La vendita allo scoperto per Allstate dà agli investitori un'idea del grado in cui gli investitori stanno scommettendo sul declino delle azioni di Allstate. I dati relativi alle vendite allo scoperto vengono aggiornati ogni due settimane.

Allstate (NYSE:ALL) Azioni, Report sulle vendite allo scoperto

ALLSTATE CORP

Allstate

Allstate is one of the largest US property-casualty insurers in the US. Personal auto represents the largest percentage of revenue, but the company offers homeowners insurance and other insurance products. Allstate products are sold in North America primarily by about 6,000 exclusive agents.

News

General

I recenti incendi a Los Angeles hanno sollevato interrogativi sugli effetti finanziari per le principali società di assicurazione.

Quale impatto avrà l&#39;incendio di Los Angeles sulle azioni di Berkshire Hathaway?

Allstate's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>) short percent of float has risen 12.71% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 4.72 million shares sold short, which is 2.04% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 2.22 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>Allstate Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1752602443_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Allstate has grown since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to fall in the near-term but traders should be aware that more shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing Allstate's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>, Allstate's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 2.87%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Short Sellers

Short Ideas

Trading Ideas

How Do Investors Really Feel About Allstate?

Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods analyst Meyer Shields maintains Allstate (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>) with a Outperform and raises the price target from $235 to $237.

Price Target

Analyst Ratings

Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Maintains Outperform on Allstate, Raises Price Target to $237

UBS analyst Brian Meredith maintains Allstate (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>) with a Buy and raises the price target from $230 to $235.

UBS Maintains Buy on Allstate, Raises Price Target to $235

In the latest quarter, 8 analysts provided ratings for Allstate (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>), showcasing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.
The following table provides a quick overview of their recent ratings, highlighting the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have set 12-month price targets for Allstate, revealing an average target of $216.88, a high estimate of $250.00, and a low estimate of $172.00. Marking an increase of 1.17%, the current average surpasses the previous average price target of $214.38. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1751925631_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Analyzing Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Breakdown</h2>
An in-depth analysis of recent analyst actions unveils how financial experts perceive Allstate. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Alex Scott</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$188.00</td>
<td>$172.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Meyer Shields</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$235.00</td>
<td>$228.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bob Huang</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$235.00</td>
<td>$225.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Elyse Greenspan</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$197.00</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>C. Gregory Peters</td>
<td>Raymond James</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Strong Buy</td>
<td>$250.00</td>
<td>$240.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oliver Wintermantel</td>
<td>Evercore ISI Group</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$230.00</td>
<td>$227.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alex Scott</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$172.00</td>
<td>$183.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Meyer Shields</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$228.00</td>
<td>$240.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: In response to dynamic market conditions and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their reaction to recent developments related to Allstate. This insight gives a snapshot of analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analyzing trends, analysts offer qualitative evaluations, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Allstate compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts predict movements in price targets, offering estimates for Allstate's future value. Examining the current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
For valuable insights into Allstate's market performance, consider these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators. Stay well-informed and make prudent decisions using our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/ALL/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Allstate analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>About Allstate</h2>
Allstate is one of the largest US property-casualty insurers in the US. Personal auto represents the largest percentage of revenue, but the company offers homeowners insurance and other insurance products. Allstate products are sold in North America primarily by about 6,000 exclusive agents.
<h3>Allstate: A Financial Overview</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization surpasses industry averages, showcasing a dominant size relative to peers and suggesting a strong market position.
Positive Revenue Trend: Examining Allstate's financials over 3M reveals a positive narrative. The company achieved a noteworthy revenue growth rate of 7.91% as of 31 March, 2025, showcasing a substantial increase in top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company stands out with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Financials sector.
Net Margin: Allstate's net margin falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of 3.44%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Allstate's ROE lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maximizing returns on equity capital. With an ROE of 2.87%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial performance.
Return on Assets (ROA): Allstate's ROA is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 0.5%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Debt Management: The company faces challenges in debt management with a debt-to-equity ratio higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 0.4, caution is advised due to increased financial risk.
<h2>What Are Analyst Ratings?</h2>
Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Analysts may enhance their evaluations by incorporating forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, delivering additional guidance to investors. It is vital to acknowledge that, although experts in stocks and sectors, analysts are human and express their opinions when providing insights.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Assessing Allstate: Insights From 8 Financial Analysts

Asset Sales

Allstate Completes $1.25B Sale Of Group Health Business To Nationwide, Generating $500M Book Gain

Oaktree Capital Management co-chairman <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/howard-marks" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Howard Marks</a> revised the government interventions in Wednesday's memo titled "Shall We Repeal the Laws of Economics?"
The billionaire investor, known for his outstanding investments in distressed debt, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.oaktreecapital.com/insights/memo/more-on-repealing-the-laws-of-economics" rel="noreferrer noopener">argued</a> that economic systems operate on fundamental laws, such as supply and demand and incentives, and while these laws aren't perfect, trying to bypass them often creates greater harm than good.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Effects of Rent Control</h2>
"Governments are choosing winners and losers, rather than letting market forces do so."
Marks considers rent control as a typical example of a well-intended policy clashing with an economic reality. When demand for apartments exceeds supply, rising rents are inevitable. Politicians often step in to cap these increases to protect existing tenants, ensuring constituents aren't displaced and neighborhoods remain intact. This action pleases voters, helping the officials solidify their position. But this "solution" only makes a subset of people happy.
"Landlords are unhappy about not being able to charge the full rent they could charge in a free market," Marks explains, leading them to stop investing in properties or remove them from the market entirely.
Developers turn away from building new housing in these areas, fearing insufficient returns. Meanwhile, those who can afford market rents often struggle to find vacant units due to rent-controlled occupants.
The inability to monetize the benefit of cheap rent means tenants stay put, reducing mobility. Rent control suppresses both the upkeep and creation of new housing, leading to deterioration in the housing stock and limiting economic productivity.
"Governments can limit the rents landlords can charge&#8230;but they can't make developers build new ones," he concludes. A policy designed to promote fairness ends up entrenching inequality and reducing opportunity.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Insurance and California Regulations</h2>
"You can limit the price insurers can charge for coverage, but you can't make them provide coverage at that price."
Marks views the development of the fire insurance market in California as a case study of what happens when regulation ignores economic fundamentals. In response to rising wildfire risks, California's regulators limited the premiums insurers could charge, hoping to protect homeowners. However, Marks believes the move catastrophically backfired.
With the assistance of Perplexity AI, Marks outlined that insurers were not allowed to use forward-looking risk models, relying instead on outdated 20-year historical data, even as fires were becoming more frequent and destructive. They were also restricted from raising rates in line with increasing reinsurance costs.
As a result, companies like Chubb (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CB#NYSE">CB</a>), Allstate (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>), and State Farm exited the California market or ceased writing new policies altogether. Those that remained raised premiums significantly, and some homeowners saw annual rates quadruple.
The government issued temporary moratoriums on policy cancellations, but these only applied post-disaster, not before. Consequently, many affected by the 2025 fires were underinsured or uninsured, a painful outcome of misguided regulation. The FAIR Plan, California's insurer of last resort, became overburdened and offered only limited, expensive coverage. The deeper issue was that while regulators could dictate pricing, they couldn't compel insurers to provide products that guaranteed losses.
"If a $5 million house has a 1% probability of burning down&#8230;and the regulator says you can only charge $25,000, what will you do? You don't write that policy," Marks remarks.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Are Tariffs the Answer?</h2>
"Progress takes countries up the curve from subsistence to prosperity, and along the way, they transition from agriculture to manufacturing to service-based economies. That happened everywhere. It wasn't just in the United States."
Turning to tariffs, Marks provides a nuanced analysis. Tariffs, often promoted as a means of protecting domestic industries and securing supply chains, are essentially taxes on imports. He concedes that tariffs might achieve goals like supporting U.S. manufacturing, reducing the trade deficit, and deterring unfair foreign practices. But the tradeoffs are substantial.
Consumers face higher prices, domestic producers may lose their incentive to innovate, and American exports can suffer as retaliatory measures take effect. Tariffs create artificial advantages that shield local industries from competition but at a cost to consumers and global efficiency.
"They impede foreign competition, enabling domestic manufacturers to sell their products even if they represent an inferior bargain," Marks notes.
Turning to the past, he references historian Niall Ferguson, who argues that industrial decline in the U.S. was inevitable due to <a target="_blank" href="https://appropriations.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-appropriations.house.gov/files/migrated/UploadedFiles/03.28.12_CJS_-_American_Manufacturing_and_Job_Repatriation_-_Niall_Ferguson_-_Testimony.pdf" rel="noreferrer noopener">structural economic evolution</a>. As GDP rises, manufacturing employment naturally declines and shifts to services.
"We cannot go back to the 1950s&#8230;not socially, and not economically," Ferguson states. According to Marks, even if manufacturing in America is nostalgic and symbolic, it isn't economically viable on a broad scale due to significantly higher costs.
However, he acknowledges that targeted tariffs might be justified in cases of national security or against countries engaging in unfair trade practices. But attempting full-scale reshoring of production through blanket tariffs? – That tradeoff would come at the expense of domestic consumers and global welfare.
Read Next:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/health-care/25/06/46019567/mark-cuban-says-were-he-to-become-president-for-a-day-he-would-make-these-two-simple-moves-to-overhaul-us-healthcare" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mark Cuban Says Were He To Become President For A Day, He Would Make These Two Simple Moves To Overhaul US Healthcare</a></li>
</ul>
Photo by Dmitry Kalinovsky via Shutterstock

Government

Regulations

Economics

Insurance

Billionaire Investor Howard Marks Says 'Even If Manufacturing In America Is Nostalgic And Symbolic, It Isn't Economically Viable'

No one likes a flip-flopper, whether in politics or stocks. When a stock can't make up its mind on a direction or trend, it can drive investors to abandon their positions in search of greener pastures.&nbsp;
This can create headaches in other areas, such as tax bills, trading fees, and overtrading, which can all be very costly. If you believe in a company&#8217;s long-term prospects but think in the short term that the stock will keep going sideways, there&#8217;s a better strategy than selling.
There&#8217;s a trading strategy that can let you collect income while you wait for the stock to grow to its full potential.
The strategy in question &#8211; covered calls &#8211; is used to earn income from a range-bound asset by selling a call option on a stock you already own. In this trade, you would sell a call option with a strike price slightly above the stock's current market price and collect the upfront premium. Your obligation to the option buyer is "covered" by the 100 shares you already own. If the strike price is reached and the call is exercised, you deliver 100 shares to the buyer and retain the premium.
However, if the call expires without hitting the strike, you keep the stock and pocket the premium as a profit. The upside is limited, but your downside risk is protected by collecting the premium and owning the stock.
A covered call is a neutral strategy, so your max profit is limited to the option premium. If the stock price increases too much, the option buyer will exercise the contract and claim the shares you hold at the strike price. And if the stock declines, the income from the option premium offsets some of your losses.
Today, we'll examine five stocks exhibiting range-bound behavior that could be suitable candidates for covered calls over the next few months. If you own any of the companies listed below, consider whether a covered call strategy aligns with your investment goals and risk tolerance.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">JM Smucker Co. </h2>
JM Smucker (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SJM#NYSE">SJM</a>) makes popular snack treats and coffee, such as Uncrustables, Folgers, Carnation, and JIF, along with pet food brands like Meow Mix and Milk-Bone. The company has had uneven revenue over the last few years, and profit margins have sagged from the consistent 7-9% figures produced from 2021 to 2023.
<figure class="wp-block-image"><img decoding="async" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXdOLILELt0easPJVO3FPlgkXTVdp87VMIYzaJFJF9u-qW7TwyKSBxEC56eE0xgruqTv_xEpxJz2ZHrYcHR9jdqwlsv4F7qRPe8Rfdf4gOKePiGVISfwQxXNLkoDVQq_wXgr9qrg7g?key=Vna2qS5bZFcM3OU-gqusIA" alt="" /></figure>
The stock has struggled as well, trading in a downtrending range for the better part of the last 18 months. While revenue growth has been spotty, the company appeals to income investment thanks to a 3.8% yield and 27 years of consecutive payout increases. On the daily chart, the RSI shows that the range-bound trading is likely to continue, making SJM a strong covered call candidate. The call option strike price should be set above the upper trendline on the chart, and investors can collect both dividend income and option premium. 
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Fed's About To Move The Market—Here's How Chris Capre Is Trading It</h2>
On June 11 at 6 PM ET, Chris Capre is going live to break down how he's preparing for the next Fed decision—before it hits and after the market reacts. You'll get his full options strategy, including pre-FOMC setups, post-reaction frameworks, and the tickers he's targeting for fast-moving trades. Secure your spot for free right <a href="https://events2.benzinga.com/chris-capre-webinar-wed-june11-2025/?utm_campaign=webinar061125&amp;utm_adType=RD051025&amp;utm_ad=061125">HERE</a>.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Ford Motor Co. </h2>
It's been a rough few years for Ford (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/F#NYSE">F</a>). The stock made new all-time highs during the 2021 bull market but lagged behind during the recovery from the 2022 bear market. The stock has been range-bound since mid-2022, trading between $9 and $15 for the better part of three years.
<figure class="wp-block-image"><img decoding="async" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXePqqBCpRXN0Y7hol45T9gqw7XXm8KACWYRLlW0CH-cS_hn7tqu8nrNhXAr4vK7tfqVD4OrjgFJTTTgVvcL6znjpHTdQMJ3zHPbpKPTgcHzUMLQiMyxMsLnhG0ES4cUu3vif0AO8A?key=Vna2qS5bZFcM3OU-gqusIA" alt="" /></figure>
Ford shares could continue trading in this range even longer as the company's electrification goals will take years. Tariffs could also hit the Big Three automakers hard, although Ford has more domestic production than competitors like GM. With a Price-to-Earnings ratio under nine and a dividend yield over 7%, the stock is attractive to value investors, but it&#8217;s hard to get overly bullish on a stock facing so many potential headwinds. Ford is currently trading near the lower bound of its range, which means less premium collected on the call option, but also a slimmer chance of the stock reaching the strike price (which should be set around the $15 resistance level). 
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Colgate-Palmolive Co. </h2>
Consumer staples companies like Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CL#NYSE">CL</a>) make decent covered call candidates since they often have thin margins, steady demand, and low beta stocks. In other words, they don&#8217;t move much. However, CL shares make a different type of candidate as the stock's range has been narrowing in a wedge pattern, which could signal a consolidation of capital preparing to alter the current trend.
<figure class="wp-block-image"><img decoding="async" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXcieA8vY92exaX52Nb2uad0_5EgocO70FInhRxzV0KJ0rw9xtSkfiqxuuADK5dtgMn18SaXGbhjc6zW4bJe8NBOx1DVS9OEinfNl2Zo1713WoAYJC0jAbUE0orMznT72lx3lKJz1w?key=Vna2qS5bZFcM3OU-gqusIA" alt="" /></figure>
However, CL's wedge still has a wide range, and the stock is currently bumping up against the upper bound. Here's why CL is a good covered call candidate: if the stock fails to break above the trendline, it indicates the trend breakout isn't imminent, and the premium collected from selling a call at this level will be hefty. If the stock does break through the trendline, the trade idea can (and should) be aborted.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Walt Disney Co. </h2>
Disney (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DIS#NYSE">DIS</a>) has seen its own share of highs and lows over the last few years. Like Ford, the company has failed to recapture its all-time highs from 2021 and lagged the S&amp;P 500 as stocks recovered in 2023 and 2024. However, the company is seeing a revival of its theme park businesses and profit margins have expanded for four consecutive quarters. 
<figure class="wp-block-image"><img decoding="async" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXfpLcfj-v5EFnOWJvyaEEQ5aNKnyEvirt8IlccF_nQdoDnAJ9EdSFYGKSa9g0VEe5tb8g-rqeXFF6WHvq19OUl2dnovK8t3RpyxGsHcWxH5HahnqQ6zgr2sK0qjMVVa3YKS-yU7?key=Vna2qS5bZFcM3OU-gqusIA" alt="" /></figure>
So why is Disney stuck in this long-term range? Despite revenue expansion, Disney+ subscriber growth is actually starting to decline, and the company continues to struggle to find direction for sports properties like ESPN. The stock hasn't traded above $123 per share since August 2022, and the current market price is right at the resistance level of the range. Despite gains of more than 20% this month, Disney could be tapped out, making it ideal for a covered call if you own it.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Allstate Corp. </h2>
Allstate (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>) reached a new all-time high as recently as March, and placing a resistance trendline at an all-time high can be risky when trading. But this is the third time ALL shares have approached this level; the first two attempts failed to continue the momentum. The more attempts a stock makes to break a resistance level, the stronger that level becomes. A third failure could be bad news for shareholders.
<figure class="wp-block-image"><img decoding="async" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXcNOFR_urReKPRZbHDQTKSWlvvgPZF1ZItZ-wkaUsGvmm75gQ1zG5uaN-JyINkWUhiNwUHmiQieGeA474tsCbqu7k2TU-xexByziafPa-uECQablzgqQrLl17S1QHrlfIHc6hZcdw?key=Vna2qS5bZFcM3OU-gqusIA" alt="" /></figure>
A covered call can protect your investment should the stock fail to breach the $213 level again. If the stock does make a new all-time high, don't write the call; enjoy the profits you earn from owning it. But if it looks like the stock has once again failed to break through and trends lower, the premium collected from selling the call can help offset the retreat back to support.
Editorial content from our expert contributors is intended to be information for the general public and not individualized investment advice. Editors/contributors are presenting their individual opinions and strategies, which are neither expressly nor impliedly approved or endorsed by Benzinga.
Photo: Shutterstock

Personal Finance

5 Best Stocks To Trade For Income

WIIM

Shares of auto-insurance companies are trading lower after a Goldman Sachs note indicated that insurance costs are projected to decline due to disruptions from self-driving cars, which may result in fewer accidents and shifting risks.

Self-driving cars are poised to disrupt the $430-billion U.S. auto insurance market, according to Goldman Sachs, as fewer accidents and shifting risks could cut insurance costs by more than half over <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/expert-ideas">the next 15 years.</a>
In a research note shared Monday, Goldman analyst Mark Delaney indicated that insurance costs are projected to decline from roughly $0.50 per mile in 2025 to just $0.23 per mile by 2040.
That compression could severely challenge the current economics of the insurance sector.
&#8220;Autonomy could significantly reduce the number of auto accidents, particularly those caused by human error,&#8221; Delaney stated. 
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Autonomous Vehicles Threaten Auto Insurance Model, But Industry Has Time To Adjust</h3>
The U.S. auto insurance market stands at around $432 billion today, including $360 billion in personal coverage and $72 billion in commercial.
 As vehicles become safer and smarter, Goldman sees a major transformation in how risk is priced and how legal liability is assigned.
"The two primary long-term risks to auto insurers, are declines in accident frequency and changes in claim costs and legal liability," Delaney said.
Autonomy, especially through Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), is already reducing accident frequency while simultaneously pushing up repair costs due to increasingly complex vehicles. 
Goldman forecasts that even with declining accident rates, a modest rise in total vehicle count and higher cost per claim—driven by both tech-heavy cars and litigation—will support modest premium growth over the next 10 to 15 years.
&#8220;We expect a continuation of the modest real growth that the auto insurance market has produced over recent decades/years, driven by increases in the number of vehicles and above-CPI increases in cost per claim,&#8221; Delaney said. 
While the long-term outlook for autonomous vehicles shows potential growth, the Global X Autonomous &amp; Electric Vehicles ETF (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DRIV#NASDAQ">DRIV</a>) has slipped 7% year-to-date, still reflecting some market skepticism.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Will Robotaxis Kill Traditional Insurance?</h3>
Self-driving vehicles are creating both threats and opportunities for the car insurance industry. Goldman estimates that the market for robotaxi insurance could reach $1 billion to $1.5 billion by 2030, still a small fraction of the broader market.
Yet, new players may enter the market posing a competitive threat to established insurers. 
&#8220;Some larger companies in the AV space could self-insure,&#8221; the note said, thus reducing the commercial opportunity for traditional insurers such as Progressive Corp. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PGR#NYSE">PGR</a>) and Allstate Corp. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>). 
Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSLA#NASDAQ">TSLA</a>), General Motors Co. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GM#NYSE">GM</a>), and Rivian Automotive Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RIVN#NASDAQ">RIVN</a>) are already offering insurance, though mainly on a small scale. Tesla earned about $317 million in insurance revenue in 2024, while Rivian partners with underwriters like Nationwide and Progressive to avoid taking on risk directly.
More than just who underwrites coverage, the very nature of auto insurance could change. 
According to Goldman Sachs, autonomy could shift insurance from covering driver error to managing product liability and cyber risks—areas that fall outside the traditional underwriting expertise of most insurers. 
Traditional insurers may need to invest in new capabilities to stay competitive, while automakers looking to expand into insurance will have to prove they can manage risk profitably without adding balance sheet losses.
Read Next:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/treasuries/25/06/45798569/think-5-yields-will-crush-stock-market-goldman-sachs-says-think-again">Think 5% Yields Will Crush Stock Market? Goldman Sachs Says Think Again </a></li>
</ul>
Image created using artificial intelligence via Midjourney.

Analyst Color

Equities

Large Cap

Mid Cap

Sector ETFs

ETFs

DRIV

RIVN

TSLA

Self-Driving Cars May Slash Insurance Costs 50% By 2040, Challenge Traditional Insurers: Goldman Sachs

8 analysts have expressed a variety of opinions on Allstate (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>) over the past quarter, offering a diverse set of opinions from bullish to bearish.
The table below offers a condensed view of their recent ratings, showcasing the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Insights from analysts' 12-month price targets are revealed, presenting an average target of $221.12, a high estimate of $250.00, and a low estimate of $172.00. This current average reflects an increase of 0.51% from the previous average price target of $220.00. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1749218416_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Exploring Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Overview</h2>
The perception of Allstate by financial experts is analyzed through recent analyst actions. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meyer Shields</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$235.00</td>
<td>$228.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bob Huang</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$235.00</td>
<td>$225.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Elyse Greenspan</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$197.00</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>C. Gregory Peters</td>
<td>Raymond James</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Strong Buy</td>
<td>$250.00</td>
<td>$240.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oliver Wintermantel</td>
<td>Evercore ISI Group</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$230.00</td>
<td>$227.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alex Scott</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$172.00</td>
<td>$183.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Meyer Shields</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$228.00</td>
<td>$240.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jimmy Bhullar</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$222.00</td>
<td>$217.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts frequently update their recommendations based on evolving market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Allstate. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Offering a comprehensive view, analysts assess stocks qualitatively, spanning from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Allstate compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Understanding forecasts, analysts offer estimates for Allstate's future value. Examining the current and prior targets provides insight into analysts' changing expectations.</li>
</ul>
For valuable insights into Allstate's market performance, consider these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators. Stay well-informed and make prudent decisions using our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/ALL/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Allstate analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Delving into Allstate's Background</h2>
Allstate is one of the largest US property-casualty insurers in the US. Personal auto represents the largest percentage of revenue, but the company offers homeowners insurance and other insurance products. Allstate products are sold in North America primarily by about 6,000 exclusive agents.
<h3>Key Indicators: Allstate's Financial Health</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization surpasses industry averages, showcasing a dominant size relative to peers and suggesting a strong market position.
Revenue Growth: Allstate's remarkable performance in 3M is evident. As of 31 March, 2025, the company achieved an impressive revenue growth rate of 7.91%. This signifies a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company surpassed expectations with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Financials sector.
Net Margin: Allstate's net margin is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in maintaining strong profitability. With a net margin of 3.44%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Allstate's ROE is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of 2.87%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Return on Assets (ROA): Allstate's ROA is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 0.5%, the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns from its assets.
Debt Management: The company faces challenges in debt management with a debt-to-equity ratio higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 0.4, caution is advised due to increased financial risk.
<h2>The Basics of Analyst Ratings</h2>
Analyst ratings serve as essential indicators of stock performance, provided by experts in banking and financial systems. These specialists diligently analyze company financial statements, participate in conference calls, and engage with insiders to generate quarterly ratings for individual stocks.
Beyond their standard evaluations, some analysts contribute predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, furnishing investors with additional guidance. Users of analyst ratings should be mindful that this specialized advice is shaped by human perspectives and may be subject to variability.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantag">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

William Blair analyst Adam Klauber initiates coverage on Allstate (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>) with a Sector Outperform rating.

Initiation

William Blair Initiates Coverage On Allstate with Sector Outperform Rating

Allstate (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 15 years by 1.77% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 13.77%. Currently, Allstate has a market capitalization of $54.82 billion. 
Buying $100 In ALL: If an investor had bought $100 of ALL stock 15 years ago, it would be worth $677.05 today based on a price of $206.77 for ALL at the time of writing.
<h3>Allstate's Performance Over Last 15 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747407651_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Here's How Much You Would Have Made Owning Allstate Stock In The Last 15 Years

Allstate Announces Estimated Catastrophe Losses For The Month Of April Of $594M Or $469M, After-Tax. Catastrophe Losses For April Include 11 Events With ~60% Of The Losses Related To Two Geographically Widespread Wind And Hail Events

Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods analyst Meyer Shields maintains Allstate (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>) with a Outperform and raises the price target from $228 to $235.

Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Maintains Outperform on Allstate, Raises Price Target to $235

Allstate (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 15 years by 1.8% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 12.79%. Currently, Allstate has a market capitalization of $53.36 billion. 
Buying $1000 In ALL: If an investor had bought $1000 of ALL stock 15 years ago, it would be worth $6,145.34 today based on a price of $201.26 for ALL at the time of writing.
<h3>Allstate's Performance Over Last 15 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1746549918_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

If You Invested $1000 In This Stock 15 Years Ago, You Would Have This Much Today

Morgan Stanley analyst Bob Huang maintains Allstate (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>) with a Overweight and raises the price target from $225 to $235.

Morgan Stanley Maintains Overweight on Allstate, Raises Price Target to $235

Wells Fargo analyst Elyse Greenspan maintains Allstate (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>) with a Equal-Weight and lowers the price target from $200 to $197.

Wells Fargo Maintains Equal-Weight on Allstate, Lowers Price Target to $197

Raymond James analyst C. Gregory Peters reiterates Allstate (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>) with a Strong Buy and raises the price target from $240 to $250.

Reiteration

Raymond James Reiterates Strong Buy on Allstate, Raises Price Target to $250

Editor&#8217;s Note: The article has been udpated to correct the Stock Movers list.
Wall Street pushed higher in midday trading, with the S&amp;P 500 on track for its eighth consecutive gain — its longest winning streak since November 2023. The index rose about 1% to 5,560, fully recovering the losses sustained after former President Donald Trump announced <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/tariffs">trade tariffs on April 2.</a>
Technology stocks led the rally, with the Nasdaq 100 climbing 1.5%. Strong and resilient corporate earnings continue to fuel investor appetite for risk, helping markets shrug off recent tariff concerns.
President Trump reassured investors, stating that progress on trade negotiations is going "very well" and that the timeline for the tax bill remains on schedule.
On the economic front, data continued to paint a weaker picture. After Wednesday's disappointing first-quarter GDP report, the ISM manufacturing PMI showed factory activity contracted for the second straight month in April. Meanwhile, price pressures surged at the fastest pace since June 2022, reflecting <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/economics/macro-economic-events/25/05/45139383/us-manufacturing-activity-contracts-in-april-as-tariffs-push-input-prices-toward-3-year-highs">inflationary effects from tariffs.</a>
Microsoft Corp. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NYSE">MSFT</a>) was a standout gainer, soaring 8.60% after delivering a blowout quarter that beat expectations across the board, reinforcing its leadership in cloud and AI. The stock reached its highest level since late January.
Meta Platforms Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) also topped estimates, with shares climbing more than 4%.
Sector-wise, technology outperformed, while health care lagged. Eli Lilly And Co. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LLY#NYSE">LLY</a>) plunged over 9% after the pharmaceutical giant cut its 2025 guidance.
Crude oil erased early losses, rebounding to $58 per barrel after briefly dipping below $57. Gold slipped 2.2% to a two-week low.
The U.S. dollar strengthened to its highest level in over two weeks, bolstered by manufacturing surveys showing rising input costs tied to tariffs.
Treasury yields climbed for a second straight session, with the 10-year yield rising to 4.21%.
Bitcoin (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/btc/usd">BTC</a>) surged past the $97,000 mark, hitting its highest level in over two months.
<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Thursday&#8217;s Performance In Major U.S. Indices, ETFs</h1>
<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"> 
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Major Indices</td>
<td>Price</td>
<td>% chg.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nasdaq 100</td>
<td>19,853.70</td>
<td>+ 1.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>S&amp;P 500</td>
<td>5,614.89</td>
<td>+ 0.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell 2000</td>
<td>1,971.76</td>
<td>+ 0.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dow Jones</td>
<td>40,802.25</td>
<td>+ 0.3%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Updated by 12:55 p.m. ET</figcaption></figure>
According to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/?utm_source=BZprocontent&amp;t=be2bearmibe3na1">Benzinga Pro</a>&nbsp;data:
<ul>
<li>The&nbsp;SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SPY#NYSE">SPY</a>) rose 1% to $560.02.</li>
<li>The&nbsp;SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DIA#NYSE">DIA</a>) rose 0.5% to $408.25.</li>
<li>The tech-heavy&nbsp;Invesco QQQ Trust Series&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/QQQ#NASDAQ">QQQ</a>)&nbsp;rose 1.6% to $483.23.</li>
<li>The&nbsp;iShares Russell 2000 ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IWM#NYSE">IWM</a>) inched 0.5% higher to $195.71.</li>
<li>The&nbsp;Technology&nbsp;Select Sector SPDR Fund (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/XLK#NYSE">XLK</a>) outperformed, up 2.6%; the&nbsp;Health Care&nbsp;Select Sector SPDR Fund&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/XLV#NYSE">XLV</a>) lagged, down 2.3%.</li>
</ul>
<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Thursday&#8217;s Stock Movers</h1>
Stocks reacting to earnings reports included: Microsoft Corporation: up 8.30% Meta Platforms, Inc.: up 4.29% Eli Lilly And Co&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LLY#NYSE">LLY</a>): &#8211; 9.88% Mastercard Incorporated&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MA#NYSE">MA</a>): -0.20% McDonald's Corporation&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MCD#NYSE">MCD</a>): -1.24% Linde plc&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LIN#NASDAQ">LIN</a>): -1.14% Qualcomm Inc&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/QCOM#NASDAQ">QCOM</a>): -8.28% KKR &amp; Co. Inc.&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KKR#NYSE">KKR</a>): up 1.19% The Southern Company&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SO#NYSE">SO</a>): up 0.22% Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ICE#NYSE">ICE</a>): up 1.83% KLA Corporation&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KLAC#NASDAQ">KLAC</a>): -2.43% CVS Health Corporation&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CVS#NYSE">CVS</a>): up 6.23% Equinix, Inc.&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/EQIX#NASDAQ">EQIX</a>): -0.16% Parker-Hannifin Corporation&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PH#NYSE">PH</a>): up 0.70% Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/APD#NYSE">APD</a>): -0.09% Howmet Aerospace Inc.&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HWM#NYSE">HWM</a>): up 7.44% Carrier Global Corporation&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CARR#NYSE">CARR</a>): up 11% Aflac Incorporated&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AFL#NYSE">AFL</a>): -4% Public Storage&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PSA#NYSE">PSA</a>): -0.18% The Allstate Corporation&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>): -1.27% MetLife, Inc.&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MET#NYSE">MET</a>): up 0.47% W.W. Grainger, Inc.&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GWW#NYSE">GWW</a>): Up 2.14% Becton, Dickinson and Company&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BDX#NYSE">BDX</a>): -15.73% Quanta Services, Inc.&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PWR#NYSE">PWR</a>): up 10.10% Exelon Corporation&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/EXC#NASDAQ">EXC</a>): -0.33% Dominion Energy, Inc.&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/D#NYSE">D</a>): up 0.91%
Stocks slated to report earnings after the bell include Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>), Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>), Amgen Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMGN#NASDAQ">AMGN</a>), Arthur J. Gallagher &amp; Co. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AJG#NYSE">AJG</a>), Airbnb Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ABNB#NASDAQ">ABNB</a>), Atlassian Corp (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TEAM#NASDAQ">TEAM</a>), Motorola Solutions Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSI#NYSE">MSI</a>), EOG Resources Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/EOG#NYSE">EOG</a>), American International Group Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AIG#NYSE">AIG</a>), Consolidated Edison Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ED#NYSE">ED</a>), Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IR#NYSE">IR</a>), DexCom Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DXCM#NASDAQ">DXCM</a>), Monolithic Power Systems Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MPWR#NASDAQ">MPWR</a>), Ameren Corp. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AEE#NYSE">AEE</a>), GoDaddy Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GDDY#NYSE">GDDY</a>), Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MTD#NYSE">MTD</a>), MicroStrategy Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSTR#NASDAQ">MSTR</a>), Eversource Energy (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ES#NYSE">ES</a>), Hologic Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HOLX#NASDAQ">HOLX</a>), Mohawk Industries Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MHK#NYSE">MHK</a>), Camden Property Trust (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CPT#NYSE">CPT</a>) and Live Nation Entertainment Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LYV#NYSE">LYV</a>).
Read Now: 
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/04/45117801/apple-q2-earnings-preview-analysts-remain-bullish-with-caution-of-tariff-tornado-hitting-iphone">Apple Q2 Earnings Preview: Analysts Remain Bullish But Warn Of &#8216;Tariff Tornado&#8217; Hitting iPhone</a></li>
</ul>
Photo: Shutterstock

Earnings

Macro Economic Events

Broad U.S. Equity ETFs

Econ #s

Tech

$BTC

AAPL

ABNB

AMGN

AMZN

CARR

SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust

DXCM

EQIX

GDDY

HOLX

KLAC

MPWR

MSFT

MSTR

QCOM

TEAM

Wall Street Eyes 8th Positive Day As S&P 500 Recoups Tariff-Led Losses, Bitcoin Rallies To $97,000: What's Driving Markets Thursday? (CORRECTED)

Looking into the current session, Allstate Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALL#NYSE">ALL</a>) shares are trading at $195.61, after a 1.40% drop. Over the past month, the stock fell by 5.72%, but over the past year, it actually went up by 15.10%. With questionable short-term performance like this, and great long-term performance, long-term shareholders might want to start looking into the company's price-to-earnings ratio. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1746111619_0.png" alt="Past Year Chart" />

<h3>How Does Allstate P/E Compare to Other Companies?</h3>
The P/E ratio measures the current share price to the company's EPS. It is used by long-term investors to analyze the company's current performance against it's past earnings, historical data and aggregate market data for the industry or the indices, such as S&amp;P 500. A higher P/E indicates that investors expect the company to perform better in the future, and the stock is probably overvalued, but not necessarily. It also could indicate that investors are willing to pay a higher share price currently, because they expect the company to perform better in the upcoming quarters. This leads investors to also remain optimistic about rising dividends in the future. 
Compared to the aggregate P/E ratio of the 17.48 in the Insurance industry, Allstate Inc. has a lower P/E ratio of 11.68. Shareholders might be inclined to think that the stock might perform worse than it's industry peers. It's also possible that the stock is undervalued. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1746111619_1.png" alt="Guage" />

In conclusion, the price-to-earnings ratio is a useful metric for analyzing a company's market performance, but it has its limitations. While a lower P/E can indicate that a company is undervalued, it can also suggest that shareholders do not expect future growth. Additionally, the P/E ratio should not be used in isolation, as other factors such as industry trends and business cycles can also impact a company's stock price. Therefore, investors should use the P/E ratio in conjunction with other financial metrics and qualitative analysis to make informed investment decisions.

Comments

Allstate

Vendite allo scoperto

Allstate (NYSE:ALL) Azioni, Report sulle vendite allo scoperto

Notizie

PARTNER/COLLABORATORE

BENZINGA NEL MONDO