Amprius Technologies (NYSE:AMPX) Azioni

AMPRIUS TECHNOLOGIES INC

Amprius Technologies

Amprius Technologies Inc is engaged in the production of silicon anodes for high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries. The company develops, manufactures and markets lithium-ion batteries for mobility applications, including the aviation, electric vehicle (EV) and light electric vehicle (LEV) industries. The company's batteries are used for existing and emerging aviation applications, including unmanned aerial systems, such as drones and high-altitude pseudo satellites.

Amprius Technologies Inc

Amprius Technologies, Inc. Warrants to purchase one share of Common Stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per share

News

General

NOTE

FiscalNote Holdings  Files For Resale Of Up To 12.5M Shares Of Class A Common Stock By The Selling Stockholders

LTBR

Lightbridge Files For Mixed Shelf Of Up To $150M

Ardent Health Partners, Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ARDT#NYSE">ARDT</a>) ("Ardent Health" or the "Company"), a leading provider of healthcare in growing mid-sized urban communities across the U.S., today announced that its board of directors voted to change the Company's name to Ardent Health, Inc., effective June 3, 2025. The updated name aligns the Company's legal name with its practice of referring to the organization as "Ardent Health" in its communications, ensuring a clear and consistent brand identity.
The name change will have no impact on Ardent Health's trading symbol on the New York Stock Exchange, its CUSIP number, nor the rights of its stockholders. Ardent Health anticipates that its common stock will begin trading under its updated name on June 3, 2025.

ARDT

Ardent Health Partners Changes Name To Ardent Health Inc., Effective June 3, 2025

CAPT

Captivision Receives Nasdaq Notice Regarding Delayed Annual Report On Form 20-F

VIOT

Viomi Technology Receives NASDAQ Letter Regarding Late Filing of Form 20-F

Our money habits operate in the background, but they influence our long-term wealth. While adopting good money habits like saving and investing can be beneficial, there are also a bunch of bad money habits that you should avoid.
Financial guru Vincent Chan recently laid out <a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@vincentchanco/video/7505012156946074912?lang=en">five bad money habits</a> that keep people poor. These habits result in fewer people saving money and not having enough when they approach retirement. Chan outlines the dire nature of the situation while presenting some solutions.
Don't Miss:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Hasbro, MGM, and Skechers trust this AI marketing firm — <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/rad-intel">Invest before it's too late.</a></li>
<li>Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart &amp; Target – <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/mode-mobile-2">Many are rushing to grab 4,000 of its pre-IPO shares for just $0.30/share!</a></li>
</ul>
"The average savings rate in the U.S. is 4.6%," Chan explains.
Make sure you are avoiding these red flags as you work toward your long-term financial goals.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Most People Spend First And Save What's Left Over</h2>
Chan starts the list by describing how most people manage their money. People are usually inclined to spend money and then view saving as an afterthought. This mentality can lead to dangerous credit card debt and shrink your nest egg.&nbsp;
Chan recommends that you approach your finances with the 80/20 rule. You should save at least 20% of your money and spend the remaining 80% on necessities and discretionary items. However, you can gradually boost your savings rate above 20% if you find yourself in a position to do so.
Reaching 80/20 will require that you cut back on some expenses. You may have to abandon unused subscriptions and take a closer look at how you spend money. Avoiding impulsive spending and establishing a budget can help you stick with the 80/20 rule.
Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/boxabl-scaling-fast-from-spacex-orders-to-600-homes-built-this-60k-foldable-home-may-be-the-future-of-housing">this is your last chance to become an investor for $0.80 per share.</a>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Not Investing Early Enough</h2>
Warren Buffett made 99% of his wealth after his 50th birthday. Chan brings up this detail while encouraging people to invest early and often.
Compound growth can work wonders and move you closer to your goals than earning a salary and stashing your money in a checking account. While bank accounts have their value, it's important to regularly invest your money into assets like ETFs and mutual funds. Real estate is another viable option, but it can take some time before you have enough capital to invest.&nbsp;
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Letting Credit Card Debt Build</h2>
Compound growth doesn't only work for investments. It also applies to credit card debt, but if you let your lingering balance compound for too long, it can put you in a tough financial position.
To remedy this, Chan recommends only using your credit card for purchases if you have enough cash to cover them. You shouldn't carry a balance at the end of each month. Instead, you should pay it in full.&nbsp;
If you are not in a position to pay off your balance each month, make sure it's getting smaller at the end of each month. Don't let credit card debt grow even more than it already has. If you let it grow too much, it can become unmanageable and lead to bankruptcy.
See Also: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/wideradvisor-retirement-planning">Schedule your free call with a financial advisor to start your financial journey – no cost, no obligation</a>.&nbsp;
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Not Tracking Your Money</h2>
Review your monthly credit card statements and keep a spreadsheet that details your monthly income and expenses. Chan says that it's a big mistake not to know where your money is going.
By monitoring your finances, you can discover new opportunities to save money. Once you set up the systems, it's very easy to stay on top of where your money goes.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Not Saving Enough Money</h2>
Most people don't save enough money in the U.S., especially with the average savings rate hovering at 4.6%. You can cut expenses to boost your savings right away, but you will eventually have to prioritize income growth.&nbsp;
Someone who is only saving 4.6% might be able to get to a 5% to 7% savings rate with a few changes to their budget. However, you will only get to a more desirable savings rate that is above 20% if you increase your earnings. You can grow your income by asking for a raise, job hopping, working more hours, or picking up a side hustle.
Read Next:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Nancy Pelosi Invested $5 Million In An AI Company Last Year — <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/elf-labs-ym?v=123">Here's How You Can Invest In Multiple Pre-IPO AI Startups With Just $1,000.</a></li>
<li>‘Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/mode-mobile-2">You can invest today for just $0.30/share with a $1000 minimum.</a></li>
</ul>
Image: Shutterstock

Personal Finance

Vincent Chan Reveals The Five Money Habits That Keep People Poor: 'The Average Savings Rate In The U.S. Is 4.6%'

Lennox Intl (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LII#NYSE">LII</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 15 years by 6.7% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 18.58%. Currently, Lennox Intl has a market capitalization of $20.13 billion. 
Buying $100 In LII: If an investor had bought $100 of LII stock 15 years ago, it would be worth $1,267.40 today based on a price of $567.16 for LII at the time of writing.
<h3>Lennox Intl's Performance Over Last 15 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1748032213_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Trading Ideas

If You Invested $100 In This Stock 15 Years Ago, You Would Have This Much Today

PRTA

Trading Halt: Halt status updated at 4:30:00 PM ET: Quotation Resumption: News and Resumption Times

TNDM

Tandem Diabetes Care Enters Settlement Agreement With Roche Entities; Settlement Resolves Disputes Related To T:Slim X2 Pump Patents; To Pay Roche $36M Over Five Years

<h3>GAINERS:</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/ITHUF">iAnthus Capital Hldgs</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ITHUF#OTC">ITHUF</a>) shares closed up 25.00% at $0.01</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/LBUY">Leafbuyer Techs</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LBUY#OTC">LBUY</a>) shares closed up 21.62% at $0.03</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/RSSFF">Affinor Growers</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RSSFF#OTC">RSSFF</a>) shares closed up 17.11% at $0.04</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CNTMF">FLUENT</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CNTMF#OTC">CNTMF</a>) shares closed up 8.75% at $0.05</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/RMHB">Rocky Mountain High</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RMHB#OTC">RMHB</a>) shares closed up 6.06% at $0.00</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CURR">Currenc Group</a> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CURR#NASDAQ">CURR</a>) shares closed up 5.35% at $0.50</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/VFF">Village Farms Intl</a> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VFF#NASDAQ">VFF</a>) shares closed up 4.13% at $1.24</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/NWVCF">EnWave</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NWVCF#OTC">NWVCF</a>) shares closed up 3.69% at $0.25</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CXXIF">C21 Investments</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CXXIF#OTC">CXXIF</a>) shares closed up 3.45% at $0.15</li>
</ul>
<h3>LOSERS:</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/FFNTF">4Front Ventures</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FFNTF#OTC">FFNTF</a>) shares closed down 65.00% at $0.0007</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/FUAPF">Global Compliance</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FUAPF#OTC">FUAPF</a>) shares closed down 42.86% at $0.00</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/XXII">22nd Century Group</a> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/XXII#NASDAQ">XXII</a>) shares closed down 9.14% at $0.88</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CRBP">Corbus Pharmaceuticals</a> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CRBP#NASDAQ">CRBP</a>) shares closed down 6.76% at $7.40</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/SOLCF">SOL Global Investments</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SOLCF#OTC">SOLCF</a>) shares closed down 6.62% at $0.07</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CBDY">Target Group</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CBDY#OTC">CBDY</a>) shares closed down 6.28% at $0.00</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CGC">Canopy Gwth</a> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CGC#NASDAQ">CGC</a>) shares closed down 5.70% at $1.83</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CVSI">CV Sciences</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CVSI#OTC">CVSI</a>) shares closed down 4.94% at $0.03</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CBWTF">Auxly Cannabis Group</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CBWTF#OTC">CBWTF</a>) shares closed down 4.22% at $0.06</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/MRMD">MariMed</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MRMD#OTC">MRMD</a>) shares closed down 4.15% at $0.07</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CRLBF">Cresco Labs</a> (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CRLBF#OTC">CRLBF</a>) shares closed down 3.24% at $0.66</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/GNLN">Greenlane Hldgs</a> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GNLN#NASDAQ">GNLN</a>) shares closed down 3.23% at $0.01</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/SOL">Emeren Group</a> (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SOL#NYSE">SOL</a>) shares closed down 3.21% at $1.55</li>
</ul>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Cannabis

Markets

Movers

CBDY

CANNABIS WHEATON INCOME by Cannabis Wheaton Income Corp.

CBWTF

CNTMF

CRBP

CRLBF

CURE PHARMA HLDG CORP by CURE Pharmaceutical Holding Corp.

CURR

CVSI

CXXIF

FFNTF

FUAPF

GNLN

ITHUF

LEAFBUYER TECHNOLOGIES by Leafbuyer Technologies, Inc.

LBUY

MRMD

NWVCF

RMHB

RSSFF

SOLCF

XXII

Marijuana Stock Movers For May 23, 2025

Just as Wall Street seemed as though a sense of stability was finally seeping into 2025, President Trump served a timely reminder that tariff uncertainty will continue to drive market volatility. 
The President announced that he would be "recommending" sweeping 50% tariffs on all European Union imports, due to start on June 1, as a result of a perceived lack of progress in trade negotiations with the bloc. 
Trump elaborated that factors like the EU's trade barriers, VAT taxes, corporate penalties, non-monetary trade barriers, and lawsuits against US firms had contributed to an annual trade deficit exceeding $250 billion, which was labeled "totally unacceptable."
European benchmarks <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/economics/macro-economic-events/25/05/45585283/trump-tariff-threat-hits-europe-stocks-sink-as-50-duties-loom">bore the brunt</a> of the President's tariff threat, with the Euro STOXX 50 index tumbling 3% while Italy's FTSE MIB was the worst-affected national index, falling 2.9%.
However, all eyes are now on the S&amp;P 500 and how US markets will respond, just a matter of weeks after the US and China's escalating trade war briefly sank the index before a climbdown restored a measure of investor confidence.&nbsp;
The shock of the announcement triggered a 1.62% decline in the index while investors struggled with the severity of the President's threats.&nbsp;
Worryingly for the tech-heavy S&amp;P 500, Trump also took aim at Apple by suggesting that iPhones should be manufactured in the United States or else the product will be subject to a 25% tariff.&nbsp;
At a time when markets have been recovering following the announcement of a 90-day delay to the United States' reciprocal tariffs announced in April, as well as a subsequent delay to the escalated tariffs on Chinese imports, Trump's hard stance on the European Union and tech imports serves as a timely reminder that Wall Street needs to become accustomed to tariff uncertainty in 2025.&nbsp;
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">An Index in Flux</h2>
Forecasts for the S&amp;P 500 have changed dramatically throughout different stages of the year. Despite trading more than 15% lower between January 1 and April 8, 2025, the index briefly turned positive for the year in mid-May before losing momentum once again.&nbsp;
Just hours before Trump's announcements, Capital Economics raised its forecast for the S&amp;P 500 to 7,000 by the end of 2026, citing the easing of trade tensions and improved market conditions as a core reason for the upturn in confidence. 
This positive sentiment was echoed by Sonu Varghese, a global macro strategist with Carson Wealth, <a href="https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/articles/2025/5/sp-500-valuations-stumble-on-tariff-uncertainty-89099352">who suggested</a> that there was ‘too much uncertainty,' but that the Trump administration's recent pullbacks from their initial tariff salvo were a cause for cautious optimism.&nbsp;
This turnaround in sentiment has been astonishing when looking back at April's tariff-related downturn. In the midst of Trump's tariff uncertainty, the Economy Forecast Agency updated its expectations for the S&amp;P 500 to an annual close of 4,379. Looking further ahead to the end of 2026, expectations appeared a little rosier at 5,708. 
These major expectation shifts from economists show that Wall Street is struggling to keep up with the unpredictability of the Trump administration and that the S&amp;P 500 is likely to be more vulnerable to unexpected investor sentiment changes based on the President's use of social media to share frequent policy updates.&nbsp;
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Disrupting the Magnificent Seven</h2>
It would be a challenge to assess which of Trump's announcements &#8211; on EU tariffs and levies on Apple product imports &#8211; has the most significant ramifications for the S&amp;P 500. 
The Magnificent Seven, a collective of large-cap tech stocks consisting of Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Google parent Alphabet, Nvidia, Meta, and Tesla, accounts for more than one-third of the total market capitalization of the S&amp;P 500. This means that tariff disruption affecting these stocks can severely impact the performance of the index as a whole. 
Upon claiming that Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) would be subject to a <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgr5xrygzk5o">25% import tariff</a> if iPhones continue to be manufactured outside of the United States, the tech giant's stock slipped 3.72% at the beginning of trading on Friday, 23 May.&nbsp;
Apple had been resorting to airlifting as much as 600 tons of iPhones from India as a means of bypassing tariffs. However, Trump's ambitions for American firms are to shift manufacturing to the United States, helping to boost industry.&nbsp;
Should the President adopt a similar stance to US tech leaders and large-cap firms, we could see severe disruption throughout many key market players and their supply chains.&nbsp;
Given that manufacturing in China, for instance, is significantly lower in cost compared to the United States due to factors like cheaper labour, smaller energy costs, and stronger logistics, the shift to US-based manufacturing could be a significant disruptive force should domestic infrastructure struggle to keep up.&nbsp;
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Adapting to Uncertainty</h2>
2025 is fast becoming a year of extreme market uncertainty due to the unpredictability of tariffs and the willingness of the President to share prospective policy shifts on social media.&nbsp;
For investors, it's essential to keep a level head when dealing with volatility in the S&amp;P 500 and to avoid taking rash decisions by withdrawing investments or buying into speculative stocks on a whim.&nbsp;
We're likely to learn a lot about Trump's stance on tariffs as the initial 90-day tariff delay to April's reciprocal tariffs ends on July 8. Until then, adopting a more cautious strategy could be the most measured strategy on Wall Street.
Disclosure:&nbsp;On the date of publication, Dmytro Spilka did not hold (either directly or indirectly) any positions in the securities mentioned in this article. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer. Dmytro Spilka does not intend to make a trade in any of the securities mentioned above in the next 72 hours.

Equities

Government

Regulations

Broad U.S. Equity ETFs

Opinion

AAPL

Trump's Trade Spat With Europe And Apple Revives Tariff Risks For S&P 500

While municipal bond inflows swell and tax season tastes like bitter almonds, Vanguard is dishing up new relief for income-hungry investors, once more with two <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/etfs">brand-new low-cost ETFs</a> designed for long-term strategy and local benefit.
The company launched today the Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (BATS:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VTEL#BATS">VTEL</a>) and the Vanguard New York Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (BATS:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MUNY#BATS">MUNY</a>), bringing its muni ETF lineup to six and its entire municipal lineup (which includes six index ETFs, two active ETFs, 12 active mutual funds, one index mutual fund, and three money market funds) to 24.
Also Read: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/05/45594832/not-all-bitcoin-etfs-are-created-equal-heres-how-structure-shapes-risk-returns-and-taxes">Not All Bitcoin ETFs Are Created Equal: Here&#8217;s How Structure Shapes Risk, Returns, And Taxes</a>
VTEL provides investors with exposure to longer-term municipal bonds, a good wager for those expecting rate reductions or wanting to fix returns. MUNY targets debt issued by New York, providing a concentrated defense for residents who want to limit both state and federal tax nibbles.
Both ETFs have a low cost of 0.09%, in line with Vanguard&#8217;s promise of quality without the cost. Both funds are passively managed, providing investors with a no-frills, index-based strategy in an otherwise complicated corner of the bond market.
The timing isn't coincidental. Investors have poured into municipal bond ETFs this year, with the flagship Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VTEB#NYSE">VTEB</a>) alone pulling in $3.48 billion in net flows over the past year, according to FactSet data as of May 20. That surge underscores growing demand for tax-aware, duration-managed products amid uncertainty around rates and inflation.
Also Read: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/etfs/new-etfs/25/05/45577673/strategy-shares-rolls-the-dice-with-monopoly-etf-for-market-giants">Strategy Shares Rolls The Dice With Monopoly ETF For Market Giants</a>
Vanguard&#8217;s newest additions complete a strategy that more and more serves the &#8220;do-it-yourself allocator.&#8221; With national muni exposure through VTEB and Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VTES#NYSE">VTES</a>), state-specific accessibility through Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (BATS:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VTEC#BATS">VTEC</a>) and now MUNY (New York), and longer-duration flexibility through VTEL, advisors and individuals can now construct more thoughtful municipal ladders without leaving the Vanguard world.
For a company more famous for steady fingers than glitzy headlines, Vanguard&#8217;s muni ETF movements might appear subtle, but in a yield-starved environment replete with tax pitfalls, that&#8217;s precisely the sort of low-key plan investors are on the hunt for.
Read Next: 
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/etfs/sector-etfs/25/05/45593231/trump-sparks-uranium-frenzy-nuclear-etfs-see-explosive-gains">Trump Sparks Uranium Frenzy: Nuclear ETFs See Explosive Gains</a></li>
</ul>
Photo: Zakharchuk via Shutterstock

Bonds

New ETFs

ETFs

Vanguard New York Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Vanguard New York Tax-Exempt Bond ETF

MUNY

VTEB

VTEC

Vanguard Tax-Managed Funds Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF

VTEL

Vanguard Wellington Fund Vanguard Short-Term Tax Exempt Bond ETF

VTES

Vanguard Doubles Down On Munis With Two New ETFs — Just In Time For Tax-Weary Investors

Middlesex Water Company (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSEX#NASDAQ">MSEX</a>), a provider of life-sustaining water and wastewater utility services, announced that its Board of Directors has named Nadine Leslie as Chair of the Board. Leslie, who currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer, succeeds Dennis W. Doll, who retired from the Board following a 20-year tenure with the company.
The Board also named Amy Mansue to serve as its Lead Independent Director, a role established to further support the Board's independence and strengthen governance oversight.

Management

MSEX

Middlesex Water Company Names President And CEO Nadine Leslie As Chair Of The Board, Succeeding Dennis W. Doll

Jayud Global Logistics Receives Nasdaq Letter Regarding Minimum Bid Price Deficiency

Plus Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PSTV#NASDAQ">PSTV</a>) (the "Company") today announced it received a delinquency notification letter from Nasdaq on May 21, 2025, which indicated that the Company was not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) as a result of the delayed filing of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2025 (the "Quarterly Report"). The Nasdaq Listing Rule requires listed companies to timely file all required periodic financial reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). This notification has no immediate effect on the listing of the Company's securities on Nasdaq.
Nasdaq has informed the Company that it must submit a plan to regain compliance with respect to the filing requirement by July 21, 2025. If the plan is accepted, Nasdaq can grant an exception of up to 180 calendar dates from the due date of the filing, or until November 17, 2025, to regain compliance.
The Company is working diligently to file the Quarterly Report as promptly as practical, and expects to return to a normal filing cadence for the remainder of 2025.

PSTV

Plus Therapeutics Receives Nasdaq Delinquency Notice Over Late Form 10-Q Submission

Transaction Expected to Close in Q3 2025
SatixFy Communications Ltd. ("SatixFy" or the "Company") (NYSE:<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SATX#NYSE">SATX</a>), today announced that at a special meeting of shareholders (the "Meeting") on May 23, 2025, holders of the majority of outstanding ordinary shares of SatixFy voted to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with MDA Space Ltd. ("MDA Space"), as amended and announced on May 20, 2025, pursuant to which MDA Space agreed to acquire SatixFy in an all-cash transaction (the "Merger").
Over 99% of the Company's outstanding ordinary shares that were voted at the Meeting in person or by proxy were voted in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and the Merger.

SatixFy Communications Ltd. Ordinary Share

SATX

SatixFy Shareholders Approve Proposed Acquisition By MDA Space; Transaction Expected To Close In Q3 2025

PLRZ

Polyrizon Receives Nasdaq Delisting Notice

Oracle (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ORCL#NYSE">ORCL</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 10.07% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 24.2%. Currently, Oracle has a market capitalization of $437.38 billion. 
Buying $100 In ORCL: If an investor had bought $100 of ORCL stock 5 years ago, it would be worth $295.51 today based on a price of $155.97 for ORCL at the time of writing.
<h3>Oracle's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1748031345_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

ORCL

Here's How Much $100 Invested In Oracle 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

Everybody "knows" that value investing doesn't work anymore. It's in all the headlines.
Investing today is about technology, everyone says. It's about artificial intelligence. It's about quantum computing, about the rebirth of nuclear energy.
Some of this is true, some isn't, but what's really not true is that value investing doesn't work. In fact, it still works better than just about any other investing approach.
The reason people say otherwise is because they've got value all wrong. "Value," they think, is just another word for "cheap." But most cheap stocks are cheap because they're bad investments.
Here's how to invest in value the right way using just two metrics – and beat the markets handily.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What People Get Wrong About Value</h2>
There are a couple of problems with the way people define value investing. First, we need to address the fact that the sound of it is boring.  Value investing sounds like a professor with tweed elbow patches smoking a pipe in an old dusty office in some brick and ivy university somewhere up in Vermont or Maine during a snowstorm. It just sounds boring.
Perhaps if we could call it vulture investing, market pillaging, or some other equally interesting name, it would attract more attention.
But then again, since we seem to have a corner on it, do we really want to attract all that much attention?
Second, let's talk about the way people track value. For instance, the Russell Value Index is supposed to represent value. When you compare it, growth has outperformed value for several hundred consecutive years, according to the literature.
That may be a slight exaggeration, but you get the point.
When you examine the Russell 1000 Value index, it's allegedly the bottom half of the Russell 2000 weighted by value components.
The top holdings include Berkshire Hathaway, Cisco Systems, McDonald&#8217;s, Walt Disney, Raytheon, and Caterpillar. These are all great companies.
What they are not is value companies.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Truth About Value</h2>
When we really look at the hard data, the truth is that absolute value never stopped working. When you look at companies that are trading at discounts to asset value, low multiples of the cash produced by the business, and low multiples of liquidation value, which is still one of my favorites, the truth is that they have continued to work and work very well.
The key thing that most people leave out is they will run a list of companies trading below book value and will say, &#8220;Look, these underperformed the market.&#8221; That is, in fact, true.
More than half of those companies are unprofitable and overleveraged, and their products are going completely out of style. You know, they are CD-ROM manufacturers or buggy whip makers in the business of making something we are never going to use again.
Many of the companies that trade below book value, in all honesty, do so for a reason. They are headed for the garbage pile.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Making Value Work: Financial Strength</h2>
How do we get rid of those? You have to adjust for a couple of factors:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>You want strength in the financial statements.</li>
<li>You want the ability to survive, and you prefer that they are profitable.</li>
</ul>
Two papers, with several follow-ups, have come out in the last twenty-five years that show us how to do this.
One of these is Joseph Piotrowski&#8217;s publication &#8220;Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers.&#8221; The F-score is based on that paper.
Value plus the F-score crush the market. When we add value plus the F-score plus credit scores, I prefer the Altman Z score—then you annihilate the market.
The key variable here is profitability and financial strength.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Missing Factor: Profitability</h2>
The other paper, which very few people seem to have read, is important.
In 2013, an economist, Robert Novy-Marks, published a paper that should have but didn&#8217;t redefine the entire playing field for investing. It is called &#8220;The Other Side of Value: The Gross Profitability Premium.&#8221;
Basically, they found that highly profitable companies outperform, no matter how cheap or expensive they may look. It is a single idea that gross profitability is the missing dimension, the missing factor.
It has found its way into some of the academic models. Novy-Marksed followed up on it with &#8220;Profitability Retrospective: What Have We Learned?&#8221;
This is key because many people today will tell you that quality matters. We have got to buy these quality companies. Everyone has a 16, 17, or 18-factor model that supposedly helps us identify truly high-quality companies.
Novy-Marks has found in both the original 2013 study and the retrospective today that you only need one factor to identify quality. That factor is profitability, which is defined in the original paper as gross profits as a percentage of assets.
The higher that is, the better the company is.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Quality Simplified</h2>
It explains all of the excess returns from so-called quality investing. When you ask what exactly we are looking for here, it turns out it all boils down to one simple measure.
You can use an 18-factor model, or you can use just gross profitability as a percent of assets. When you look at the largest cap companies that are in the upper end of the range: Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>), Amazon (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>), Alphabet (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOGL#NASDAQ">GOOGL</a>), Meta (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>), Walmart (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WMT#NYSE">WMT</a>), Visa (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/V#NYSE">V</a>), Eli Lilly (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LLY#NYSE">LLY</a>), MasterCard (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MA#NYSE">MA</a>), Oracle (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ORCL#NYSE">ORCL</a>), Johnson &amp; Johnson (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/JNJ#NYSE">JNJ</a>), Procter &amp; Gamble (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PG#NYSE">PG</a>), UnitedHealth (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/UNH#NYSE">UNH</a>), T-Mobile (NASDAQ: TMUS) &#8211; all of the same companies that would show up if we use that super sophisticated, 18-factor quality model for which you will pay a massive premium to have access to the data – it turns out you can get the same list using just gross profitability.
Gross profitability also explains all of the defensive strategies.
All of the defensive low beta stocks are just highly profitable companies that also are growing their asset base slowly. They are doing very conservative investing. They are not de-worsifying the business. They are not trying to grow at a high rate.
They are just ridiculously profitable companies that are willing to sit in place and do what they are good at and continually pile up profits and cash.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Unifying Factor</h2>
Profitability explains quality. It explains the low beta and low volatility phenomena.
Many investors have looked for new ways to define value. Cash flow to price, earnings forecast, intangible adjusted tangible book value, adjust for a lot of different factors in R&amp;D. These are going to "fix" value's alleged shortcomings in a day and age of high technology.
The truth is that all these newer value strategies sneak in profitability as a factor in addition to value. Profitability by itself delivers market-beating returns.
Profitability plus value, whether that is price to book or a different model that works, like enterprise value to earnings before interest and taxes, beats the market even more.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why Value Appears to Have Underperformed</h2>
When we look at the underperformance of "value" since 2007, the truth is that it's because we junked up the value universe. We put a lot of garbage in there. There are many stocks trading below book value that are biotech startup companies. They are below the cash balance on the balance sheet, but they are burning cash at a rapid rate and will soon be out of money. The book value will, in fact, disappear.
There are all these companies that look cheap but are wildly unprofitable. They are burning through money.
Then you have a lot of garbage that came in through the two SPAC movements in 2007 and then again in 2020 when companies that were still basically at the garage stage of existence suddenly went public.
We really junked up the value universe with a lot of garbage.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Foundation of Investment Success</h2>
Profitability is not just another factor but another tool.
It is a foundational tool that unifies multiple styles. It is part of quality, defensive value, and even some growth stocks.
Profitability explains a lot of the strategies that people use without relying on complicated, expensive 18-factor models.
If we take low-volatility companies and buy the most profitable, we are going to outperform the market.
If we just buy the most profitable companies, we are going to outperform the market.
If we buy the most profitable companies that are trading at low multiples of the cash produced by the business, we are going to absolutely crush the markets.
This is not a day trading system or a short-term trading system. It is the single best way to build long-term portfolios that beat the market and produce lasting wealth.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Unified Theory of Investing</h2>
Profitability explains almost everything that happens in the market. If you have a great business, it is wildly profitable.
If you are a quality company with high returns on equity, low leverage, and earning stability, you are a very profitable company.
If you are a defensive company with low volatility and lower beta, all of the outperformance of these strategies is because they are profitable companies that are not reinvesting in the business to rapidly grow the asset base.
You have low-investment, profitable companies. There is your entire defensive strategy.
The underperformance of value investing over the last fifteen years or so is entirely because of the addition of so many unprofitable companies. If we use F-scores and profitability to screen out just the profitable undervalued companies, performance goes through the roof.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Simple Path to Success</h2>
Most people won't do it because it doesn't make you rich by next Tuesday. It is not the absolute most exciting strategy on the planet. What it does is give you a very easy, quick way to uncover opportunities.
Two scores.
That is all you have to check. You can put together a universe of companies that can crush the market.
Basically, no folks, value investing is not dead.
If anything, if you understand that financial strength and profitability are the key to making value investing go from boring to the most exciting thing you can possibly do with your money, value investing is very much alive and still very successful.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Want to Trade the Next Reversal? Start Here</h2>
Matt Maley is watching one ultra-liquid ETF that surges when the market pulls back. He's used it time and time again—and this Wednesday at 6 PM ET, he'll be live to show you how to time it with precision. It's perfect for short-term traders looking to get ahead of the next move. Register <a href="https://events2.benzinga.com/matt-maley-webinar-wed-may28-2025-registration/?utm_campaign=webinar052825&amp;utm_adType=sponsorad&amp;utm_ad=RD052725">HERE</a> for this free masterclass now.
Editorial content from our expert contributors is intended to be information for the general public and not individualized investment advice. Editors/contributors are presenting their individual opinions and strategies, which are neither expressly nor impliedly approved or endorsed by Benzinga.
Photo: Shutterstock

AMZN

GOOGL

TMUS

Value Investing Is Not Dead - It Just Got Smarter

Pelican Acquisition Corporation (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PELIU#NASDAQ">PELIU</a>) (the "Company"), a Cayman Islands exempted company, announced that it priced its initial public offering of 7,500,000 units at $10.00 per unit on May 22, 2025. The units are listed on the Nasdaq Global Market ("NASDAQ") and trade under the ticker symbol "PELIU" beginning on May 23, 2025. Each unit consists of one ordinary share of the Company and one right, with each right entitling the holder thereof to receive one-tenth (1/10) of one ordinary share upon the consummation of an initial business combination.
Once the securities comprising the units begin separate trading, the ordinary shares and rights are expected to be listed on NASDAQ under the symbols "PELI" and "PELIR", respectively.

IPOs

PELI

PELIU

Pelican Acquisition Prices IPO Of 7.5M Units At $10.00/Unit, Begins Trading On NASDAQ Under "PELIU"

Press Releases

Amprius Ships New High-Performance 6.3Ah Silicon Anode Cylindrical Cell to Fortune 500 Company

Amprius Technologies Announces Date for Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Results and Business Updates

Amprius Technologies Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Business and Financial Results

Amprius Sets April 2025 Events Schedule

Amprius Names Industry Veteran Tom Stepien as President to Lead Commercial Growth and Market Expansion

Amprius Launches SiCore™ 450 Wh/kg High-Energy Cell, with Near-Term Mass Production Capability to Scale

Amprius Technologies Announces Date for First Quarter 2025 Results and Business Updates

Amprius Sets May 2025 Events Schedule

Amprius Technologies Reports First Quarter 2025 Business and Financial Results

AALTO Zephyr Achieves World-Record 67-Day Flight Powered by Amprius Ultra-High-Energy Batteries

Comments

Amprius Technologies

Notizie

PARTNER/COLLABORATORE

BENZINGA NEL MONDO