La catena delle opzioni mostra i dati chiave delle opzioni azionarie di NetPay Intl a vari prezzi di esercizio e date di scadenza. I trader utilizzano queste informazioni per analizzare potenziali operazioni e valutare il sentiment del mercato per NetPay Intl..

NetPay Intl (OTC:NTPY) Azioni, Catena delle Opzioni

NetPay International Inc is a United States based development stage company. It offers online payment gateway solutions. The company has developed powerful monitoring systems to ensure clients safety and prevent fraud risks.

NETPAY INTERNATIONAL INC by NetPay International Inc.

NetPay International Inc

In the latest quarter, 15 analysts provided ratings for Texas Instruments (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TXN#NASDAQ">TXN</a>), showcasing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.
The following table provides a quick overview of their recent ratings, highlighting the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have set 12-month price targets for Texas Instruments, revealing an average target of $181.0, a high estimate of $225.00, and a low estimate of $125.00. Observing a downward trend, the current average is 13.13% lower than the prior average price target of $208.36. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1746050473_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Understanding Analyst Ratings: A Comprehensive Breakdown</h2>
The perception of Texas Instruments by financial experts is analyzed through recent analyst actions. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Jay Goldberg</td>
<td>Seaport Global</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Sell</td>
<td>$130.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cody Acree</td>
<td>Benchmark</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
<td>$230.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Timothy Arcuri</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$215.00</td>
<td>$225.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joseph Moore</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$148.00</td>
<td>$146.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Prisco</td>
<td>Cantor Fitzgerald</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$170.00</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Harlan Sur</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$195.00</td>
<td>$230.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>William Stein</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$171.00</td>
<td>$195.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joshua Buchalter</td>
<td>TD Securities</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$160.00</td>
<td>$160.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brett Fishbin</td>
<td>Keybanc</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$215.00</td>
<td>$250.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joe Quatrochi</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$175.00</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kevin Garrigan</td>
<td>Rosenblatt</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$216.00</td>
<td>$216.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tom O'Malley</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$125.00</td>
<td>$180.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tore Svanberg</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$160.00</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Timothy Arcuri</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$225.00</td>
<td>$250.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Christopher Danely</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$210.00</td>
<td>$235.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Responding to changing market dynamics and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their response to recent developments related to Texas Instruments. This offers insight into analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts unravel qualitative evaluations for stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings offer insights into expectations for the relative performance of Texas Instruments compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts predict movements in price targets, offering estimates for Texas Instruments's future value. Examining the current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
Navigating through these analyst evaluations alongside other financial indicators can contribute to a holistic understanding of Texas Instruments's market standing. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/TXN/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Texas Instruments analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Unveiling the Story Behind Texas Instruments</h2>
Dallas-based Texas Instruments generates over 95% of its revenue from semiconductors and the remainder from its well-known calculators. Texas Instruments is the world's largest maker of analog chips, which are used to process real-world signals such as sound and power. Texas Instruments also has a leading market share position in processors and microcontrollers used in a wide variety of electronics applications.
<h3>Unraveling the Financial Story of Texas Instruments</h3>
Market Capitalization: With restricted market capitalization, the company is positioned below industry averages. This reflects a smaller scale relative to peers.
Revenue Growth: Texas Instruments displayed positive results in 3M. As of 31 March, 2025, the company achieved a solid revenue growth rate of approximately 11.14%. This indicates a notable increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the revenue growth lags behind its industry peers. The company achieved a growth rate lower than the average among peers in Information Technology sector.
Net Margin: Texas Instruments's net margin surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 28.98% net margin, the company effectively manages costs and achieves strong profitability.
Return on Equity (ROE): Texas Instruments's ROE excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 7.08%. This signifies robust financial management and efficient use of shareholder equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): Texas Instruments's ROA is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 3.4%, the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns from its assets.
Debt Management: The company faces challenges in debt management with a debt-to-equity ratio higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 0.78, caution is advised due to increased financial risk.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: What Are They?</h2>
Ratings come from analysts, or specialists within banking and financial systems that report for specific stocks or defined sectors (typically once per quarter for each stock). Analysts usually derive their information from company conference calls and meetings, financial statements, and conversations with important insiders to reach their decisions.
In addition to their assessments, some analysts extend their insights by offering predictions for key metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates. This supplementary information provides further guidance for traders. It is crucial to recognize that, despite their specialization, analysts are human and can only provide forecasts based on their beliefs.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantag">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Analyst Ratings

Expert Outlook: Texas Instruments Through The Eyes Of 15 Analysts

Across the recent three months, 8 analysts have shared their insights on Urban Outfitters (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/URBN#NASDAQ">URBN</a>), expressing a variety of opinions spanning from bullish to bearish.
In the table below, you'll find a summary of their recent ratings, revealing the shifting sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the previous months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">6</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The 12-month price targets, analyzed by analysts, offer insights with an average target of $58.62, a high estimate of $68.00, and a low estimate of $50.00. A decline of 2.5% from the prior average price target is evident in the current average. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1746050464_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Exploring Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Overview</h2>
In examining recent analyst actions, we gain insights into how financial experts perceive Urban Outfitters. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Ike Boruchow</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$55.00</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Boss</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
<td>$56.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Paul Lejuez</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$54.00</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adrienne Yih</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$68.00</td>
<td>$63.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mark Altschwager</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$62.00</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ike Boruchow</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dana Telsey</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$59.00</td>
<td>$56.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dana Telsey</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$56.00</td>
<td>$56.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Urban Outfitters. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Offering a comprehensive view, analysts assess stocks qualitatively, spanning from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Urban Outfitters compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts explore the dynamics of price targets, providing estimates for the future value of Urban Outfitters's stock. This examination reveals shifts in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
To gain a panoramic view of Urban Outfitters's market performance, explore these analyst evaluations alongside essential financial indicators. Stay informed and make judicious decisions using our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/URBN/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Urban Outfitters analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>About Urban Outfitters</h2>
Founded in 1970, Philadelphia-based Urban Outfitters is an apparel and home goods retailer that operates more than 700 stores and e-commerce in the United States, which accounts for about 87% of sales, and other regions. Its retail nameplates are Urban Outfitters (23% of fiscal 2025 sales), Free People/Movement (26%), and Anthropologie (44%). Retail accounted for 88% of fiscal 2025 revenue, but Urban Outfitters also sells products through a wholesale operation, owns some restaurants, and operates a fast-growing clothing rental and resale business called Nuuly (7% of sales). Urban Outfitters primarily markets to young adults and offers products in categories such as apparel (66% of sales), home goods (16% of sales), accessories (13% of sales), and more.
<h3>Urban Outfitters: A Financial Overview</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization reflects a smaller scale relative to peers. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
Positive Revenue Trend: Examining Urban Outfitters's financials over 3M reveals a positive narrative. The company achieved a noteworthy revenue growth rate of 10.09% as of 31 January, 2025, showcasing a substantial increase in top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company surpassed expectations with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Consumer Discretionary sector.
Net Margin: Urban Outfitters's net margin excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 7.35%. This signifies efficient cost management and strong financial health.
Return on Equity (ROE): The company's ROE is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in efficiently using equity capital. With an ROE of 4.99%, the company may need to address challenges in generating satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): The company's ROA is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive ROA of 2.67%, the company showcases effective utilization of assets.
Debt Management: Urban Outfitters's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average. With a ratio of 0.44, the company relies less on debt financing, maintaining a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
<h2>What Are Analyst Ratings?</h2>
Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Analysts may enhance their evaluations by incorporating forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, delivering additional guidance to investors. It is vital to acknowledge that, although experts in stocks and sectors, analysts are human and express their opinions when providing insights.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantag">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

URBN

The Analyst Verdict: Urban Outfitters In The Eyes Of 8 Experts

Providing a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish, 17 analysts have published ratings on Tapestry (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TPR#NYSE">TPR</a>) in the last three months.
The following table encapsulates their recent ratings, offering a glimpse into the evolving sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The 12-month price targets, analyzed by analysts, offer insights with an average target of $90.53, a high estimate of $110.00, and a low estimate of $80.00. Observing a 7.93% increase, the current average has risen from the previous average price target of $83.88. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1746050451_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Diving into Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Exploration</h2>
An in-depth analysis of recent analyst actions unveils how financial experts perceive Tapestry. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Ike Boruchow</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$85.00</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brooke Roach</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$84.00</td>
<td>$98.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Paul Lejuez</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$81.00</td>
<td>$95.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adrienne Yih</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$83.00</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mark Altschwager</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
<td>$93.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Daniela Nedialkova</td>
<td>Redburn Atlantic</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$110.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Boss</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$104.00</td>
<td>$88.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Boss</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$88.00</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adrienne Yih</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
<td>$87.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brooke Roach</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$98.00</td>
<td>$72.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rick Patel</td>
<td>Raymond James</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$88.00</td>
<td>$79.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Robert Drbul</td>
<td>Guggenheim</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jay Sole</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$80.00</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dana Telsey</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$92.00</td>
<td>$83.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dana Telsey</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$83.00</td>
<td>$83.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ike Boruchow</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dana Telsey</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$83.00</td>
<td>$74.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts frequently update their recommendations based on evolving market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Tapestry. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Unveiling insights, analysts deliver qualitative insights into stock performance, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Tapestry compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Gaining insights, analysts provide estimates for the future value of Tapestry's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Assessing these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators can provide a comprehensive overview of Tapestry's market position. Stay informed and make well-judged decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/TPR/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Tapestry analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Delving into Tapestry's Background</h2>
Coach, Kate Spade, and Stuart Weitzman are New York City-based Tapestry's fashion and accessory brands. The firm's products are sold through about 1,400 company-operated stores, wholesale channels, and e-commerce in North America (64% of fiscal 2024 sales), Europe, Asia, and elsewhere. Coach (76% of sales) is best known for affordable luxury leather products. Kate Spade (20%) is known for colorful patterns and graphics. Both Coach and Kate Spade specialize in women's handbags and accessories, 69% of Tapestry's fiscal 2024 sales. Stuart Weitzman (4%) generates virtually all its revenue from women's luxury footwear.
<h3>Financial Insights: Tapestry</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Above industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization emphasizes a noteworthy size, indicative of a strong market presence.
Revenue Growth: Tapestry displayed positive results in 3M. As of 31 December, 2024, the company achieved a solid revenue growth rate of approximately 5.32%. This indicates a notable increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the company achieved a growth rate higher than the average among peers in Consumer Discretionary sector.
Net Margin: Tapestry's net margin excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 14.14%. This signifies efficient cost management and strong financial health.
Return on Equity (ROE): Tapestry's ROE surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 14.38% ROE, the company effectively utilizes shareholder equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): Tapestry's ROA excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 2.96%. This signifies efficient management of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: Tapestry's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average at 3.07, reflecting a lower dependency on debt financing and a more conservative financial approach.
<h2>How Are Analyst Ratings Determined?</h2>
Analysts work in banking and financial systems and typically specialize in reporting for stocks or defined sectors. Analysts may attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter.
Beyond their standard evaluations, some analysts contribute predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, furnishing investors with additional guidance. Users of analyst ratings should be mindful that this specialized advice is shaped by human perspectives and may be subject to variability.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Expert Outlook: Tapestry Through The Eyes Of 17 Analysts

In the preceding three months, 9 analysts have released ratings for Polaris (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PII#NYSE">PII</a>), presenting a wide array of perspectives from bullish to bearish.
The table below provides a concise overview of recent ratings by analysts, offering insights into the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and drawing comparisons with the preceding months for a holistic perspective.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts provide deeper insights through their assessments of 12-month price targets, revealing an average target of $41.44, a high estimate of $56.00, and a low estimate of $30.00. This current average represents a 24.5% decrease from the previous average price target of $54.89. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1746050435_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Deciphering Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Analysis</h2>
The standing of Polaris among financial experts becomes clear with a thorough analysis of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Sabahat Khan</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$34.00</td>
<td>$54.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Craig Kennison</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Swartz</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
<td>$55.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Craig Kennison</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
<td>$56.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>James Hardiman</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Sell</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sabahat Khan</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$54.00</td>
<td>$54.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alexander Perry</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$45.00</td>
<td>$55.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Craig Kennison</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$56.00</td>
<td>$64.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Robin Farley</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$48.00</td>
<td>$67.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts frequently update their recommendations based on evolving market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Polaris. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Delving into assessments, analysts assign qualitative values, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings communicate expectations for the relative performance of Polaris compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts set price targets as an estimate of a stock's future value. Comparing the current and prior price targets provides insight into how analysts' expectations have changed over time. This information can be valuable for investors seeking to understand consensus views on the stock's potential future performance.</li>
</ul>
Capture valuable insights into Polaris's market standing by understanding these analyst evaluations alongside pertinent financial indicators. Stay informed and make strategic decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/PII/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Polaris analyst ratings.</a>
If you are interested in following small-cap stock news and performance <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/small-cap?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">you can start by tracking it here</a>.
<h2>All You Need to Know About Polaris</h2>
Polaris designs and manufactures off-road vehicles, including all-terrain vehicles and side-by-side vehicles for recreational and utility purposes, snowmobiles, and on-road vehicles, including motorcycles, along with the related replacement parts, garments, and accessories. The firm entered the marine market after acquiring Boat Holdings in 2018, offering exposure to another segment of the outdoor lifestyle market. Polaris products retailed through more than 2,500 dealers in North America and 1,500 international dealers as well as more than 25 subsidiaries and 90 distributors in more than 100 countries outside North America.
<h3>Breaking Down Polaris's Financial Performance</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: With an elevated market capitalization, the company stands out above industry averages, showcasing substantial size and market acknowledgment.
Revenue Challenges: Polaris's revenue growth over 3M faced difficulties. As of 31 December, 2024, the company experienced a decline of approximately -23.32%. This indicates a decrease in top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Consumer Discretionary sector, the company faces challenges, achieving a growth rate lower than the average among peers.
Net Margin: The company's net margin is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive net margin of 0.6%, the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): Polaris's ROE surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 0.81% ROE, the company effectively utilizes shareholder equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): Polaris's ROA excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 0.19%. This signifies efficient management of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: Polaris's debt-to-equity ratio stands notably higher than the industry average, reaching 1.71. This indicates a heavier reliance on borrowed funds, raising concerns about financial leverage.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: Simplified</h2>
Analyst ratings serve as essential indicators of stock performance, provided by experts in banking and financial systems. These specialists diligently analyze company financial statements, participate in conference calls, and engage with insiders to generate quarterly ratings for individual stocks.
In addition to their assessments, some analysts extend their insights by offering predictions for key metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates. This supplementary information provides further guidance for traders. It is crucial to recognize that, despite their specialization, analysts are human and can only provide forecasts based on their beliefs.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantag">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

9 Analysts Have This To Say About Polaris

Yangarra Resources (TSX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/YGR#TSX">YGR</a>) reported quarterly earnings of $0.05 per share which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $0.09 by 44.44 percent. This is a 44.44 percent decrease over earnings of $0.09 per share from the same period last year. The company reported quarterly sales of $34.15 million which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $35.90 million by 4.88 percent. This is a 15.53 percent decrease over sales of $40.42 million the same period last year.

Earnings

Earnings Misses

News

TSX:YGR

Yangarra Resources Q1 GAAP EPS $0.05 Misses $0.09 Estimate, Sales $34.15M Miss $35.90M Estimate

Providing a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish, 9 analysts have published ratings on Incyte (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/INCY#NASDAQ">INCY</a>) in the last three months.
The following table summarizes their recent ratings, shedding light on the changing sentiments within the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">8</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The 12-month price targets assessed by analysts reveal further insights, featuring an average target of $72.89, a high estimate of $92.00, and a low estimate of $59.00. Experiencing a 1.94% decline, the current average is now lower than the previous average price target of $74.33. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1746050425_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Exploring Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Overview</h2>
In examining recent analyst actions, we gain insights into how financial experts perceive Incyte. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Derek Archila</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$59.00</td>
<td>$58.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brian Abrahams</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$67.00</td>
<td>$64.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jessica Fye</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$68.00</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vikram Purohit</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
<td>$69.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Srikripa Devarakonda</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$72.00</td>
<td>$74.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Schmidt</td>
<td>Guggenheim</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$92.00</td>
<td>$92.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brian Abrahams</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$68.00</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Lebowitz</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$88.00</td>
<td>$97.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stephen Willey</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$77.00</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Incyte. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Unveiling insights, analysts deliver qualitative insights into stock performance, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Incyte compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts provide insights into price targets, offering estimates for the future value of Incyte's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Analyzing these analyst evaluations alongside relevant financial metrics can provide a comprehensive view of Incyte's market position. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/INCY/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Incyte analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Get to Know Incyte Better</h2>
Incyte focuses on the discovery and development of small-molecule drugs. The firm's leading drug, Jakafi, treats two types of rare blood cancer and graft versus host disease and is partnered with Novartis. Incyte's other marketed drugs include rheumatoid arthritis treatment Olumiant (licensed to Lilly), and oncology drugs Iclusig (chronic myeloid leukemia), Pemazyre (cholangiocarcinoma), Tabrecta (lung cancer), and Monjuvi (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma). The firm's first dermatology product, Opzelura, was approved in 2021 for atopic dermatitis and 2022 for vitiligo. Incyte's pipeline includes a broad array of oncology and dermatology programs.
<h3>Key Indicators: Incyte's Financial Health</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization reflects a smaller scale relative to peers. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
Revenue Growth: Incyte's revenue growth over a period of 3M has been noteworthy. As of 31 December, 2024, the company achieved a revenue growth rate of approximately 16.32%. This indicates a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Health Care sector, the company faces challenges, achieving a growth rate lower than the average among peers.
Net Margin: Incyte's net margin is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of 17.07%, the company may encounter challenges in effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): Incyte's ROE excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 6.08%. This signifies robust financial management and efficient use of shareholder equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): Incyte's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROA, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROA of 3.85%, the company showcases efficient use of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: The company maintains a balanced debt approach with a debt-to-equity ratio below industry norms, standing at 0.01.
<h2>The Basics of Analyst Ratings</h2>
Analysts work in banking and financial systems and typically specialize in reporting for stocks or defined sectors. Analysts may attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter.
Some analysts will also offer forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide further guidance on stocks. Investors who use analyst ratings should note that this specialized advice comes from humans and may be subject to error.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

INCY

9 Analysts Have This To Say About Incyte

In the current market session, Palomar Hldgs Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PLMR#NASDAQ">PLMR</a>) stock price is at $145.02, after a 1.95% drop. However, over the past month, the company's stock spiked by 2.33%, and in the past year, by 85.99%. Shareholders might be interested in knowing whether the stock is overvalued, even if the company is not performing up to par in the current session. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1746050418_0.png" alt="Past Year Chart" />

<h3>How Does Palomar Hldgs P/E Compare to Other Companies?</h3>
The P/E ratio is used by long-term shareholders to assess the company's market performance against aggregate market data, historical earnings, and the industry at large. A lower P/E could indicate that shareholders do not expect the stock to perform better in the future or it could mean that the company is undervalued. 
Palomar Hldgs has a better P/E ratio of 33.02 than the aggregate P/E ratio of 16.65 of the Insurance industry. Ideally, one might believe that Palomar Hldgs Inc. might perform better in the future than it's industry group, but it's probable that the stock is overvalued. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1746050418_1.png" alt="Guage" />

In conclusion, the price-to-earnings ratio is a useful metric for analyzing a company's market performance, but it has its limitations. While a lower P/E can indicate that a company is undervalued, it can also suggest that shareholders do not expect future growth. Additionally, the P/E ratio should not be used in isolation, as other factors such as industry trends and business cycles can also impact a company's stock price. Therefore, investors should use the P/E ratio in conjunction with other financial metrics and qualitative analysis to make informed investment decisions.

Intraday Update

Markets

PLMR

Price Over Earnings Overview: Palomar Hldgs

In the preceding three months, 14 analysts have released ratings for Toast (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TOST#NYSE">TOST</a>), presenting a wide array of perspectives from bullish to bearish.
The following table provides a quick overview of their recent ratings, highlighting the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have recently evaluated Toast and provided 12-month price targets. The average target is $43.14, accompanied by a high estimate of $50.00 and a low estimate of $29.00. Marking an increase of 2.91%, the current average surpasses the previous average price target of $41.92. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1746050416_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Exploring Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Overview</h2>
The analysis of recent analyst actions sheds light on the perception of Toast by financial experts. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Peter Heckmann</td>
<td>DA Davidson</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
<td>$42.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Josh Baer</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$46.00</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jeff Cantwell</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$39.00</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adam Frisch</td>
<td>Evercore ISI Group</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>In-Line</td>
<td>$29.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Will Nance</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$38.00</td>
<td>$43.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Daniel Perlin</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$45.00</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Hynes</td>
<td>Canaccord Genuity</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$48.00</td>
<td>$43.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tien-Tsin Huang</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$42.00</td>
<td>$36.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Timothy Chiodo</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$47.00</td>
<td>$41.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rufus Hone</td>
<td>BMO Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$48.00</td>
<td>$46.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Koning</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
<td>$38.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Josh Baer</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
<td>$46.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sanjay Sakhrani</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$42.00</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mayank Tandon</td>
<td>Needham</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Toast. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Offering insights into predictions, analysts assign qualitative values, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Toast compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Delving into movements, analysts provide estimates for the future value of Toast's stock. This analysis reveals shifts in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Understanding these analyst evaluations alongside key financial indicators can offer valuable insights into Toast's market standing. Stay informed and make well-considered decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/TOST/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Toast analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>About Toast</h2>
Toast is a US-based restaurant technology company that provides point-of-sale, payment processing, and various software services to 134,000 restaurant locations across the United States as of December 2024. The firm generates sales from software subscription fees, as a percentage take rate from each financial transaction it processes, from loan origination and servicing fees from its Toast Capital arm, and from hardware installation and professional services. Unlike competitors, Toast intermediates every payment transaction on its platform; it processed some $159 billion in gross platform volume in 2024. The firm's product offerings span point-of-sale systems, inventory and payroll management, delivery integration, e-commerce ordering, reservation management, and loyalty programs.
<h3>Key Indicators: Toast's Financial Health</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Falling below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization reflects a reduced size compared to peers. This positioning may be influenced by factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
Revenue Growth: Toast's revenue growth over a period of 3M has been noteworthy. As of 31 December, 2024, the company achieved a revenue growth rate of approximately 29.15%. This indicates a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company surpassed expectations with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Financials sector.
Net Margin: Toast's net margin is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in maintaining strong profitability. With a net margin of 2.39%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Toast's ROE falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in efficiently using equity capital. With an ROE of 2.16%, the company may face hurdles in generating optimal returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): Toast's ROA lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maximizing returns from its assets. With an ROA of 1.38%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial performance.
Debt Management: Toast's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average. With a ratio of 0.02, the company relies less on debt financing, maintaining a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
<h2>The Significance of Analyst Ratings Explained</h2>
Analysts work in banking and financial systems and typically specialize in reporting for stocks or defined sectors. Analysts may attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter.
Analysts may supplement their ratings with predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, offering investors a more comprehensive outlook. However, investors should be mindful that analysts, like any human, can have subjective perspectives influencing their forecasts.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

TOST

Forecasting The Future: 14 Analyst Projections For Toast

O'Reilly Automotive (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ORLY#NASDAQ">ORLY</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 10 years by 10.23% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 20.49%. Currently, O'Reilly Automotive has a market capitalization of $80.40 billion. 
Buying $100 In ORLY: If an investor had bought $100 of ORLY stock 10 years ago, it would be worth $635.22 today based on a price of $1410.24 for ORLY at the time of writing.
<h3>O'Reilly Automotive's Performance Over Last 10 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1746050412_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Trading Ideas

ORLY

$100 Invested In O'Reilly Automotive 10 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

Wall Street suffered a reality check during the midweek session, with reports coming in that the U.S. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/econ-s/25/04/45108426/as-growth-falters-sentiment-slips-economist-says-risks-to-the-economic-outlook-are-increasing">economy contracted for the first time</a> in three years during the beginning of 2025. 
This period coincided with a surge of imports arriving ahead of President Donald Trump's tariffs, which landed the <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/economics/macro-economic-events/25/04/45100047/recession-odds-spike-wall-street-tumbles-as-q1-gdp-surprisingly-contracts-be-patient-trump-responds">GDP in negative territory</a> in the first quarter. While the news pushed market indices into the red, tech giant IBM (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IBM#NYSE">IBM</a>) eked out a gain.
It could be a sample of potential narratives that may soon materialize into the present realm. While tech will almost certainly be a place where businesses look to make some budget cuts — along with other areas — there's a <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/long-ideas/25/03/44501515/cybersecurity-stocks-to-outperform-its-the-one-line-item-that-no-company-in-the-world-is-cutting-josh-brown">certain floor</a> when it comes to the broader IT machinery that cannot be touched. Not too long ago, Ritholtz Wealth Management's Josh Brown made a compelling argument about the cybersecurity sector.
Essentially, modern companies can't take the corporate chainsaw to certain digital infrastructural components that keep the entire machinery running. To cut cybersecurity, according to Brown, represents an "out-of-business risk."
Brown pointed to the bankruptcy of 23andMe Holding Co. (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MEHCQ#OTC">MEHCQ</a>) as an example of the dire consequences of neglecting cybersecurity resilience. The same lesson can be applied to the broader IT machinery, IBM's stronghold. Therefore, even amid the worrying macro environment, IBM stock offers reasonable insulation.
In addition, the company nicknamed Big Blue recently <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/movers/25/04/45079132/whats-going-on-with-ibm-stock-today">bumped up its regular quarterly cash dividend</a> to $1.68 per share. This increase is scheduled for payment on June 10, 2025, to shareholders on record as of May 9.
Notably, the dividend boost marks the 30th consecutive year the tech giant has raised its dividend. The company has also maintained a streak of uninterrupted payouts since 1916, thus reinforcing the economic resilience narrative.
<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Potential Demand Swing Incoming for IBM Stock</h1>
On surface level, IBM stock appears to represent a technical discount. Relative to its February closing high, the security is down by approximately 9%. At the same time, using price to project future price movements is a haphazard approach. Since price is a scalar, continuous signal, it offers no fundamental meaning.
In other words, price and demand are not the same thing. Price is merely the recording of when demand was exercised and the actual figure could theoretically be anything. In contrast, demand is a defined, discrete event. It's either happening or it's not. There are no half-demand states of existence.
Put another way, for any given trading session, the market makes a choice: it's either a net buyer, in which case demand rises, or it's not a net buyer, in which case supply rises. It's not so much about the magnitude and price point of bullishness that matters, but whether, at a particular point in time, investors saw enough of a reason to place their capital at risk.
For IBM stock, the last 10 weeks have been bearishly dominated, resulting in a "3-7" sequence: three weeks up, seven weeks down, with a negative trajectory across the period. Granted, the one-week upside probability following the 3-7 sequence only mildly favors the bulls at 51.22%.
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/30153112/IBM-stock-10wk-forecast-1024x576.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-895740" srcset="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/30153112/IBM-stock-10wk-forecast-1024x576.jpg 1024w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/30153112/IBM-stock-10wk-forecast-300x169.jpg 300w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/30153112/IBM-stock-10wk-forecast-768x432.jpg 768w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/30153112/IBM-stock-10wk-forecast.jpg 1280w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Image by author</figcaption></figure>
However, the key with IBM stock is demand resilience. In the past three years, IBM has not been able to print a consecutive 10-week series where down weeks outnumber up weeks. For example, about a year ago, IBM posted a 3-7 sequence. Subsequently, investors responded with a 6-4 and 8-2 sequence before a stalemate 5-5 sequence.
No, obviously, IBM stock is not immune to downside. However, when the pessimism is prolonged, the bulls tend to respond like clockwork.
<h1 class="wp-block-heading">An Aggressive Play on Big Blue</h1>
What's beautiful about IBM stock is that it's a hybrid opportunity. 
For those seeking income-generating shelter amid the possible economic storm, Big Blue offers an attractive idea within the tech ecosystem. At the same time, it also offers the potential — with the leverage of multi-leg options strategies — to take small gains and convert them to giant payouts.
Consider the 242.50/245 bull call spread expiring May 16 as a prime example. This transaction involves buying the $242.50 call and simultaneously selling the $245 call, for a net debit paid of $126. Should IBM stock rise through the short strike price of $245 at expiration, the maximum reward is $124, or a payout of over 98%.
The above options strategy is attractive because if IBM stock follows the projected positive pathway over the next three weeks, it should land near the $250 mark. That should provide an extra few bucks of safety margin relative to the short strike price.
Read Next: • <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/large-cap/25/04/45041909/ibm-commits-30-billion-to-rd-in-us-eyes-next-level-advances-in-mainframes-and-quantum-computing">IBM Commits $30 Billion To R&amp;D In US, Eyes Next-Level Advances In Mainframes And Quantum Computing</a> Photo: Shutterstock

Equities

Long Ideas

Dividends

Options

Movers

23ANDME HOLDING CO A by 23andMe Holding Co.

MEHCQ

Options Corner: Why Boring IBM May Be Ideal Tech Play To Ride Economic Chop

Most people think <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/22/06/27615266/elon-musk-names-two-enemies-reflects-on-creation-of-tesla-and-staving-off-bankruptcy-in-new-intervie">entrepreneurs launch billion-dollar companies</a> because they're chasing a grand vision. Elon Musk says he just couldn't land a regular job.
Speaking at the <a href="https://youtu.be/fWCCcgVwNJ0?si=X_koAoX9D-_E3UB6">Montana Jobs Summit back in 2013</a>, Musk shared the real reason he started his first internet company back in 1995 — and it wasn't because he wanted to. It was because nobody would hire him.
"The only reason I started an Internet company back in 1995 was because there were only a few internet companies and I couldn't get a job at any of them," Musk said. "I tried to get a job at Netscape and sent my resume in and tried hanging out in the lobby. But I was too shy to talk to anyone. Then I was like, okay, I guess I'll have to start a company because I can't get a job anywhere."
Don't Miss:
<ul>
<li>‘Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/mode-mobile-2">You can invest today for just $0.26/share with a $1000 minimum.</a></li>
<li>Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing —<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/boxabl"> this is your last chance to become an investor for $0.80 per share.</a></li>
</ul>
At 17, Musk left South Africa with little more than ambition and a Canadian passport, thanks to his mother's citizenship. His first jobs weren't glamorous. According to Ashlee Vance's biography "Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future," Musk started out shoveling grain bins and picking vegetables on a farm in tiny Waldeck, Saskatchewan. Population: barely 300.
After that, he graduated to cutting logs with a chainsaw in Vancouver, then took an even rougher job after asking the unemployment office what paid best. Their answer? Shoveling steaming hot, toxic gunk out of a lumber mill's boiler room.
For $18 an hour, Musk had to crawl through a <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/startups/24/10/41416221/elon-musk-spent-his-teen-years-working-odd-jobs-in-canada-for-18-an-hour-hed-clean-the-boiler-room-w">claustrophobic tunnel in a hazmat suit</a>, shoveling residue out through the same hole he entered. As Musk described it, "There is no escape. Someone else on the other side has to shovel it into a wheelbarrow. If you stay in there for more than 30 minutes, you get too hot and die."
Trending: Donald Trump Just Announced a $500 Billion AI Infrastructure Deal — <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/seize-a-share-while-you-still-can-in-the-2-trillion-entertainment-market-with-elf-labs-at-just-2-25-share">Here's How You Can Invest in the Entertainment Market's Next Big Disruptor for Just $998</a>
Of the thirty people who started the job that week, only three — including Musk — survived to the end.
Eventually, Musk decided the whole manual labor thing wasn't a long-term play. He earned degrees from the University of Pennsylvania and was accepted into Stanford's graduate program. But instead of attending, he gambled on Silicon Valley's infant internet industry.
Unfortunately, the internet wasn't quite ready to welcome him either.
Despite credentials from Wharton and acceptance into Stanford's physics program, Musk didn't have the one thing Netscape wanted: a computer science degree and software company experience.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/elon-musk-told-the-u-n-if-they-could-show-a-plan-for-ending-world-hunger-hed-donate-6-billion-i-will-sell-tesla-stock-right-now-and-do-it">Elon Musk Told The U.N. If They Could Show A Plan For Ending World Hunger He'd Donate $6 Billion – ‘I Will Sell Tesla Stock Right Now And Do It'</a>
No job offers came. Musk had no backup plan. So he built his own.
The company he launched — Zip2 — eventually sold to Compaq for roughly $300 million in 1999. From there, Musk plowed ahead: founding X.com, which evolved into PayPal, selling it to eBay for $1.5 billion, and then launching the companies that would make him <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/startups/25/01/43101102/elon-musk-the-richest-man-in-the-world-is-estimated-to-earn-over-23-million-every-single-hour-of-the-day-heres-how-hes-spending-it">the richest man in the world</a>.
It's easy to look at Musk's empire now and think it was inevitable. But it started the same way a lot of entrepreneurial stories do: with <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/personal-finance/25/01/43127899/elon-musks-ex-wife-says-he-was-bullied-by-kids-at-school-but-became-richest-man-in-the-world-so-no-one-is-throwing-soda-cans-at-him-now">rejection, discomfort, and a decision to move forward anyway</a>.
If Netscape had just hired the shy kid awkwardly loitering in their lobby, today's tech world might look very different.
Read Next:
<ul>
<li>BlackRock is calling 2025 the year of alternative assets. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/masterworks">One firm from NYC has quietly built a group of 60,000+ investors who have all joined in on an alt asset class previously exclusive to billionaires like Bezos and Gates.</a></li>
<li>Can you guess how many retire with a $5,000,000 nest egg? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/5mil-nest-egg-adv">The percentage may shock you</a>.</li>
</ul>
Image: Shutterstock

Personal Finance

Elon Musk Says He Was Too Shy to Get Hired — After Manual Labor Gigs and Failing to Land a Job, He Said: 'I Guess I'll Have to Start a Company'

The U.S. is gearing up for a <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/25/04/44880439/80-of-americans-say-the-country-would-be-better-off-with-more-manufacturing-jobs-but-only-25-want-one-themselves">major manufacturing boom</a>, with nearly 4 million new factory jobs expected to be created by 2033. However, a major hurdle is already clear: the next generation of workers doesn't seem interested.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Manufacturing Boom Meets Labor Shortage</h2>
According to <a href="https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/manufacturing/supporting-us-manufacturing-growth-amid-workforce-challenges.html">Deloitte</a>, America's manufacturing industry will need to fill 3.8 million jobs by 2033. Part of the need stems from baby boomers retiring, while new jobs are being created by growing industries like clean energy and semiconductor production.
Despite this surge, half of these positions are projected to go unfilled. A <a href="https://www.fastcompany.com/90971832/gen-z-careers-factory-manufacturing-low-pay-survey">survey</a> from Soter Analytics shows that just 14% of Gen Z say they would consider a career in industrial work.
Don't Miss:
<ul>
<li>‘Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/mode-mobile-2">You can invest today for just $0.26/share with a $1000 minimum.</a></li>
<li>Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing —<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/boxabl"> this is your last chance to become an investor for $0.80 per share.</a></li>
</ul>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why Gen Z Isn't Interested</h2>
While Gen Z is moving away from <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/personal-finance/24/12/42496912/warren-buffett-doesnt-believe-college-is-for-everyone-none-of-his-3-kids-finished-if-you-pool-their-credits-you-got-a-degree">traditional four-year college degrees</a> and embracing blue-collar work in fields like plumbing, carpentry, and electrical trades, manufacturing doesn&#8217;t seem to have the same appeal. Soter Analytics data shows that one in five Gen Zers believe industrial work pays poorly, and that perception is a key factor in their disinterest.&nbsp;
According to <a href="https://www.ziprecruiter.com/Salaries/Manufacturing-Salary">ZipRecruiter</a>, manufacturing jobs currently offer an average wage of around $25 per hour, or roughly $52,000 per year — lower than the national average salary of $62,088. Compared to the six-figure earning potential of other trades, factory work often feels like a financial step down.
Safety and flexibility also play important roles. Soter Analytics found that 26% of Gen Z workers believe industrial jobs lack flexible hours, a major drawback for a generation that prioritizes work-life balance. Concerns about physical safety further deter interest, with about a quarter of respondents viewing industrial jobs as unsafe.
Trending: BlackRock is calling 2025 the year of alternative assets. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/masterworks">One firm from NYC has quietly built a group of 60,000+ investors who have all joined in on an alt asset class previously exclusive to billionaires like Bezos and Gates.</a>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Blue-Collar Appeal — But Not on the Factory Floor</h2>
Gen Z's interest in blue-collar work is rising in general. Enrollment in trade-focused community colleges has surged, and programs in construction and HVAC work are attracting more students than ever, according to Fortune. These careers offer independence, flexible hours, and high earning potential — key priorities for young workers today.
However, manufacturing roles are often perceived as rigid, repetitive, and lacking clear advancement opportunities. In fact, 32% of Gen Z respondents told Soter Analytics they would be more interested in industrial work if it clearly led to corporate positions — suggesting that without visible career ladders, factories may continue to struggle to attract young talent.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Immigration and Policy Challenges</h2>
The <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/04/44661665/manufacturing-resurgence-not-without-a-workforce-says-blackrocks-fink">labor shortage</a> could be exacerbated further by immigration policy. As Fortune reports, America&#8217;s manufacturing industry has historically leaned on immigrant workers to fill gaps, but recent policies aimed at limiting immigration could &#8220;wreak havoc on the sector's labor supply,&#8221; particularly as boomers retire en masse.
See Also: Hasbro, MGM, and Skechers trust this AI marketing firm — <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/rad-intel">invest pre-IPO from $0.60 per share now</a>.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A Tough Road Ahead</h2>
Manufacturers are aware of the challenge. Matthew Hart, founder and CEO of Soter Analytics, explained, &#8220;There is opportunity to bring Gen Z into the industrial workforce, but employers will need to shift in a few key ways to make this transition possible.&#8221; Offering more flexible schedules, improving safety standards, and providing clearer career paths could be critical strategies.
Without these changes, even as opportunities grow, filling America's next generation of factory jobs may prove harder than ever.
Read Next:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/gbr-savings-by-age">If You're Age 35, 50, or 60: Here&#8217;s How Much You Should Have Saved Vs. Invested By Now</a></li>
<li>Inspired by Uber and Airbnb &#8211; Deloitte's fastest-growing software company is transforming 7 billion smartphones into income-generating assets &#8211; <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/mode-mobile-2">with $1,000 you can invest at just $0.26/share!</a></li>
</ul>
Image: Shutterstock

Nearly 4 Million Factory Jobs Are Coming — But Gen Z Would Rather Work In The Trades Than The Assembly Line

United States Lime (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/USLM#NASDAQ">USLM</a>) reported quarterly earnings of $1.19 per share. This is a 52.56 percent increase over earnings of $0.78 per share from the same period last year. The company reported $91.25 million in sales this quarter. This is a 27.29 percent increase over sales of $71.69 million the same period last year.

USLM

United States Lime Q1 EPS $1.19 Up From $0.78 YoY, Sales $91.25M Up From $71.69M YoY

Globe Life (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GL#NYSE">GL</a>) affirms FY2025 Adj EPS guidance from $13.45-$14.05 to $13.45-$14.05 vs $13.68 analyst estimate..

Guidance

Globe Life Affirms FY2025 Adj EPS Guidance of $13.45-$14.05 vs $13.68 Est

Invitation Homes (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/INVH#NYSE">INVH</a>) affirms FY2025 FFO guidance from $1.88-$1.94 to $1.88-$1.94 vs $1.92 analyst estimate..

INVH

Invitation Homes Affirms FY2025 FFO Guidance of $1.88-$1.94 vs $1.92 Est

Magyar Bancorp (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MGYR#NASDAQ">MGYR</a>) reported quarterly earnings of $0.43 per share. This is a 43.33 percent increase over earnings of $0.30 per share from the same period last year. The company reported $9.14 million in sales this quarter. This is a 21.19 percent increase over sales of $7.54 million the same period last year.

MGYR

Magyar Bancorp Q2 EPS $0.43 Up From $0.30 YoY, Sales $9.14M Up From $7.54M YoY

Medallion Bank (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MBNKP#NASDAQ">MBNKP</a>) reported quarterly earnings of $0.50 per share. This is a 19.05 percent increase over earnings of $0.42 per share from the same period last year. The company reported $63.01 million in sales this quarter. This is a 18.18 percent increase over sales of $53.32 million the same period last year.

MBNKP

Medallion Bank Q1 GAAP EPS $0.50 Up From $0.42 YoY, Sales $63.01M Up From $53.32M YoY

<a href="https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0126">https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0126</a>

General

'Treasury Announces Agreement to Establish United States-Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund'

Icon (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ICLR#NASDAQ">ICLR</a>) lowers FY2025 Adj EPS guidance from $13.00-$15.00 to $12.75-$14.25 vs $13.66 analyst estimate. Lowers FY2025 sales outlook from $8.05 billion-$8.65 billion to $7.75 billion-$8.15 billion vs $8.25 billion estimate.

ICLR

Icon Lowers FY2025 Adj EPS Guidance from $13.00-$15.00 to $12.75-$14.25 vs $13.66 Est; Lowers FY2025 Sales Guidance from $8.05B-$8.65B to $7.75B-$8.15B vs $8.25B Est

Jefferies analyst Julien Dumoulin-Smith downgrades First Solar (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FSLR#NASDAQ">FSLR</a>) from Buy to Hold and lowers the price target from $202 to $127.

Comments

NetPay Intl

NetPay Intl (NTPY) Opzioni

No option chain data available. Please try again later

Notizie

PARTNER/COLLABORATORE

BENZINGA NEL MONDO