value investing doesn't work anymore. It's in all the headlines.
Investing today is about technology, everyone says. It's about artificial intelligence. It's about quantum computing, about the rebirth of nuclear energy.
Some of this is true, some isn't, but what's really not true is that value investing doesn't work. In fact, it still works better than just about any other investing approach.
The reason people say otherwise is because they've got value all wrong. "Value," they think, is just another word for "cheap." But most cheap stocks are cheap because they're bad investments.
Here's how to invest in value the right way using just two metrics – and beat the markets handily.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What People Get Wrong About Value</h2>
There are a couple of problems with the way people define value investing. First, we need to address the fact that the sound of it is boring.  Value investing sounds like a professor with tweed elbow patches smoking a pipe in an old dusty office in some brick and ivy university somewhere up in Vermont or Maine during a snowstorm. It just sounds boring.
Perhaps if we could call it vulture investing, market pillaging, or some other equally interesting name, it would attract more attention.
But then again, since we seem to have a corner on it, do we really want to attract all that much attention?
Second, let's talk about the way people track value. For instance, the Russell Value Index is supposed to represent value. When you compare it, growth has outperformed value for several hundred consecutive years, according to the literature.
That may be a slight exaggeration, but you get the point.
When you examine the Russell 1000 Value index, it's allegedly the bottom half of the Russell 2000 weighted by value components.
The top holdings include Berkshire Hathaway, Cisco Systems, McDonald&#8217;s, Walt Disney, Raytheon, and Caterpillar. These are all great companies.
What they are not is value companies.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Truth About Value</h2>
When we really look at the hard data, the truth is that absolute value never stopped working. When you look at companies that are trading at discounts to asset value, low multiples of the cash produced by the business, and low multiples of liquidation value, which is still one of my favorites, the truth is that they have continued to work and work very well.
The key thing that most people leave out is they will run a list of companies trading below book value and will say, &#8220;Look, these underperformed the market.&#8221; That is, in fact, true.
More than half of those companies are unprofitable and overleveraged, and their products are going completely out of style. You know, they are CD-ROM manufacturers or buggy whip makers in the business of making something we are never going to use again.
Many of the companies that trade below book value, in all honesty, do so for a reason. They are headed for the garbage pile.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Making Value Work: Financial Strength</h2>
How do we get rid of those? You have to adjust for a couple of factors:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>You want strength in the financial statements.</li>
<li>You want the ability to survive, and you prefer that they are profitable.</li>
</ul>
Two papers, with several follow-ups, have come out in the last twenty-five years that show us how to do this.
One of these is Joseph Piotrowski&#8217;s publication &#8220;Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers.&#8221; The F-score is based on that paper.
Value plus the F-score crush the market. When we add value plus the F-score plus credit scores, I prefer the Altman Z score—then you annihilate the market.
The key variable here is profitability and financial strength.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Missing Factor: Profitability</h2>
The other paper, which very few people seem to have read, is important.
In 2013, an economist, Robert Novy-Marks, published a paper that should have but didn&#8217;t redefine the entire playing field for investing. It is called &#8220;The Other Side of Value: The Gross Profitability Premium.&#8221;
Basically, they found that highly profitable companies outperform, no matter how cheap or expensive they may look. It is a single idea that gross profitability is the missing dimension, the missing factor.
It has found its way into some of the academic models. Novy-Marksed followed up on it with &#8220;Profitability Retrospective: What Have We Learned?&#8221;
This is key because many people today will tell you that quality matters. We have got to buy these quality companies. Everyone has a 16, 17, or 18-factor model that supposedly helps us identify truly high-quality companies.
Novy-Marks has found in both the original 2013 study and the retrospective today that you only need one factor to identify quality. That factor is profitability, which is defined in the original paper as gross profits as a percentage of assets.
The higher that is, the better the company is.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Quality Simplified</h2>
It explains all of the excess returns from so-called quality investing. When you ask what exactly we are looking for here, it turns out it all boils down to one simple measure.
You can use an 18-factor model, or you can use just gross profitability as a percent of assets. When you look at the largest cap companies that are in the upper end of the range: Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>), Amazon (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>), Alphabet (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOGL#NASDAQ">GOOGL</a>), Meta (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>), Walmart (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WMT#NYSE">WMT</a>), Visa (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/V#NYSE">V</a>), Eli Lilly (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LLY#NYSE">LLY</a>), MasterCard (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MA#NYSE">MA</a>), Oracle (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ORCL#NYSE">ORCL</a>), Johnson &amp; Johnson (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/JNJ#NYSE">JNJ</a>), Procter &amp; Gamble (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PG#NYSE">PG</a>), UnitedHealth (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/UNH#NYSE">UNH</a>), T-Mobile (NASDAQ: TMUS) &#8211; all of the same companies that would show up if we use that super sophisticated, 18-factor quality model for which you will pay a massive premium to have access to the data – it turns out you can get the same list using just gross profitability.
Gross profitability also explains all of the defensive strategies.
All of the defensive low beta stocks are just highly profitable companies that also are growing their asset base slowly. They are doing very conservative investing. They are not de-worsifying the business. They are not trying to grow at a high rate.
They are just ridiculously profitable companies that are willing to sit in place and do what they are good at and continually pile up profits and cash.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Unifying Factor</h2>
Profitability explains quality. It explains the low beta and low volatility phenomena.
Many investors have looked for new ways to define value. Cash flow to price, earnings forecast, intangible adjusted tangible book value, adjust for a lot of different factors in R&amp;D. These are going to "fix" value's alleged shortcomings in a day and age of high technology.
The truth is that all these newer value strategies sneak in profitability as a factor in addition to value. Profitability by itself delivers market-beating returns.
Profitability plus value, whether that is price to book or a different model that works, like enterprise value to earnings before interest and taxes, beats the market even more.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why Value Appears to Have Underperformed</h2>
When we look at the underperformance of "value" since 2007, the truth is that it's because we junked up the value universe. We put a lot of garbage in there. There are many stocks trading below book value that are biotech startup companies. They are below the cash balance on the balance sheet, but they are burning cash at a rapid rate and will soon be out of money. The book value will, in fact, disappear.
There are all these companies that look cheap but are wildly unprofitable. They are burning through money.
Then you have a lot of garbage that came in through the two SPAC movements in 2007 and then again in 2020 when companies that were still basically at the garage stage of existence suddenly went public.
We really junked up the value universe with a lot of garbage.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Foundation of Investment Success</h2>
Profitability is not just another factor but another tool.
It is a foundational tool that unifies multiple styles. It is part of quality, defensive value, and even some growth stocks.
Profitability explains a lot of the strategies that people use without relying on complicated, expensive 18-factor models.
If we take low-volatility companies and buy the most profitable, we are going to outperform the market.
If we just buy the most profitable companies, we are going to outperform the market.
If we buy the most profitable companies that are trading at low multiples of the cash produced by the business, we are going to absolutely crush the markets.
This is not a day trading system or a short-term trading system. It is the single best way to build long-term portfolios that beat the market and produce lasting wealth.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Unified Theory of Investing</h2>
Profitability explains almost everything that happens in the market. If you have a great business, it is wildly profitable.
If you are a quality company with high returns on equity, low leverage, and earning stability, you are a very profitable company.
If you are a defensive company with low volatility and lower beta, all of the outperformance of these strategies is because they are profitable companies that are not reinvesting in the business to rapidly grow the asset base.
You have low-investment, profitable companies. There is your entire defensive strategy.
The underperformance of value investing over the last fifteen years or so is entirely because of the addition of so many unprofitable companies. If we use F-scores and profitability to screen out just the profitable undervalued companies, performance goes through the roof.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Simple Path to Success</h2>
Most people won't do it because it doesn't make you rich by next Tuesday. It is not the absolute most exciting strategy on the planet. What it does is give you a very easy, quick way to uncover opportunities.
Two scores.
That is all you have to check. You can put together a universe of companies that can crush the market.
Basically, no folks, value investing is not dead.
If anything, if you understand that financial strength and profitability are the key to making value investing go from boring to the most exciting thing you can possibly do with your money, value investing is very much alive and still very successful.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Want to Trade the Next Reversal? Start Here</h2>
Matt Maley is watching one ultra-liquid ETF that surges when the market pulls back. He's used it time and time again—and this Wednesday at 6 PM ET, he'll be live to show you how to time it with precision. It's perfect for short-term traders looking to get ahead of the next move. Register <a href="https://events2.benzinga.com/matt-maley-webinar-wed-may28-2025-registration/?utm_campaign=webinar052825&amp;utm_adType=sponsorad&amp;utm_ad=RD052725">HERE</a> for this free masterclass now.
Editorial content from our expert contributors is intended to be information for the general public and not individualized investment advice. Editors/contributors are presenting their individual opinions and strategies, which are neither expressly nor impliedly approved or endorsed by Benzinga.
Photo: Shutterstock

Opinion

AAPL

AMZN

GOOGL

TMUS

Value Investing Is Not Dead - It Just Got Smarter

Pelican Acquisition Corporation (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PELIU#NASDAQ">PELIU</a>) (the "Company"), a Cayman Islands exempted company, announced that it priced its initial public offering of 7,500,000 units at $10.00 per unit on May 22, 2025. The units are listed on the Nasdaq Global Market ("NASDAQ") and trade under the ticker symbol "PELIU" beginning on May 23, 2025. Each unit consists of one ordinary share of the Company and one right, with each right entitling the holder thereof to receive one-tenth (1/10) of one ordinary share upon the consummation of an initial business combination.
Once the securities comprising the units begin separate trading, the ordinary shares and rights are expected to be listed on NASDAQ under the symbols "PELI" and "PELIR", respectively.

IPOs

PELI

PELIU

Pelican Acquisition Prices IPO Of 7.5M Units At $10.00/Unit, Begins Trading On NASDAQ Under "PELIU"

ZYBT

Zhengye Biotechnology Receives NASDAQ Letter Related To Late Filing Of Form 20-F

PRTA

Prothena Reveals Phase 3 AFFIRM-AL Clinical Trial for Birtamimab In Patients With AL Amyloidosis Did Not Meet Primary Endpoint

Marin Software Incorporated (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MRIN#NASDAQ">MRIN</a>) ("Marin," "we," "our," or the "Company"), a provider of digital marketing software for performance-driven advertisers and agencies, on May 21, 2025, received a notice (the "Notice") from the Listing Qualifications Department of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC ("Nasdaq") indicating that, as a result of the delinquency in the timely filing of the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2025 (the "Form 10-Q") and the Company's continuing delinquency in filing its annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (the "Form 10-K") as previously communicated by Nasdaq on April 16, 2025 (the "Initial Notice"), the Company is out of compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) (the "Listing Rule"), which requires listed companies to timely file all required periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC").

MRIN

Marin Software Receives Nasdaq Non-Compliance Notice Over Delayed SEC Filings

NOVA

Sunnova Energy Receives NYSE Letter Regarding Delayed Form 10-Q Filing

Offerings

IOBT

IO Biotech Files For For Resale Of Up To 5,623,664 Shares By Selling Stockholders

MOVE

Movano Receives Notice of Deficiency From Nasdaq Regarding Delayed Filing Of Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q

MRNA

Moderna Files Application To FDA For Review Of Its Spikevax 2025-2026 Formula Targeting The LP.8.1 Variant

Investors with a lot of money to spend have taken a bearish stance on Uber Technologies (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/UBER#NYSE">UBER</a>).
And retail traders should know.
We noticed this today when the trades showed up on publicly available options history that we track here at Benzinga.
Whether these are institutions or just wealthy individuals, we don't know. But when something this big happens with UBER, it often means somebody knows something is about to happen.
So how do we know what these investors just did? 
Today, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga</a>'s options scanner spotted 18 uncommon options trades for Uber Technologies.
This isn't normal.
The overall sentiment of these big-money traders is split between 33% bullish and 44%, bearish.
Out of all of the special options we uncovered, 5 are puts, for a total amount of $812,344, and 13 are calls, for a total amount of $1,048,676.
<h3>Projected Price Targets</h3>
After evaluating the trading volumes and Open Interest, it's evident that the major market movers are focusing on a price band between $35.0 and $100.0 for Uber Technologies, spanning the last three months.
<h3>Insights into Volume &amp; Open Interest</h3>
Looking at the volume and open interest is a powerful move while trading options. This data can help you track the liquidity and interest for Uber Technologies's options for a given strike price. Below, we can observe the evolution of the volume and open interest of calls and puts, respectively, for all of Uber Technologies's whale trades within a strike price range from $35.0 to $100.0 in the last 30 days. 
<h3>Uber Technologies Option Activity Analysis: Last 30 Days</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1748030890_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Biggest Options Spotted:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th>Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>UBER</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>09/19/25</td>
<td>$16.2</td>
<td>$16.15</td>
<td>$16.2</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
<td>$405.0K</td>
<td>10.3K</td>
<td>255</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>UBER</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/15/27</td>
<td>$16.8</td>
<td>$16.7</td>
<td>$16.8</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
<td>$398.1K</td>
<td>364</td>
<td>237</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>UBER</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$6.15</td>
<td>$6.05</td>
<td>$6.15</td>
<td>$77.50</td>
<td>$307.5K</td>
<td>2.8K</td>
<td>500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>UBER</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$2.47</td>
<td>$2.43</td>
<td>$2.46</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
<td>$123.0K</td>
<td>37.1K</td>
<td>955</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>UBER</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$1.12</td>
<td>$1.07</td>
<td>$1.12</td>
<td>$95.00</td>
<td>$84.0K</td>
<td>22.1K</td>
<td>1.2K</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About Uber Technologies</h3>
Uber Technologies is a technology provider that matches riders with drivers, hungry people with restaurants and food couriers, and shippers with carriers. The firm's on-demand technology platform is currently utilized by traditional cars as well as autonomous vehicles, but could eventually be used for additional products and services, such as delivery via drones or electronic vehicle take-off and landing (eVTOL) technology. Uber operates in over 70 countries, with over 170 million users who order rides or food at least once a month.
Following our analysis of the options activities associated with Uber Technologies, we pivot to a closer look at the company's own performance.
<h3>Current Position of Uber Technologies</h3>
<ul>
<li>With a volume of 14,443,579, the price of UBER is down -0.86% at $87.24. </li>
<li>RSI indicators hint that the underlying stock may be approaching overbought.</li>
<li>Next earnings are expected to be released in 74 days.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Expert Opinions on Uber Technologies</h3>
A total of 5 professional analysts have given their take on this stock in the last 30 days, setting an average price target of $97.0.
Turn $1000 into $1270 in just 20 days?
20-year pro options trader reveals his one-line chart technique that shows when to buy and sell. Copy his trades, which have had averaged a 27% profit every 20 days. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/options-moneyline-2/?t=Moop1arja3be22op14&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=options-activity&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>. 
&#x2A; An analyst from RBC Capital has decided to maintain their Outperform rating on Uber Technologies, which currently sits at a price target of $94. 
&#x2A; An analyst from Barclays persists with their Overweight rating on Uber Technologies, maintaining a target price of $97. 
&#x2A; In a cautious move, an analyst from Needham downgraded its rating to Buy, setting a price target of $90. 
&#x2A; An analyst from UBS has decided to maintain their Buy rating on Uber Technologies, which currently sits at a price target of $107. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from B of A Securities continues to hold a Buy rating for Uber Technologies, targeting a price of $97. 
Options trading presents higher risks and potential rewards. Astute traders manage these risks by continually educating themselves, adapting their strategies, monitoring multiple indicators, and keeping a close eye on market movements. Stay informed about the latest Uber Technologies options trades with real-time alerts from <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>.

Options

Markets

UBER

Looking At Uber Technologies's Recent Unusual Options Activity

High-rolling investors have positioned themselves bullish on Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FCX#NYSE">FCX</a>), and it's important for retail traders to take note. 
\This activity came to our attention today through Benzinga's tracking of publicly available options data. The identities of these investors are uncertain, but such a significant move in FCX often signals that someone has privileged information.
Today, Benzinga's options scanner spotted 19 options trades for Freeport-McMoRan. This is not a typical pattern.
The sentiment among these major traders is split, with 52% bullish and 42% bearish. Among all the options we identified, there was one put, amounting to $25,883, and 18 calls, totaling $1,221,036.
<h3>Projected Price Targets</h3>
Based on the trading activity, it appears that the significant investors are aiming for a price territory stretching from $30.0 to $44.0 for Freeport-McMoRan over the recent three months. 
<h3>Analyzing Volume &amp; Open Interest</h3>
Looking at the volume and open interest is an insightful way to conduct due diligence on a stock.
This data can help you track the liquidity and interest for Freeport-McMoRan's options for a given strike price.
Below, we can observe the evolution of the volume and open interest of calls and puts, respectively, for all of Freeport-McMoRan's whale activity within a strike price range from $30.0 to $44.0 in the last 30 days. 
<h3>Freeport-McMoRan Call and Put Volume: 30-Day Overview</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1748030886_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Significant Options Trades Detected:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th>Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>FCX</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>NEUTRAL</td>
<td>03/20/26</td>
<td>$4.4</td>
<td>$4.25</td>
<td>$4.32</td>
<td>$42.00</td>
<td>$147.7K</td>
<td>1.7K</td>
<td>342</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FCX</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>07/18/25</td>
<td>$3.6</td>
<td>$3.55</td>
<td>$3.55</td>
<td>$37.00</td>
<td>$142.0K</td>
<td>1.3K</td>
<td>971</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FCX</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>07/18/25</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>$0.52</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>$44.00</td>
<td>$137.1K</td>
<td>938</td>
<td>2.4K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FCX</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>07/18/25</td>
<td>$2.03</td>
<td>$1.84</td>
<td>$2.03</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
<td>$88.9K</td>
<td>9.3K</td>
<td>1.6K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FCX</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$1.08</td>
<td>$1.02</td>
<td>$1.08</td>
<td>$40.50</td>
<td>$88.0K</td>
<td>196</td>
<td>41</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About Freeport-McMoRan</h3>
Freeport-McMoRan owns stakes in 10 copper mines, led by its 49% ownership of the Grasberg copper and gold operations in Indonesia, 55% of the Cerro Verde mine in Peru, and 72% of Morenci in Arizona. It sold around 1.2 million metric tons of copper (its share) in 2024, making it the one of the world's largest copper miners by volume. It also sold about 900,000 ounces of gold, mostly from Grasberg, and 70 million pounds of molybdenum. It had about 25 years of copper reserves at the end of December 2024. We expect it to sell similar amounts of copper midcycle in 2029, though we expect gold volumes to decline to about 700,000 ounces then due to falling production at Grasberg.
<h3>Current Position of Freeport-McMoRan</h3>
<ul>
<li>Currently trading with a volume of 11,256,234, the FCX's price is up by 3.42%, now at $38.99. </li>
<li>RSI readings suggest the stock is currently may be approaching overbought.</li>
<li>Anticipated earnings release is in 60 days.</li>
</ul>
<h3>What Analysts Are Saying About Freeport-McMoRan</h3>
In the last month, 2 experts released ratings on this stock with an average target price of $46.5.
Turn $1000 into $1270 in just 20 days?
20-year pro options trader reveals his one-line chart technique that shows when to buy and sell. Copy his trades, which have had averaged a 27% profit every 20 days. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/options-moneyline-2/?t=Moop1arja3be22op14&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=options-activity&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from Jefferies continues to hold a Buy rating for Freeport-McMoRan, targeting a price of $50. 
&#x2A; An analyst from Scotiabank persists with their Sector Perform rating on Freeport-McMoRan, maintaining a target price of $43. 
Options are a riskier asset compared to just trading the stock, but they have higher profit potential. Serious options traders manage this risk by educating themselves daily, scaling in and out of trades, following more than one indicator, and following the markets closely.
If you want to stay updated on the latest options trades for Freeport-McMoRan, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a> gives you real-time options trades alerts.

Decoding Freeport-McMoRan's Options Activity: What's the Big Picture?

Whales with a lot of money to spend have taken a noticeably bearish stance on Intuit.
Looking at options history for Intuit (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/INTU#NASDAQ">INTU</a>) we detected 63 trades.
If we consider the specifics of each trade, it is accurate to state that 36% of the investors opened trades with bullish expectations and 38% with bearish.
From the overall spotted trades, 7 are puts, for a total amount of $739,544 and 56, calls, for a total amount of $3,461,382.
<h3>Projected Price Targets</h3>
Based on the trading activity, it appears that the significant investors are aiming for a price territory stretching from $440.0 to $880.0 for Intuit over the recent three months. 
<h3>Volume &amp; Open Interest Development</h3>
Looking at the volume and open interest is an insightful way to conduct due diligence on a stock.
This data can help you track the liquidity and interest for Intuit's options for a given strike price.
Below, we can observe the evolution of the volume and open interest of calls and puts, respectively, for all of Intuit's whale activity within a strike price range from $440.0 to $880.0 in the last 30 days. 
<h3>Intuit Option Volume And Open Interest Over Last 30 Days</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1748030881_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Noteworthy Options Activity:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th align="right">Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>INTU</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>07/18/25</td>
<td>$29.0</td>
<td>$28.5</td>
<td>$28.5</td>
<td>$720.00</td>
<td>$446.0K</td>
<td>1</td>
<td align="right">428</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>INTU</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$53.0</td>
<td>$47.1</td>
<td>$48.87</td>
<td>$690.00</td>
<td>$245.9K</td>
<td>530</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>INTU</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$60.3</td>
<td>$59.1</td>
<td>$59.1</td>
<td>$670.00</td>
<td>$236.4K</td>
<td>319</td>
<td align="right">16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>INTU</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$46.8</td>
<td>$43.6</td>
<td>$46.0</td>
<td>$690.00</td>
<td>$184.0K</td>
<td>530</td>
<td align="right">347</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>INTU</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$77.1</td>
<td>$73.5</td>
<td>$73.5</td>
<td>$660.00</td>
<td>$110.2K</td>
<td>1.3K</td>
<td align="right">57</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About Intuit</h3>
Intuit serves small and midsize businesses with accounting software QuickBooks and online marketing platform Mailchimp. The company also operates retail tax filing tool TurboTax, personal finance platform Credit Karma, and a suite of professional tax offerings for accountants. Founded in the mid-1980s, Intuit enjoys a dominant market share for small business accounting and do-it-yourself tax filing in the US.
In light of the recent options history for Intuit, it's now appropriate to focus on the company itself. We aim to explore its current performance.
<h3>Present Market Standing of Intuit</h3>
<ul>
<li>Currently trading with a volume of 4,646,028, the INTU's price is up by 8.37%, now at $721.82. </li>
<li>RSI readings suggest the stock is currently may be overbought.</li>
<li>Anticipated earnings release is in 90 days.</li>
</ul>
<h3>What Analysts Are Saying About Intuit</h3>
5 market experts have recently issued ratings for this stock, with a consensus target price of $816.8.
Unusual Options Activity Detected: Smart Money on the Move
Benzinga Edge's Unusual Options board spots potential market movers before they happen. See what positions big money is taking on your favorite stocks. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22bz20&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=options-activity&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>. 
&#x2A; Consistent in their evaluation, an analyst from Morgan Stanley keeps a Overweight rating on Intuit with a target price of $785. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from Citigroup continues to hold a Buy rating for Intuit, targeting a price of $789. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from B of A Securities continues to hold a Buy rating for Intuit, targeting a price of $875. 
&#x2A; Consistent in their evaluation, an analyst from Evercore ISI Group keeps a Outperform rating on Intuit with a target price of $785. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from RBC Capital continues to hold a Outperform rating for Intuit, targeting a price of $850. 
Options trading presents higher risks and potential rewards. Astute traders manage these risks by continually educating themselves, adapting their strategies, monitoring multiple indicators, and keeping a close eye on market movements. Stay informed about the latest Intuit options trades with real-time alerts from <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>.

INTU

Intuit Options Trading: A Deep Dive into Market Sentiment

PCB Bancorp Receives Nasdaq Letter Regarding Late Form 10-Q Filing

BOLD

Boundless Bio Announces Portfolio Prioritization And Runway Extension; Prioritizes BBI-355/BBI-825 Combination And BBI-940; Discontinues Current Arms Of BBI-355 In Potentiate Trial; To Evaluate BBI-355/BBI-825 Combination In 2025; Reduces Workforce By One-Third

Comments

SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF

Vendite allo scoperto

SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (NASDAQ:FCTE), Report sulle vendite allo scoperto

Notizie

PARTNER/COLLABORATORE

BENZINGA NEL MONDO