La vendita allo scoperto per Metaplanet dà agli investitori un'idea del grado in cui gli investitori stanno scommettendo sul declino delle azioni di Metaplanet. I dati relativi alle vendite allo scoperto vengono aggiornati ogni due settimane.

Metaplanet (OTC:MTPLF) Azioni, Report sulle vendite allo scoperto

Metaplanet Inc is engaged in the Hotel business and also builds and invests in decentralized, trustless, and secure Web3 platforms, companies, and communities that leverage the power of blockchain technology. The company strives to create a more equitable and decentralized digital economy, where users have full control over their data and assets and to enable practical Web3 adoption for all. Its reportable segments are Hotel Business and Others. The majority of its revenue is generated from the Hotel Business segment which includes operating and managing the Royal Oak hotel in Japan.

Metaplanet Inc

TJX Companies (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TJX#NYSE">TJX</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 15 years by 6.02% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 18.1%. Currently, TJX Companies has a market capitalization of $151.36 billion. 
Buying $100 In TJX: If an investor had bought $100 of TJX stock 15 years ago, it would be worth $1,190.12 today based on a price of $134.64 for TJX at the time of writing.
<h3>TJX Companies's Performance Over Last 15 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747773927_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

News

Trading Ideas

$100 Invested In TJX Companies 15 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

DaVita Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DVA#NYSE">DVA</a>) ("DaVita") announced today the upsize and pricing of its previously announced private offering (the "offering") of its 6.750% senior notes due 2033 (the "2033 notes"). The aggregate principal amount of the 2033 notes offered in the offering was increased from $750 million to $1 billion, and the 2033 notes were priced at 100.000% of their face amount to yield a 6.750% coupon. The offering is expected to close on May 23, 2025, subject to satisfaction of customary closing conditions.

Offerings

DaVita Announces Upsize And Pricing Of Its Previously Announced Private Offering Of Its 6.750% Senior Notes Due 2033 From $750M To $1B

Earnings

Earnings Misses

EARN

Ellington Credit Q1 Adj. EPS $0.26 Misses $0.27 Estimate, Sales $9.25M Miss $9.35M Estimate

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The request to get serious</h2>
Let's talk about exclusivity in M&amp;A transactions. The request for exclusivity often occurs at that moment in a deal where a buyer approaches a seller with the intention of making a commitment. "Hey, we want to buy you, but before we go too far down this road, we need to make sure you're not talking to anyone else." It's the financial equivalent of locking down a relationship: no swiping left or right while we're trying to make this work, okay?
Of course, in finance, nothing is ever that simple.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The exclusivity agreement</h2>
Let's say you're a company looking to get acquired, and you've been approached by a suitor. Maybe several, if you're lucky. Before the mayhem of the bidding war ensues, the buyer you like says, "We want a deal, but we need exclusivity for 45 days." Shorthand for, "We don't want you talking to anyone else while we're hammering out the details." Fair enough, right?
Here's the buyer's logic: Deals require lots of upfront investment in time and resources for due diligence, analysis on deal structuring etc. Buyers don't want to spend millions just to find out halfway through that you've been secretly talking to someone else and now you're going to pursue Option B instead.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Exclusivity's little twist: Is it really exclusive?</h2>
An exclusivity agreement sounds like it would be ironclad &#8211; no talking to other buyers, no shopping yourself around, nothing. You're locked in, right? Not quite. It's more like a promise that you won't actively seek out other deals. The door isn't totally locked – it's just slightly ajar. &nbsp;The company selling itself might still get unsolicited offers. If someone wants to slide a very tempting note under the door, technically no one is stopping them.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">So, what happens when someone else knocks on your door?</h2>
What if, during your 45-day exclusivity window, another buyer shows up and waves a better deal in front of you? Now you're in a tough spot. Do you go back to your exclusive partner and say, "We've been offered something better. What can you do?"
You may be subject to a "no-shop" clause (i.e, you can't actively seek other offers), but you still need to protect yourself if an unsolicited offer presents a better opportunity. Ultimately, a seller's Board has a fiduciary duty to maximize value for its shareholders and must be cautious not to waive this obligation due to an exclusivity arrangement.
In other words, you can't shop yourself around, but if another buyer approaches you, well… your phone isn't exactly on airplane mode.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What if it all falls apart?</h2>
Let's say you've been in an exclusive process, hammering out details, and then the exclusivity period ends without a deal.&nbsp; This happened during Paramount's initial discussions with Skydance in mid-2024. Now, you're free to talk to other suitors like Paramount did with Apollo and Sony, yet there's no guarantee you'll get a better offer. Meanwhile, Skydance is still technically around (and may ultimately get to a signed deal), but the door is open for interlopers to engage in discussions.
The end of the exclusivity period gives you options, yet it also creates uncertainty. On the one hand, you can explore other opportunities, but on the other, new buyers may wonder why the last party didn't commit.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">So, is exclusivity worth it?</h2>
It depends.
Here's where it gets tricky: exclusivity periods have been getting longer in recent years. In 2021, only 6% of deals had exclusivity periods longer than 60 days, but by 2022, that number increased to nearly 40%, a trend that is expected to continue (<a href="https://www.goodwinlaw.com/en/insights/publications/2023/05/insights-privateequity-ma-durations-exclusivity-periods?utm_source=chatgpt.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Goodwin, 2023</a>).
So, while buyers prefer long exclusivity periods to facilitate comprehensive due diligence, sellers might be locking themselves into a deal that could ultimately fall apart. If exclusivity doesn&#8217;t result in a deal, a seller could spend months watching potential bidders fade away.
Exclusivity is often worth considering if:
<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li>The seller has a strong pre-existing relationship with a buyer</li>
<li>A buyer presents an exceptionally attractive offer (assuming they're serious)</li>
<li>The seller is in financial distress and exclusivity will facilitate a more rapid diligence timeline</li>
</ol>
Ultimately, agreeing to exclusivity with a buyer can be a double-edged sword. These decisions should always be made case-by-case, in consultation with financial advisors who can help evaluate the unique dynamics of each transaction.

Equities

Opinion

Markets

Locked In: How Exclusivity Shapes the M&A Landscape

Keysight Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KEYS#NYSE">KEYS</a>) released its second-quarter results after Tuesday's closing bell. Here's a look at the<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/25/05/b45529263/keysight-technologies-reports-second-quarter-2025-results"> details from the report. </a>
The Details: Keysight Technologies reported quarterly earnings of $1.70 per share, which beat the consensus estimate of $1.65. Quarterly revenue came in at $1.31 billion, which beat the Street estimate of $1.28 billion and is up from revenue of $1.22 billion from the same period last year.
Read Next: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/large-cap/25/05/45524565/nvidias-1-trillion-comeback-shows-deepseek-no-longer-spooks-wall-street?utm_source=articleShare">Nvidia&#8217;s $1 Trillion Comeback Shows DeepSeek No Longer Spooks Wall Street&nbsp;</a>
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Communications Solutions Group reported revenue of $913 million in the second quarter, up 9% from the prior year, reflecting 9% growth in commercial communications and 9% growth in aerospace, defense and government.</li>
<li>Electronic Industrial Solutions Group reported revenue of $393 million in the second quarter, up 5% from the prior year, reflecting growth in semiconductor and general electronics, partially offset by a decline in automotive and energy.</li>
</ul>
&#8220;Keysight delivered strong second quarter results with revenue and earnings per share above the high end of guidance. This quarter&#8217;s performance underscores the strength of our long-term strategy, deep customer engagement and disciplined execution,&#8221; said Satish Dhanasekaran, Keysight CEO.
&#8220;Even as we are monitoring the overall macroeconomic environment, we continue to see a healthy funnel of opportunities and are raising full-year growth expectations to the midpoint of our long-term 5%-7% target,&#8221; Dhanasekaran added.
Outlook:&nbsp;Keysight sees third-quarter EPS is a range of $1.63 to $1.69, versus the $1.69&nbsp;analyst estimate, and revenue of between $1.305 billion and $1.325 billion, versus the&nbsp;$1.3 billion&nbsp;estimate.
KEYS Price Action: According to data from <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/?gspk=YWRhbWVja2VydDUzMzY&amp;gsxid=zBMR4PKmcgBw">Benzinga Pro</a>, Keysight stock was up 4.60% at $170.28 after-hours Tuesday.  
Read Next:&nbsp;
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/government/regulations/25/05/45506863/trumps-big-beautiful-bill-advances-heres-who-wins-and-loses?utm_source=articleShare">Trump&#8217;s &#8216;Big Beautiful Bill&#8217; Advances: Here&#8217;s Who Wins And Loses&nbsp;</a></li>
</ul>
Image: Shutterstock

After-Hours Center

Movers

Tech

KEYS

Keysight Technologies Stock Climbs After Q2 Results: Here's Why

XWELL (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/XWEL#NASDAQ">XWEL</a>) reported quarterly losses of $(1.00) per share. This is a 66.67 percent decrease over losses of $(0.60) per share from the same period last year. The company reported $7.02 million in sales this quarter. This is a 19.52 percent decrease over sales of $8.73 million the same period last year.

XWEL

XWELL Q1 EPS $(1.00) Down From $(0.60) YoY, Sales $7.02M Down From $8.73M YoY

President Donald Trump has touted multi-trillion-dollar investment commitments as proof that his economic strategy is delivering a historic revival of <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/donald-trump">American manufacturing and infrastructure. </a>
Yet, behind the massive figures, new analysis from Goldman Sachs suggests the actual economic impact could be far more modest.
Foreign governments and corporations have pledged over $6 trillion in U.S. investments, including $2 trillion from companies and $4.2 trillion from foreign governments, according to Goldman Sachs economist Joseph Briggs.
Just a week ago, President Trump secured $2 trillion in investment commitments from Gulf nations, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. Meanwhile, Japan pledged $1 trillion.
Among the companies making the largest pledges, Nvidia Corp. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) announced $787 billion, followed by International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IBM#NYSE">IBM</a>) with $409 billion, Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) with $302 billion, and Eli Lilly &amp; Co. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LLY#NYSE">LLY</a>) with $35 billion.
"We expect the impact on U.S. investment to be smaller than suggested by these promises for three reasons," Briggs said in a report, highlighting project uncertainty, limited alignment with national accounts definitions, and overlap with prior plans.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The Real Investment Boost May Be Just $30B–$135B</h3>
After analyzing the announcements and stripping out less tangible commitments—like purchases of goods, partnerships, and reannounced projects—Goldman estimates that only $135 billion in new annual investment is directly tied to GDP-relevant projects like physical capital expenditures and R&amp;D. 
Applying historical realization rates and analyst feedback, the bank sees the likely net impact closer to $30 billion per year, or just 0.1% of U.S. GDP.
That figure starkly contrasts with headline projections that initially suggested a 4% GDP boost over time.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Why The Gap?</h3>
Many large-cap companies, including Apple Inc. and Nvidia Corp., have promised massive investments—$500 billion each over multiple years—but their past spending doesn't align. 
Apple spent just $10 billion on U.S. capex and $31.4 billion on global R&amp;D in 2024. Nvidia's corresponding figures were even lower, suggesting that headline figures may include spending on acquisitions, partnerships or input costs that don't translate into actual U.S. capital formation.
Further, Goldman's equity analysts found that 69% of the corporate investments likely overlap with previously planned spending, with just 6% seen as mostly new.
Goldman Sachs noted that &#8220;these announcements have not driven major upgrades to equity analyst capex forecasts.&#8221;
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Foreign Deals May Help, If They Materialize</h3>
&#8220;In contrast to company-level announcements, investment promises from the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Japan could provide a material incremental increase if they materialize,&#8221; Briggs said.
Countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Japan and the UAE have announced ambitious commitments—from AI data centers to energy infrastructure and defense purchases.
Both Saudi Arabia and Qatar emphasized large-scale purchases of U.S. goods—$142 billion in defense contracts from Saudi Arabia and $96 billion in aircraft orders from Qatar—which would support U.S. GDP through exports, but not count as domestic investment. 
Yet, the lack of specificity on most other announced projects suggests that much of the foreign capital may contribute indirectly by lowering financing costs rather than driving immediate, measurable increases in U.S. capital formation.
Read Next:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/economics/macro-economic-events/25/05/45528339/us-assets-still-vital-in-global-portfolios-despite-debt-downgrade-blackrock">US Assets Still Vital In Global Portfolios Despite Debt Downgrade: BlackRock </a></li>
</ul>
Photo: Shutterstock

Analyst Color

Large Cap

Politics

Econ #s

Analyst Ratings

AAPL

NVDA

Trump's $6 Trillion Investment Deals Face Reality Check: Only A Fraction May Reach The Real Economy

Daily Journal (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DJCO#NASDAQ">DJCO</a>) reported quarterly earnings of $32.43 per share. This is a 189.81 percent increase over earnings of $11.19 per share from the same period last year. The company reported $18.18 million in sales this quarter. This is a 9.69 percent increase over sales of $16.57 million the same period last year.

DJCO

Daily Journal Q2 EPS $32.43 Up From $11.19 YoY, Sales $18.18M Up From $16.57M YoY

Beeline Holdings (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BLNE#NASDAQ">BLNE</a>) reported quarterly losses of $(3.71) per share. This is a 9.95 percent increase over losses of $(4.12) per share from the same period last year. The company reported $1.83 million in sales this quarter. This is a 206.87 percent increase over sales of $597.00 thousand the same period last year.

BLNE

Beeline Holdings Q1 EPS $(3.71) Up From $(4.12) YoY, Sales $1.83M Up From $597.00K YoY

Palo Alto Networks Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PANW#NASDAQ">PANW</a>) reported third-quarter financial results for fiscal 2025 after the market close on Tuesday. Here&#8217;s a rundown of the <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/25/05/n45529278/palo-alto-networks-reports-fiscal-third-quarter-2025-financial-results">cybersecurity company&#8217;s report</a>.
Q3 Earnings: Palo Alto reported third-quarter revenue of $2.29 billion, beating the&nbsp;<a href="http://benzinga.com/quote/PANW/earnings" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">consensus estimate</a>&nbsp;of $2.28 billion. The company reported third-quarter adjusted earnings of 80 cents per share, beating analyst estimates of 77 cents per share, according to <a href="http://pro.benzinga.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Benzinga Pro</a>.
Total revenue was up 15% year-over-year and remaining performance obligations grew 19% year-over-year to $13.5 billion. The cybersecurity company said next-generation security annual recurring revenue increased 34% year-over-year to $5.1 billion.
Palo Alto ended the quarter with approximately $2.38 billion in cash and cash equivalents.
&#8220;In&nbsp;Q3, we continued to make progress on our platformization strategy and achieved an important milestone in crossing&nbsp;$5 billion&nbsp;in Next-Gen Security ARR,&#8221; said&nbsp;Nikesh Arora, chairman and CEO of Palo Alto Networks. &#8220;Our scale and platform breadth makes us a leading consolidator of choice in cybersecurity.&#8221;
Guidance:&nbsp;Palo Alto expects fiscal fourth-quarter revenue to be in the range of $2.49 billion to $2.51 billion versus estimates of $2.5 billion. The company expects fourth-quarter adjusted earnings to be between 87 cents and 89 cents per share versus estimates of 86 cents per share.
Palo Alto also raised its full-year 2025 guidance. The company now expects full-year revenue of $9.17 billion to $9.19 billion, up from prior guidance of $9.14 billion to $9.19 billion. The company now anticipates full-year adjusted earnings of $3.26 to $3.28 per share, up from prior guidance of $3.18 to $3.24 per share, per&nbsp;<a href="http://pro.benzinga.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Benzinga Pro</a>. Analysts are forecasting full-year revenue of $9.17 billion and full-year adjusted earnings of $3.22 per share.
Palo Alto executives will further discuss the company&#8217;s quarterly performance on a conference call with investors and analysts at 4:30 p.m. ET.
PANW Price Action: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/PANW" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Palo Alto shares</a> were up approximately 6.5% year-to-date heading into the report. The stock was down 3.81% after hours, trading at $187.09 at the time of publication Tuesday, according to <a href="http://pro.benzinga.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Benzinga Pro</a>.
Read Next:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/25/05/45526658/palo-alto-networks-is-a-top-ai-driven-cybersecurity-play-analyst">Palo Alto Networks Is A Top AI-Driven Cybersecurity Play: Analyst</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/movers/25/05/45501031/crowdstrike-announces-integration-in-nvidia-enterprise-ai-factory">CrowdStrike Announces Integration In Nvidia Enterprise AI Factory</a></li>
</ul>
Photo: Shutterstock.

Guidance

PANW

Palo Alto Reports Q3 Earnings, Raises FY25 Guidance, Shares Slide

Dividends

Carter's Cuts Quarterly Dividend From $0.80 To $0.25 Per Share

Commodities

API Weekly Crude Stock: 2.499M Barrel Build vs 1.850M Barrel Draw Est.

The trading activity of members of Congress has<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/01/42860759/10-best-stock-traders-in-congress-in-2024-where-do-nancy-pelosi-pete-sessions-susan-collins-marjorie-taylor-greene-rank"> drawn increased attention</a> from retail traders. Some disclosed trades resulted in huge profits, potential conflicts of interest, and red flags.
One new member of Congress found out that trading stocks while in office might not be as easy as everyone thinks.
What Happened: Members of Congress are currently able to buy and sell stocks and options as long as they disclose within 45 days, a practice that<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/politics/25/04/45077654/bill-named-after-nancy-pelosi-could-ban-congress-members-from-trading-stocks-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-pelosi-act"> the P.E.L.O.S.I. Act</a> looks to end if passed by Congress.
While some members of Congress like Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) have<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/05/45527616/marjorie-taylor-greene-goes-shopping-for-tesla-netflix-unitedhealth-stock-here-are-the-latest-19-stocks-bought"> disclosed hundreds of trades</a> in 2025, Rep. John McGuire (R-Va.) is new to the game.
The Congressman who was sworn into office in January 2025 has made only one stock transaction according to the <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/gov-trades/members/john-mcguire">Benzinga Government Trades</a> page.
On April 10, McGuire purchased between $1,000 and $15,000 in UnitedHealth Group stock, one of the largest health insurance companies in the United States.
The purchase drew attention because McGuire serves on the Subcommittee on Health Care and Financial Services, a unit of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
However, the timing of the trade likely couldn't have gotten much worse for McGuire, who bought the stock before <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/05/45494155/unitedhealth-stock-is-rising-monday-whats-going-on">quarterly financial results</a> that saw the company pull guidance and announce its CEO Andrew Witty was stepping down.
The Wall Street Journal also reported that the Justice Department was<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/general/health-care/25/05/45426769/unitedhealth-stock-plunges-over-8-in-after-hours-trading-as-doj-criminal-probe-adds-to-turmoil-after-ceo-shake-up"> investigating the company</a> for potential Medicare fraud. The health insurance company said it hasn't been notified of any investigation.
UnitedHealth Group shares traded between $580.00 and $601.88 on April 10 when McGuire made his purchase. Today, the stock trades at $321.50 and has fallen between 46.6% and 44.6% since April 10.
Assuming McGuire bought the full $15,000 value of UnitedHealth Group in his disclosure, the position would be worth $8,010 to $8,310 today.
Read Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/politics/25/05/45449720/speaker-johnson-backs-congressional-stock-trading-ban-ruined-by-a-few-bad-actors">Speaker Johnson Backs Congressional Stock Trading Ban: Ruined By &#8216;A Few Bad Actors&#8217;</a>
Why It's Important: McGuire's trade could mark a new era in which members of Congress lose money instead of making large profits on their stock and options activities.
In 2024, many members of Congress outperformed the S&amp;P 500. Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has often been the top-followed member of Congress for trading activity, with her husband Paul Pelosi often buying in-the-money options on large technology stocks.
Sen.&nbsp;Josh Hawley&nbsp;(R-Mo.) has reintroduced legislation that would ban members of Congress from trading or holding individual stocks.
The bill is known as the Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments Act, or PELOSI Act, based on the first letter of each of the main words. The name targets Pelosi.
Hawley's bill is being reintroduced as President&nbsp;Donald Trump&nbsp;<a href="https://time.com/7280114/donald-trump-2025-interview-transcript/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">said&nbsp;</a>he would support such a ban.
"Well, I watched Nancy Pelosi get rich through insider information, and I would be okay with it. If they send it to me, I would do it," Trump told TIME.
Trump said he would sign the ban if the bill passes Congress.
While Pelosi makes headlines for her trades, it's important to remember that<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/politics/25/04/44852406/marjorie-taylor-greene-brushes-off-stock-buying-criticism-says-portfolio-manager-bought-the-dip" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> </a><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/politics/25/04/44852406/marjorie-taylor-greene-brushes-off-stock-buying-criticism-says-portfolio-manager-bought-the-dip" target="_blank" rel="noopener">both Republican</a> and Democratic members of Congress are profiting from buying and selling stocks and options while in office. Some trades have questionable timing or are connected to committees they serve on.
In 2024, a list of the top-performing traders in Congress included six Republicans and four Democrats.
For McGuire to make the 2025 list of best-performing members of Congress, he will have to buy more stocks or hope for a huge recovery in the price of UnitedHealth Group stock.
Did You Know?
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Congress Is Making Huge Investments.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/gov-trades/?utm_source=BZprocontent052025" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Get Tips On What They Bought And Sold With Our Easy-to-Use Tool</a></li>
</ul>
Photo: Shutterstock

New Congressman's First Stock Trade Tanks 45% After Betting On UnitedHealth Before Fallout

Northrop Grumman Increases Quarterly Dividend From $2.06 To $2.31/Share

XP (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/XP#NASDAQ">XP</a>) reported quarterly earnings of $0.39 per share which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $0.38 by 2.63 percent. This is a 5.41 percent increase over earnings of $0.37 per share from the same period last year. The company reported quarterly sales of $741.93 million which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $755.03 million by 1.73 percent. This is a 9.39 percent decrease over sales of $818.79 million the same period last year.

Earnings Beats

XP Q1 EPS $0.39 Beats $0.38 Estimate, Sales $741.93M Miss $755.03M Estimate

WIIM

Toll Brothers shares are trading higher after the company reported better-than-expected Q2 financial results.

<a href="https://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.graniteconstruction.com%2F&amp;esheet=54257818&amp;newsitemid=20250520116756&amp;lan=en-US&amp;anchor=Granite&amp;index=1&amp;md5=9b18326c86212d392386677f69983ab0">Granite </a>(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GVA#NYSE">GVA</a>) has been awarded a Federally funded $54 million contract to build the first of two construction phases under a Construction Manager/General Contractor (CMGC) contract with the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT &amp; PF).
This phase of the project involves the realignment of the Parks Highway from milepost 319 to 322, aimed to reduce sharp corners and improve traffic safety. Major work activities include 2.5 million cubic yards of onsite earthwork, 25,000 tons of asphalt paving, and implementation of a full traffic diversion. The project leverages all facets of Granite's equipment fleet, including a portable crusher and hot plant. The estimated construction contract value for the remaining segment is approximately $35 million.
Construction began May 1, 2025, and is estimated to be completed by September 2027.

Contracts

Granite Secures Federally Funded $54M Contract To Build First Of Two Construction Phases Under CMGC Contract With Alaska DOT & PF

Toll Brothers (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TOL#NYSE">TOL</a>) reported quarterly earnings of $3.50 per share which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $2.92 by 19.86 percent. This is a 3.55 percent increase over earnings of $3.38 per share from the same period last year. The company reported quarterly sales of $2.71 billion which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $2.48 billion by 9.11 percent. This is a 4.51 percent decrease over sales of $2.84 billion the same period last year.

Toll Brothers Q2 EPS $3.50 Beats $2.92 Estimate, Sales $2.71B Beat $2.48B Estimate

Kraft Heinz Evaluates Strategic Transactions To Unlock Shareholder Value

<h3>GAINERS:</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/TGIFF">1933 Industries</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TGIFF#OTC">TGIFF</a>) shares closed up 19.61% at $0.01</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CLSH">CLS Holdings USA</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CLSH#OTC">CLSH</a>) shares closed up 14.16% at $0.03</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CNBX">CNBX Pharmaceuticals</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CNBX#OTC">CNBX</a>) shares closed up 12.50% at $0.00</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/LMLLF">Pharmadrug</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LMLLF#OTC">LMLLF</a>) shares closed up 12.09% at $0.01</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CVSI">CV Sciences</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CVSI#OTC">CVSI</a>) shares closed up 11.20% at $0.03</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/VFF">Village Farms Intl</a> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VFF#NASDAQ">VFF</a>) shares closed up 10.68% at $1.09</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CXXIF">C21 Investments</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CXXIF#OTC">CXXIF</a>) shares closed up 8.80% at $0.16</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/KAYS">Kaya Holdings</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KAYS#OTC">KAYS</a>) shares closed up 8.57% at $0.04</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CGC">Canopy Gwth</a> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CGC#NASDAQ">CGC</a>) shares closed up 7.31% at $1.77</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/ACB">Aurora Cannabis</a> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ACB#NASDAQ">ACB</a>) shares closed up 6.37% at $5.34</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CRBP">Corbus Pharmaceuticals</a> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CRBP#NASDAQ">CRBP</a>) shares closed up 6.05% at $7.57</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/RMHB">Rocky Mountain High</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RMHB#OTC">RMHB</a>) shares closed up 5.56% at $0.00</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/UGRO">Urban-gro</a> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/UGRO#NASDAQ">UGRO</a>) shares closed up 5.02% at $0.40</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CBWTF">Auxly Cannabis Group</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CBWTF#OTC">CBWTF</a>) shares closed up 3.25% at $0.06</li>
</ul>
<h3>LOSERS:</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/FFNTF">4Front Ventures</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FFNTF#OTC">FFNTF</a>) shares closed down 47.37% at $0.00</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/FUAPF">Global Compliance</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FUAPF#OTC">FUAPF</a>) shares closed down 31.03% at $0.00</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/BBRRF">Blueberries Medical</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BBRRF#OTC">BBRRF</a>) shares closed down 26.72% at $0.01</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CURR">Currenc Group</a> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CURR#NASDAQ">CURR</a>) shares closed down 20.16% at $0.64</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/LVRLF">CordovaCann</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LVRLF#OTC">LVRLF</a>) shares closed down 19.01% at $0.05</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/ITHUF">iAnthus Capital Hldgs</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ITHUF#OTC">ITHUF</a>) shares closed down 16.17% at $0.00</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/OILFF">Nextleaf Solutions</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/OILFF#OTC">OILFF</a>) shares closed down 12.94% at $0.04</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/LBUY">Leafbuyer Techs</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LBUY#OTC">LBUY</a>) shares closed down 12.69% at $0.02</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CNTMF">FLUENT</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CNTMF#OTC">CNTMF</a>) shares closed down 11.54% at $0.05</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/SOLCF">SOL Global Investments</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SOLCF#OTC">SOLCF</a>) shares closed down 8.20% at $0.06</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/GNLN">Greenlane Hldgs</a> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GNLN#NASDAQ">GNLN</a>) shares closed down 8.06% at $0.01</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/XXII">22nd Century Group</a> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/XXII#NASDAQ">XXII</a>) shares closed down 5.32% at $1.04</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/NWVCF">EnWave</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NWVCF#OTC">NWVCF</a>) shares closed down 4.36% at $0.23</li>
</ul>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Comments

Metaplanet

Vendite allo scoperto

Metaplanet (OTC:MTPLF) Azioni, Report sulle vendite allo scoperto

Notizie

PARTNER/COLLABORATORE

BENZINGA NEL MONDO