La vendita allo scoperto per DLocal dà agli investitori un'idea del grado in cui gli investitori stanno scommettendo sul declino delle azioni di DLocal. I dati relativi alle vendite allo scoperto vengono aggiornati ogni due settimane.

DLocal (NASDAQ:DLO) Azioni, Report sulle vendite allo scoperto

DLocal

DLocal Ltd is focused on making the complex simple, redefining the online payment experience in emerging markets. Through its technology platform, One dLocal, the company enables world-wide enterprise merchants to get paid (pay-in) and to make payments (pay-out) online in a safe and efficient manner. The company earns revenue from fees charged to merchants in connection with payment processing services for cross-border and local payment transactions. The company's geographical segments include Latin America and Non-Latin America with a majority of its revenue being generated from Brazil in Latin America region.

U.S. stocks were lower, with the Dow Jones index falling more than 250 points on Friday.
Shares of PriceSmart, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PSMT#NASDAQ">PSMT</a>) rose sharply during Friday's session as the company reported <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/PSMT/earnings">better-than-expected third-quarter financial results.</a>
Pricesmart reported quarterly earnings of $1.14 per share which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $1.13 per share. The company reported quarterly sales of $1.317 billion which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $1.310 billion.
PriceSmart shares jumped 6.5% to $109.41 on Friday.
Here are some other big stocks recording gains in today&#8217;s session.
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Zepp Health Corporation (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ZEPP#NYSE">ZEPP</a>) shares jumped 44.6% to $8.81.</li>
<li>Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NEGG#NASDAQ">NEGG</a>) gained 31% to $37.64.</li>
<li>Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RCAT#NASDAQ">RCAT</a>) rose 18.5% to $8.04. Shares of drone stocks traded higher after Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced efforts to fast-track drone production.</li>
<li>AIRO Group Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AIRO#NASDAQ">AIRO</a>) gained 17.7% to $26.11.</li>
<li>Ruanyun Edai Technology Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RYET#NASDAQ">RYET</a>) jumped 15% to $17.70. Ruanyun Edai Technology signed a strategic partnership with Confucius Institute at Prince Sultan University to scale HanLink across Saudi Arabia.</li>
<li>Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RCAT#NASDAQ">RCAT</a>) gained 15% to $7.81. Shares of drone stocks traded higher after Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced efforts to fast-track drone production.</li>
<li>Kratos Defense &amp; Security Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KTOS#NASDAQ">KTOS</a>) surged 12.2% to $51.90. Shares of drone stocks traded higher after Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced efforts to fast-track drone production.</li>
<li>Levi Strauss &amp; Co. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LEVI#NYSE">LEVI</a>) rose 10.6% to $21.83 after the company reported better-than-expected second-quarter financial results and raised its FY25 adjusted EPS guidance.</li>
<li>AeroVironment, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AVAV#NASDAQ">AVAV</a>) gained 8.4% to $257.60. Shares of drone stocks traded higher after Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced efforts to fast-track drone production.</li>
</ul>
Now Read This:<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-stock-ratings/price-target/25/07/46361010/johnson-here-are-the-recent-forecast-changes-from-wall-streets-most-accurate-analysts-2"> </a>
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-stock-ratings/price-target/25/07/46361010/johnson-here-are-the-recent-forecast-changes-from-wall-streets-most-accurate-analysts-2">Johnson &amp; Johnson Gears Up For Q2 Print; Here Are The Recent Forecast Changes From Wall Street&#8217;s Most Accurate Analysts</a></li>
</ul>
Photo via Shutterstock

News

Intraday Update

Markets

Movers

Trading Ideas

AIRO

AVAV

KTOS

LEVI

NEGG

PSMT

RCAT

RYET

ZEPP

PriceSmart Posts Better-Than-Expected Earnings, Joins Red Cat Holdings, Red Cat Holdings, AeroVironment And Other Big Stocks Moving Higher On Friday

Macro Economic Events

Politics

Global

Economics

General

Reuters Cites Brazil's Lula Saying Trump Is Misinformed, U.S. Does Not Run A Trade Deficit With Brazil

In an evolving landscape where efficiency and talent optimization are becoming paramount, Netflix Inc&#8216;s (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NFLX#NASDAQ">NFLX</a>)  remarkable revenue per employee sets it apart and shifts the market&#8217;s focus to the untapped potential of human capital. This challenges traditional metrics of company valuation, prompting investors to reassess the importance of workforce quality <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/labor-market">in driving future growth.</a>
Netflix had the highest revenue per full-time equivalent (FTE) among the nine big-cap companies in coverage, according to Needham.
The Netflix Analyst: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-stock-ratings/analyst/580607ae846faa000106ab43/laura-martin">Analyst Laura Martin</a> maintained a Buy rating, while raising the price target from $1,126 to $1,500.
The Netflix Thesis: The quality of a company's employee base "is a key asset and upside value driver," Martin said in the note.
Check out <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-stock-ratings">other analyst stock ratings</a>.
Netflix recorded FTE of $2.78 billion in fiscal 2024, meaningfully higher than Apple Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>), Meta Platforms Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) and Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOGL#NASDAQ">GOOGL</a>), the analyst stated.
"In total, NFLX reported nearly 2x higher average rev/FTE compared with the 9 big cap companies we cover," she further wrote.
The revenue and earnings estimates for fiscal 2026 have been raised from $49.07 billion to $49.89 billion and from $29.61 per share to $31.03 per share, respectively, Martin said.
NFLX Price Action:&nbsp;Netflix shares were down 0.29% at $1247.03 at the time of publication Friday,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">according to Benzinga Pro</a>.
Read More: 
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/movers/25/07/46357194/netflix-stock-dips-ahead-of-q2-earnings-despite-analyst-optimism">Netflix Stock Dips Ahead Of Q2 Earnings Despite Analyst Optimism</a></li>
</ul>
Photo: Shutterstock

Analyst Color

Price Target

Reiteration

Analyst Ratings

AAPL

GOOGL

NFLX

Here's What Netflix Does Better Than Apple, Meta And Google

A Reddit post in the <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/DaveRamsey/comments/1lst72m/when_you_say_im_paying_cash_and_the_dealer_looks/">r/DaveRamsey</a> community is getting attention after a car buyer described how bizarre it felt to show up at a dealership with actual money. &#8220;Nothing says ‘alien lifeform' like showing up with actual money at a dealership,&#8221; the post read. &#8220;The dealer looks at you like you just spoke fluent dolphin.&#8221;
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Buyers Say Cash Creates Confusion, Not Perks</h2>
Many echoed the original poster's frustration, saying that walking in with cash doesn't get you VIP treatment—it makes you a problem. One person wrote, &#8220;Dealerships shouldn't exist, period,&#8221; and suggested all car sales should be <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/large-cap/24/12/42427200/amazon-autos-buy-your-next-car-online-its-just-a-click-away">done online</a> at set prices.
Don't Miss:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die."<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/warren-buffet-make-money-when-you-sleep"> Here&#8217;s how you can earn passive income with just $10.</a></li>
<li>$100k+ in investable assets? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/wiseradvisor-retirement-planning">Match with a fiduciary advisor for free to learn how you can maximize your retirement and save on taxes</a> – no cost, no obligation.</li>
</ul>
Several Redditors claimed dealers actually raised prices when they mentioned they were paying in cash. Others said the only way to get a good deal was to pretend to finance, agree on a price, and then pay in full. In other words, never admit you're paying cash until it's time to sign.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Financing: A Dealer&#8217;s Real Moneymaker</h2>
Multiple commenters, including a former finance manager, explained why cash buyers are seen as a threat. &#8220;Dealers don't just prefer financing, they profit from it,&#8221; one wrote. &#8220;Finance = dealer payday. Cash = &#8216;thanks for the floorplan payoff, now get out.'&#8221;
Upsells like extended warranties, maintenance plans, and interest rate markups are easier to sneak in when buyers focus on monthly payments. &#8220;It's way easier to convince someone to buy a $2,000 warranty when you say, &#8216;It's only $14 a month,'&#8221; another person noted.
Trending: BlackRock is calling 2025 the year of alternative assets. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/masterworks">One firm from NYC has quietly built a group of 60,000+ investors who have all joined in on an alt asset class previously exclusive to billionaires like Bezos and Gates.</a>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Many Play The System To Win</h2>
Dozens of users shared a common workaround: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/personal-finance/management/25/07/46264546/a-dave-ramsey-caller-skipped-her-car-payments-to-gamble-and-double-the-money-the-plan-failed-and-now-shes-19000-in-debt-with-no-car">finance the car</a> to get the best price and incentives, then <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/05/45480821/a-redditor-asks-if-they-should-pay-off-half-their-auto-loan-or-invest-the-money-instead-im-genuinely-torn">pay off the loan early</a>. One person explained how they saved over $3,000 just by taking the loan and paying it off in 91 days. &#8220;It cost me $250 in interest,&#8221; they proclaimed.
A few warned to check for <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/what-is-a-prepayment-penalty">early payoff penalties</a> and make sure the dealer still gets their kickback from the lender. &#8220;Most dealers need the loan to stay open for 90 to 120 days to keep their bonus,&#8221; one Redditor wrote. &#8220;Let the 3–4 payments go through, then pay it off if you want. You'll avoid interest for the most part and possibly walk away with a better deal.&#8221;
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Emotional Toll And Frustration</h2>
Many cash buyers said they were treated coldly or even mocked. One recalled a dealer shouting across the lot, &#8220;She&#8217;s paying in cash!&#8221; Another said the dealership wouldn&#8217;t even accept cash and asked them to leave and come back with a certified check.
One user summed up the sentiment: &#8220;They're not dealerships anymore. They're bankerships.&#8221;
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/gbr-savings-by-age">If You're Age 35, 50, or 60: Here&#8217;s How Much You Should Have Saved Vs. Invested By Now</a>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Some Dealers Push Back</h2>
A few self-identified dealership employees joined the thread to offer perspective. One said their location does about 60% of business in cash or check, and they treat both financing and cash buyers equally. But they admitted those practices vary widely.
Others blamed the system, not the salesperson. &#8220;People make it out like this is personal when it's just business,&#8221; a commenter wrote. &#8220;You&#8217;re a number to them.&#8221;
The general consensus is that if you&#8217;re planning to pay cash, play your cards close. Get the best price first, then decide how you want to pay.&nbsp;
Read Next: Over the last five years, the price of gold has increased by approximately 83% — Investors like Bill O&#8217;Reilly and Rudy Giuliani are using this platform to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/american-hartford-gold">create customized gold IRAs to help shield their savings from inflation and economic turbulence.&nbsp;</a>
Image: Shutterstock

Personal Finance

Car Buyer Says Paying Cash Made The Dealer Act Like They 'Just Spoke Fluent Dolphin'—'They're Not Dealerships Anymore. They're Bankerships'

Lam Research (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LRCX#NASDAQ">LRCX</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 9.55% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 23.91%. Currently, Lam Research has a market capitalization of $129.31 billion. 
Buying $1000 In LRCX: If an investor had bought $1000 of LRCX stock 5 years ago, it would be worth $2,998.46 today based on a price of $101.09 for LRCX at the time of writing.
<h3>Lam Research's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1752246921_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

LRCX

Here's How Much $1000 Invested In Lam Research 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

Goldman Sachs analyst Mark Delaney maintains Tesla (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSLA#NASDAQ">TSLA</a>) with a Neutral and lowers the price target from $315 to $285.

TSLA

Goldman Sachs Maintains Neutral on Tesla, Lowers Price Target to $285

Goldman Sachs analyst Mark Delaney upgrades Visteon (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VC#NASDAQ">VC</a>) from Neutral to Buy and raises the price target from $83 to $120.

Upgrades

Goldman Sachs Upgrades Visteon to Buy, Raises Price Target to $120

Goldman Sachs analyst Catherine O'Brien maintains Delta Air Lines (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DAL#NYSE">DAL</a>) with a Buy and raises the price target from $60 to $67.

Goldman Sachs Maintains Buy on Delta Air Lines, Raises Price Target to $67

With over $350 billion already funneled into artificial intelligence infrastructure, Goldman Sachs says the next phase of chip investing hinges on performance, cost-efficiency, and software breadth, setting the stage for new market leaders <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/expert-ideas">and fresh laggards.</a>
Goldman Sachs analyst James Schneider sees the AI investment cycle transitioning from blind spending to early monetization, driving both opportunities and shakeouts across the semiconductor space.
In a new note shared Friday, Goldman rated seven top semiconductor stocks and introduced a &#8220;barbell&#8221; investing strategy: buy two types of companies. First, the performance leaders with strong software ecosystems. Second, the low-cost chipmakers helping companies run AI at scale.
"Although monetization has been elusive, we see early signs of incremental revenue and much clearer evidence of cost takeout to justify these investments," Schneider said.
Four stocks earned a Buy rating: Nvidia Corp. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>), Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AVGO#NASDAQ">AVGO</a>), Cadence Design Systems Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CDNS#NASDAQ">CDNS</a>) and Synopsys Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SNPS#NASDAQ">SNPS</a>). Goldman is Neutral on Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMD#NASDAQ">AMD</a>), Arm Holdings PLC (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ARM#NASDAQ">ARM</a>) and Marvell Technology Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MRVL#NASDAQ">MRVL</a>). 
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Nvidia And Broadcom Are Still The Big AI Bets</h3>
Goldman sees Nvidia as the primary beneficiary of the ongoing AI buildout. Despite talk of &#8220;peak AI&#8221; and rising competition from custom chips, Nvidia's strong product lineup, broad customer base and early signs of AI revenue give it the edge. Goldman set a $185 price target on the stock, or 12% above current market prices.
Broadcom is also a top pick. Goldman expects AI-related revenue to make up more than 40% of its total by 2026. Its strength in custom silicon for cloud giants and a solid software business make it one of the most reliable names in the space. Price target: $315, implying a 15% surge from current levels. 
"We believe the company will leverage its leadership in enterprise networking silicon to drive outsized share in custom silicon for hyperscalers," Schneider said about Broadcom. 
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The Quiet Power Of Cadence And Synopsys</h3>
Chip design is getting more complex, and that's where software firms like Cadence and Synopsys come in.
Cadence, with a $380 price target, is gaining from the rise in custom chip development. More companies are designing their own AI chips, and Cadence provides the tools they need.
Synopsys, targeted at $620, is a key player in physical chip design. Its customer base is growing fast, and Goldman sees big upside—especially if its acquisition of Ansys goes through as planned.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">AMD, Arm, Marvell: Neutral For Now</h3>
Goldman is cautious on AMD, Arm and Marvell. While all three are involved in AI, they don't offer the same upside potential right now.
&#8220;Our ratings reflect a more negative risk/reward skew on these companies' shares from current levels, or areas where we see additional downside risk to fundamentals," Schneider said.
AMD is in the AI race but faces tough competition from Nvidia and others. Arm has potential, but its growth depends on how widely its chip architecture spreads outside of smartphones. Marvell has AI exposure, but Goldman doesn't see enough upside right now to recommend buying.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">AI Is Already Saving Money—and That's Just the Start</h3>
Goldman says the first wave of AI tools is already helping companies cut costs—especially by reducing headcount. The firm estimates these tools could save Fortune 500 companies about $935 billion by 2030. That cash could then fuel more investment in AI that actually drives revenue.
Right now, real monetization is limited. Most AI tools still aren&#8217;t making serious money. But social media platforms are showing more engagement and better ad conversions. E-commerce is improving through smarter recommendation engines. That's the start of what could be a major return cycle.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Key AI Trends To Watch</h3>
Goldman laid out five major themes for the chip sector in the next 12 to 24 months:
<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li>AI spending is shifting from hype to real returns</li>
<li>Inventory cycles and demand mismatches will matter more</li>
<li>Geopolitical risks could reshape supply chains</li>
<li>The battle between chip architectures—x86, ARM, RISC-V—is heating up</li>
<li>Companies must decide between standard chips or building custom ones</li>
</ol>
Read Next:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/equities/25/07/46367400/why-ionq-is-my-top-stock-pick-for-2025">Why IonQ Is My Top Stock Pick For 2025 </a></li>
</ul>
Photo: Shutterstock

Equities

Large Cap

Tech

AVGO

CDNS

MRVL

NVDA

SNPS

Goldman Sachs: 4 Must-Buy Chip Stocks, And A Few You Should Forget

Scotiabank analyst Orest Wowkodaw maintains Altius Minerals (TSX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ALS#TSX">ALS</a>) with a Sector Outperform and raises the price target from C$32.5 to C$35.

TSX:ALS

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Outperform on Altius Minerals, Raises Price Target to C$35

Financial giants have made a conspicuous bullish move on GE Vernova. Our analysis of options history for GE Vernova (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GEV#NYSE">GEV</a>) revealed 11 unusual trades.
Delving into the details, we found 36% of traders were bullish, while 36% showed bearish tendencies. Out of all the trades we spotted, 2 were puts, with a value of $127,486, and 9 were calls, valued at $3,729,020.
<h3>Expected Price Movements</h3>
Based on the trading activity, it appears that the significant investors are aiming for a price territory stretching from $450.0 to $700.0 for GE Vernova over the recent three months. 
<h3>Analyzing Volume &amp; Open Interest</h3>
In terms of liquidity and interest, the mean open interest for GE Vernova options trades today is 448.6 with a total volume of 1,146.00.
In the following chart, we are able to follow the development of volume and open interest of call and put options for GE Vernova's big money trades within a strike price range of $450.0 to $700.0 over the last 30 days.
<h3>GE Vernova Call and Put Volume: 30-Day Overview</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1752246081_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Largest Options Trades Observed:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th>Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>GEV</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>02/20/26</td>
<td>$33.0</td>
<td>$30.6</td>
<td>$31.3</td>
<td>$700.00</td>
<td>$3.1M</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>1.0K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GEV</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$131.8</td>
<td>$129.5</td>
<td>$131.8</td>
<td>$450.00</td>
<td>$184.5K</td>
<td>207</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GEV</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>01/15/27</td>
<td>$94.0</td>
<td>$90.0</td>
<td>$92.93</td>
<td>$670.00</td>
<td>$166.7K</td>
<td>3.1K</td>
<td>23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GEV</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>08/15/25</td>
<td>$25.1</td>
<td>$23.3</td>
<td>$24.5</td>
<td>$520.00</td>
<td>$98.0K</td>
<td>134</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GEV</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>NEUTRAL</td>
<td>08/08/25</td>
<td>$31.8</td>
<td>$31.4</td>
<td>$31.4</td>
<td>$545.00</td>
<td>$65.9K</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>23</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About GE Vernova</h3>
GE Vernova is a global leader in the electric power industry, with products and services that generate, transfer, convert, and store electricity. The company has three business segments: power, wind, and electrification. Power includes gas, nuclear, hydroelectric, and steam technologies, providing dispatchable power. The wind segment includes wind generation technologies, inclusive of onshore and offshore wind turbines and blades. Electrification includes grid solutions, power conversion, electrification software, and solar and storage solutions technologies required for the transmission, distribution, conversion, and storage of electricity from the point of generation to point of consumption.
Having examined the options trading patterns of GE Vernova, our attention now turns directly to the company. This shift allows us to delve into its present market position and performance
<h3>GE Vernova's Current Market Status</h3>
<ul>
<li>Trading volume stands at 463,071, with GEV's price up by 0.91%, positioned at $544.26.</li>
<li>RSI indicators show the stock to be may be overbought.</li>
<li>Earnings announcement expected in 12 days.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Professional Analyst Ratings for GE Vernova</h3>
In the last month, 5 experts released ratings on this stock with an average target price of $602.6.
Turn $1000 into $1270 in just 20 days?
20-year pro options trader reveals his one-line chart technique that shows when to buy and sell. Copy his trades, which have had averaged a 27% profit every 20 days. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/options-moneyline-2/?t=Moop1arja3be22op14&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=options-activity&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>. 
&#x2A; Reflecting concerns, an analyst from Seaport Global lowers its rating to Buy with a new price target of $630. 
&#x2A; Consistent in their evaluation, an analyst from Morgan Stanley keeps a Overweight rating on GE Vernova with a target price of $511. 
&#x2A; An analyst from BMO Capital has decided to maintain their Outperform rating on GE Vernova, which currently sits at a price target of $590. 
&#x2A; Consistent in their evaluation, an analyst from Barclays keeps a Overweight rating on GE Vernova with a target price of $580. 
&#x2A; Reflecting concerns, an analyst from GLJ Research lowers its rating to Buy with a new price target of $702.
Options are a riskier asset compared to just trading the stock, but they have higher profit potential. Serious options traders manage this risk by educating themselves daily, scaling in and out of trades, following more than one indicator, and following the markets closely.
If you want to stay updated on the latest options trades for GE Vernova, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a> gives you real-time options trades alerts.

Options

Looking At GE Vernova's Recent Unusual Options Activity

Deep-pocketed investors have adopted a bearish approach towards JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/JPM#NYSE">JPM</a>), and it's something market players shouldn't ignore. Our tracking of public options records at Benzinga unveiled this significant move today. The identity of these investors remains unknown, but such a substantial move in JPM usually suggests something big is about to happen.
We gleaned this information from our observations today when Benzinga's options scanner highlighted 15 extraordinary options activities for JPMorgan Chase. This level of activity is out of the ordinary.
The general mood among these heavyweight investors is divided, with 33% leaning bullish and 53% bearish. Among these notable options, 3 are puts, totaling $159,350, and 12 are calls, amounting to $643,740.
<h3>Expected Price Movements</h3>
After evaluating the trading volumes and Open Interest, it's evident that the major market movers are focusing on a price band between $200.0 and $340.0 for JPMorgan Chase, spanning the last three months.
<h3>Volume &amp; Open Interest Trends</h3>
Looking at the volume and open interest is a powerful move while trading options. This data can help you track the liquidity and interest for JPMorgan Chase's options for a given strike price. Below, we can observe the evolution of the volume and open interest of calls and puts, respectively, for all of JPMorgan Chase's whale trades within a strike price range from $200.0 to $340.0 in the last 30 days. 
<h3>JPMorgan Chase Option Activity Analysis: Last 30 Days</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1752246076_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Noteworthy Options Activity:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th align="right">Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>JPM</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$14.35</td>
<td>$14.25</td>
<td>$14.25</td>
<td>$300.00</td>
<td>$128.2K</td>
<td>8.8K</td>
<td align="right">95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JPM</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>11/21/25</td>
<td>$84.4</td>
<td>$83.5</td>
<td>$83.5</td>
<td>$205.00</td>
<td>$125.2K</td>
<td>84</td>
<td align="right">15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JPM</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>07/11/25</td>
<td>$84.9</td>
<td>$84.15</td>
<td>$84.9</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
<td>$101.8K</td>
<td>12</td>
<td align="right">12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JPM</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>11/21/25</td>
<td>$15.45</td>
<td>$15.0</td>
<td>$15.14</td>
<td>$285.00</td>
<td>$75.7K</td>
<td>212</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JPM</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>11/21/25</td>
<td>$17.05</td>
<td>$17.0</td>
<td>$17.05</td>
<td>$290.00</td>
<td>$51.1K</td>
<td>28</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About JPMorgan Chase</h3>
JPMorgan Chase is one of the largest and most complex financial institutions in the United States, with nearly $4 trillion in assets. It is organized into four major segments: consumer and community banking, corporate and investment banking, commercial banking, and asset and wealth management. JPMorgan operates, and is subject to regulation, in multiple countries.
After a thorough review of the options trading surrounding JPMorgan Chase, we move to examine the company in more detail. This includes an assessment of its current market status and performance.
<h3>JPMorgan Chase's Current Market Status</h3>
<ul>
<li>Currently trading with a volume of 1,584,058, the JPM's price is down by -1.1%, now at $285.02. </li>
<li>RSI readings suggest the stock is currently may be approaching overbought.</li>
<li>Anticipated earnings release is in 4 days.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Professional Analyst Ratings for JPMorgan Chase</h3>
A total of 5 professional analysts have given their take on this stock in the last 30 days, setting an average price target of $285.6.
Unusual Options Activity Detected: Smart Money on the Move
Benzinga Edge's Unusual Options board spots potential market movers before they happen. See what positions big money is taking on your favorite stocks. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22bz20&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=options-activity&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>. 
&#x2A; An analyst from Truist Securities persists with their Hold rating on JPMorgan Chase, maintaining a target price of $290. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from Morgan Stanley continues to hold a Equal-Weight rating for JPMorgan Chase, targeting a price of $240. 
&#x2A; Consistent in their evaluation, an analyst from B of A Securities keeps a Buy rating on JPMorgan Chase with a target price of $325. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from Evercore ISI Group continues to hold a Outperform rating for JPMorgan Chase, targeting a price of $298. 
&#x2A; An analyst from Citigroup has decided to maintain their Neutral rating on JPMorgan Chase, which currently sits at a price target of $275. 
Trading options involves greater risks but also offers the potential for higher profits. Savvy traders mitigate these risks through ongoing education, strategic trade adjustments, utilizing various indicators, and staying attuned to market dynamics. Keep up with the latest options trades for JPMorgan Chase with <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a> for real-time alerts.

JPMorgan Chase Options Trading: A Deep Dive into Market Sentiment

Whales with a lot of money to spend have taken a noticeably bearish stance on Citigroup.
Looking at options history for Citigroup (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/C#NYSE">C</a>) we detected 19 trades.
If we consider the specifics of each trade, it is accurate to state that 36% of the investors opened trades with bullish expectations and 42% with bearish.
From the overall spotted trades, 5 are puts, for a total amount of $5,624,800 and 14, calls, for a total amount of $916,889.
<h3>Expected Price Movements</h3>
Taking into account the Volume and Open Interest on these contracts, it appears that whales have been targeting a price range from $30.0 to $120.0 for Citigroup over the last 3 months. 
<h3>Volume &amp; Open Interest Trends</h3>
Assessing the volume and open interest is a strategic step in options trading. These metrics shed light on the liquidity and investor interest in Citigroup's options at specified strike prices. The forthcoming data visualizes the fluctuation in volume and open interest for both calls and puts, linked to Citigroup's substantial trades, within a strike price spectrum from $30.0 to $120.0 over the preceding 30 days.
<h3>Citigroup 30-Day Option Volume &amp; Interest Snapshot</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1752246071_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Biggest Options Spotted:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th align="right">Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>C</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/17/27</td>
<td>$35.1</td>
<td>$33.4</td>
<td>$34.92</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$3.4M</td>
<td>0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>C</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>NEUTRAL</td>
<td>12/18/26</td>
<td>$18.55</td>
<td>$18.2</td>
<td>$18.37</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
<td>$1.8M</td>
<td>1.0K</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>C</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>08/01/25</td>
<td>$6.65</td>
<td>$6.6</td>
<td>$6.6</td>
<td>$80.00</td>
<td>$283.8K</td>
<td>1.7K</td>
<td align="right">430</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>C</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$8.5</td>
<td>$8.4</td>
<td>$8.52</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
<td>$213.0K</td>
<td>3.1K</td>
<td align="right">767</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>C</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>07/25/25</td>
<td>$2.17</td>
<td>$2.14</td>
<td>$2.16</td>
<td>$86.00</td>
<td>$85.5K</td>
<td>401</td>
<td align="right">437</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About Citigroup</h3>
Citigroup is a global financial-services company doing business in more than 100 countries and jurisdictions. Citigroup's operations are organized into five primary segments: services, markets, banking, US personal banking, and wealth management. The bank's primary services include cross-border banking needs for multinational corporates, investment banking and trading, and credit card services in the United States.
Having examined the options trading patterns of Citigroup, our attention now turns directly to the company. This shift allows us to delve into its present market position and performance
<h3>Where Is Citigroup Standing Right Now?</h3>
<ul>
<li>Currently trading with a volume of 2,477,432, the C's price is down by -1.55%, now at $85.73. </li>
<li>RSI readings suggest the stock is currently may be overbought.</li>
<li>Anticipated earnings release is in 4 days.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Expert Opinions on Citigroup</h3>
Over the past month, 5 industry analysts have shared their insights on this stock, proposing an average target price of $93.4.
Turn $1000 into $1270 in just 20 days?
20-year pro options trader reveals his one-line chart technique that shows when to buy and sell. Copy his trades, which have had averaged a 27% profit every 20 days. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/options-moneyline-2/?t=Moop1arja3be22op14&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=options-activity&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from B of A Securities continues to hold a Buy rating for Citigroup, targeting a price of $100. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from Evercore ISI Group continues to hold a In-Line rating for Citigroup, targeting a price of $77. 
&#x2A; An analyst from Morgan Stanley persists with their Overweight rating on Citigroup, maintaining a target price of $103. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from Truist Securities continues to hold a Buy rating for Citigroup, targeting a price of $93. 
&#x2A; An analyst from Morgan Stanley persists with their Overweight rating on Citigroup, maintaining a target price of $94. 
Options trading presents higher risks and potential rewards. Astute traders manage these risks by continually educating themselves, adapting their strategies, monitoring multiple indicators, and keeping a close eye on market movements. Stay informed about the latest Citigroup options trades with real-time alerts from <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>.

Check Out What Whales Are Doing With Citigroup

In today's fast-paced and highly competitive business world, it is crucial for investors and industry followers to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Broadcom (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AVGO#NASDAQ">AVGO</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market standing, and growth prospects, our objective is to provide valuable insights and highlight company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Broadcom Background</h3>
Broadcom is the sixth-largest semiconductor company globally and has expanded into various software businesses, with over $30 billion in annual revenue. It sells 17 core semiconductor product lines across wireless, networking, broadband, storage, and industrial markets. It is primarily a fabless designer but holds some manufacturing in-house, like for its best-of-breed FBAR filters that sell into the Apple iPhone. In software, it sells virtualization, infrastructure, and security software to large enterprises, financial institutions, and governments.Broadcom is the product of consolidation. Its businesses are an amalgamation of former companies like legacy Broadcom and Avago Technologies in chips, as well as Brocade, CA Technologies, and Symantec in software.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>101.42</td>
<td>18.78</td>
<td>23.52</td>
<td>7.12%</td>
<td>$8.02</td>
<td>$10.2</td>
<td>20.16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>52.54</td>
<td>47.38</td>
<td>27.13</td>
<td>23.01%</td>
<td>$22.58</td>
<td>$26.67</td>
<td>69.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>27.03</td>
<td>7.67</td>
<td>11.14</td>
<td>8.19%</td>
<td>$608.71</td>
<td>$493.4</td>
<td>41.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>101.03</td>
<td>3.88</td>
<td>8.15</td>
<td>1.23%</td>
<td>$1.59</td>
<td>$3.74</td>
<td>35.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>40.98</td>
<td>11.98</td>
<td>12.39</td>
<td>7.08%</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
<td>$2.31</td>
<td>11.14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>16.26</td>
<td>6.31</td>
<td>4.24</td>
<td>10.3%</td>
<td>$3.67</td>
<td>$6.04</td>
<td>16.93%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>197.36</td>
<td>22.93</td>
<td>39.27</td>
<td>3.17%</td>
<td>$0.46</td>
<td>$1.21</td>
<td>33.73%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>22.03</td>
<td>2.70</td>
<td>4.09</td>
<td>3.79%</td>
<td>$4.33</td>
<td>$3.51</td>
<td>36.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>65.96</td>
<td>3.44</td>
<td>12.33</td>
<td>1.63%</td>
<td>$1.2</td>
<td>$1.61</td>
<td>22.28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>20.04</td>
<td>11.01</td>
<td>15.30</td>
<td>4.17%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.35</td>
<td>39.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>27.09</td>
<td>1.61</td>
<td>2.43</td>
<td>0.32%</td>
<td>$0.51</td>
<td>$0.84</td>
<td>-27.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>40.12</td>
<td>3.01</td>
<td>3.72</td>
<td>-5.78%</td>
<td>$-0.37</td>
<td>$0.29</td>
<td>-22.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>19.91</td>
<td>2.10</td>
<td>1.09</td>
<td>2.39%</td>
<td>$27.16</td>
<td>$24.89</td>
<td>11.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>12.01</td>
<td>1.44</td>
<td>2.35</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$23.86</td>
<td>$15.45</td>
<td>5.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>14.10</td>
<td>2.17</td>
<td>4.19</td>
<td>2.59%</td>
<td>$0.35</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>6.35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>336.52</td>
<td>24.58</td>
<td>40.48</td>
<td>5.63%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>179.73%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Skyworks Solutions Inc</td>
<td>30.32</td>
<td>1.96</td>
<td>3.16</td>
<td>1.11%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$0.39</td>
<td>-8.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qorvo Inc</td>
<td>154.97</td>
<td>2.46</td>
<td>2.31</td>
<td>0.93%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>-7.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>145.38</td>
<td>10.45</td>
<td>15.21</td>
<td>0.71%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>-14.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Universal Display Corp</td>
<td>32.68</td>
<td>4.50</td>
<td>11.55</td>
<td>3.93%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>0.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>71.39</td>
<td>9.03</td>
<td>11.61</td>
<td>4.02%</td>
<td>$36.66</td>
<td>$30.62</td>
<td>22.62%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>After a detailed analysis of Broadcom, the following trends become apparent: 
<ul>
<li>
Notably, the current Price to Earnings ratio for this stock, 101.42, is 1.42x above the industry norm, reflecting a higher valuation relative to the industry.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 18.78 which exceeds the industry average by 2.08x.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 23.52, which is 2.03x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 7.12% that is 3.1% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
With lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $8.02 Billion, which is 0.22x below the industry average, the company may face lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
The gross profit of $10.2 Billion is 0.33x below that of its industry, suggesting potential lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
The company is witnessing a substantial decline in revenue growth, with a rate of 20.16% compared to the industry average of 22.62%, which indicates a challenging sales environment.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1752246059_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a financial metric that helps determine the level of financial risk associated with a company's capital structure.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When assessing Broadcom against its top 4 peers using the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following comparisons can be made:
<ul>
<li>
Among its top 4 peers, Broadcom has a higher debt-to-equity ratio of 0.97.
</li>
<li>
This suggests a greater reliance on debt financing, which can expose the company to increased financial risk and potential volatility.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
The high PE, PB, and PS ratios of Broadcom indicate that the company is relatively overvalued compared to its peers in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. On the other hand, Broadcom's high ROE suggests strong profitability performance, while its low EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth indicate potential areas of concern that may impact its competitive position within the industry.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Analyzing Broadcom In Comparison To Competitors In Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment Industry

A substantial insider sell was reported on July 10, by Lisa Utzschneider, Chief Executive Officer at Integral Ad Science Holdi (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IAS#NASDAQ">IAS</a>), based on the recent SEC filing.
What Happened: Utzschneider's recent Form 4 filing with the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001842718/000184271825000087//Archives/edgar/data/1842718/000184271825000087/0001842718-25-000087-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> on Thursday unveiled the sale of 14,904 shares of Integral Ad Science Holdi. The total transaction value is $123,852.
As of Friday morning, Integral Ad Science Holdi shares are down by 0.97%, currently priced at $8.15.
<h3>Get to Know Integral Ad Science Holdi Better</h3>
Integral Ad Science Holding Corp is a digital advertising verification company. The cloud-based technology platform of the company delivers independent measurement and verification of digital advertising across all devices, channels, and formats, including desktop, mobile, connected TV, social, display, and video. Geographically, the company derives a majority of its revenue from the Americas region.
<h3>Unraveling the Financial Story of Integral Ad Science Holdi</h3>
Revenue Growth: Integral Ad Science Holdi's remarkable performance in 3 months is evident. As of 31 March, 2025, the company achieved an impressive revenue growth rate of 17.06%. This signifies a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company surpassed expectations with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Communication Services sector.
Analyzing Profitability Metrics:
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: Achieving a high gross margin of 77.53%, the company performs well in terms of cost management and profitability within its sector.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): Integral Ad Science Holdi's EPS reflects a decline, falling below the industry average with a current EPS of 0.05.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: Integral Ad Science Holdi's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of 0.04.
Understanding Financial Valuation:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: The Price to Earnings ratio of 28.62 is lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: The P/S ratio of 2.53 is lower than the industry average, implying a discounted valuation for Integral Ad Science Holdi's stock in relation to sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): The company's EV/EBITDA ratio of 9.87 trails industry averages, indicating a potential disparity in market valuation that could be advantageous for investors.
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization reflects a smaller scale relative to peers. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>The Importance of Insider Transactions</h3>
Insider transactions shouldn't be used primarily to make an investing decision, however, they can be an important factor for an investor to consider.
In legal terms, an "insider" refers to any officer, director, or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of a company's equity securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This can include executives in the c-suite and large hedge funds. These insiders are required to let the public know of their transactions via a Form 4 filing, which must be filed within two business days of the transaction.
When a company insider makes a new purchase, that is an indication that they expect the stock to rise.
Insider sells, on the other hand, can be made for a variety of reasons, and may not necessarily mean that the seller thinks the stock will go down. 
<h3>Cracking Transaction Codes</h3>
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">Investors</a> prefer focusing on transactions that take place in the open market, indicated in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 indicates a purchase, while S indicates a sale. Transaction code C indicates the conversion of an option, and transaction code A indicates grant, award or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0001842718">Check Out The Full List Of Integral Ad Science Holdi's Insider Trades.</a>
Insider Buying Alert: Profit from C-Suite Moves
Benzinga Edge reveals every insider trade in real-time. Don't miss the next big stock move driven by insider confidence. Unlock this ultimate sentiment indicator now. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22in8&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Insider Trades

Chief Executive Officer Of Integral Ad Science Holdi Sold $123K In Stock

Aaron Yeon Ho Lee, Board Member at Acushnet Holdings (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOLF#NYSE">GOLF</a>), disclosed an insider sell on July 10, according to a recent SEC filing.
What Happened: Lee's decision to sell 953,406 shares of Acushnet Holdings was revealed in a Form 4 filing with the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001672013/000112760225019076//Archives/edgar/data/1672013/000112760225019076/0001127602-25-019076-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> on Thursday. The total value of the sale is $62,508,443.
In the Friday's morning session, Acushnet Holdings's shares are currently trading at $78.25, experiencing a down of 0.0%.
<h3>All You Need to Know About Acushnet Holdings</h3>
Acushnet Holdings Corp is engaged in the design, development, manufacture, and distribution of golf products. Its product category includes golf balls, golf shoes, golf clubs, wedges, putters, golf gloves, golf gear and golf wear, and others. These products are offered through different brands such as Titleist, FootJoy, Scotty Cemeron, Vokey Design, Pinnacle, KJUS, and others. The company's reportable segments are Titleist golf equipment, FootJoy golf wear, and Gofl gear. A majority of its revenue is generated by the Titleist golf equipment segment. Geographically, the company generates maximum revenue from the United States, followed by Europe, Middle East and Asia (EMEA), Japan, Korea, and the Rest of the world.
<h3>Unraveling the Financial Story of Acushnet Holdings</h3>
Decline in Revenue: Over the 3 months period, Acushnet Holdings faced challenges, resulting in a decline of approximately -0.59% in revenue growth as of 31 March, 2025. This signifies a reduction in the company's top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Consumer Discretionary sector, the company faces challenges, achieving a growth rate lower than the average among peers.
Profitability Metrics: Unlocking Value
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: The company sets a benchmark with a high gross margin of 47.94%, reflecting superior cost management and profitability compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): Acushnet Holdings's EPS is a standout, portraying a positive bottom-line trend that exceeds the industry average with a current EPS of 1.62.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: With a high debt-to-equity ratio of 1.21, Acushnet Holdings faces challenges in effectively managing its debt levels, indicating potential financial strain.
Navigating Market Valuation:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Acushnet Holdings's P/E ratio of 21.35 is below the industry average, suggesting the stock may be undervalued.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: The current P/S ratio of 1.99 is above industry norms, reflecting an elevated valuation for Acushnet Holdings's stock and potential overvaluation based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): At 14.62, the company's EV/EBITDA ratio outperforms industry norms, reflecting positive market perception. This positioning indicates optimistic expectations for the company's future performance.
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization Analysis: With an elevated market capitalization, the company stands out above industry averages, showcasing substantial size and market acknowledgment.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>Navigating the Impact of Insider Transactions on Investments</h3>
Insider transactions are not the sole determinant of investment choices, but they are a factor worth considering.
Within the legal framework, an "insider" is defined as any officer, director, or beneficial owner holding more than ten percent of a company's equity securities as per Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This includes executives in the c-suite and major hedge funds. These insiders are mandated to disclose their transactions through a Form 4 filing, to be submitted within two business days of the transaction.
The initiation of a new purchase by a company insider serves as a strong indication that they expect the stock to rise.
However, insider sells may not always signal a bearish view and can be influenced by various factors.
<h3>A Deep Dive into Insider Transaction Codes</h3>
When it comes to transactions, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">investors</a> tend to focus on those in the open market, detailed in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 denotes a purchase, while S indicates a sale. Transaction code C signals the conversion of an option, and transaction code A denotes a grant, award, or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0001672013">Check Out The Full List Of Acushnet Holdings's Insider Trades.</a>
Insider Buying Alert: Profit from C-Suite Moves
Benzinga Edge reveals every insider trade in real-time. Don't miss the next big stock move driven by insider confidence. Unlock this ultimate sentiment indicator now. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22in8&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

GOLF

Sell Alert: Aaron Yeon Ho Lee Cashes Out $62.51M In Acushnet Holdings Stock

It was reported on July 10, that Kevin Chang Keun Yoon, Director at Acushnet Holdings (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOLF#NYSE">GOLF</a>) executed a significant insider sell, according to an SEC filing.
What Happened: Yoon opted to sell 953,406 shares of Acushnet Holdings, according to a Form 4 filing with the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001672013/000112760225019077//Archives/edgar/data/1672013/000112760225019077/0001127602-25-019077-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> on Thursday. The transaction's total worth stands at $62,508,443.
At Friday morning, Acushnet Holdings shares are down by 0.0%, trading at $78.25.
<h3>About Acushnet Holdings</h3>
Acushnet Holdings Corp is engaged in the design, development, manufacture, and distribution of golf products. Its product category includes golf balls, golf shoes, golf clubs, wedges, putters, golf gloves, golf gear and golf wear, and others. These products are offered through different brands such as Titleist, FootJoy, Scotty Cemeron, Vokey Design, Pinnacle, KJUS, and others. The company's reportable segments are Titleist golf equipment, FootJoy golf wear, and Gofl gear. A majority of its revenue is generated by the Titleist golf equipment segment. Geographically, the company generates maximum revenue from the United States, followed by Europe, Middle East and Asia (EMEA), Japan, Korea, and the Rest of the world.
<h3>Acushnet Holdings's Economic Impact: An Analysis</h3>
Decline in Revenue: Over the 3 months period, Acushnet Holdings faced challenges, resulting in a decline of approximately -0.59% in revenue growth as of 31 March, 2025. This signifies a reduction in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the revenue growth lags behind its industry peers. The company achieved a growth rate lower than the average among peers in Consumer Discretionary sector.
Exploring Profitability:
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: The company sets a benchmark with a high gross margin of 47.94%, reflecting superior cost management and profitability compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): Acushnet Holdings's EPS outshines the industry average, indicating a strong bottom-line trend with a current EPS of 1.62.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: With a high debt-to-equity ratio of 1.21, Acushnet Holdings faces challenges in effectively managing its debt levels, indicating potential financial strain.
Understanding Financial Valuation:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Acushnet Holdings's P/E ratio of 21.35 is below the industry average, suggesting the stock may be undervalued.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: With a higher-than-average P/S ratio of 1.99, Acushnet Holdings's stock is perceived as being overvalued in the market, particularly in relation to sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): At 14.62, the company's EV/EBITDA ratio outperforms industry norms, reflecting positive market perception. This positioning indicates optimistic expectations for the company's future performance.
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is above the industry average, indicating that it is relatively larger in size compared to peers. This may suggest a higher level of investor confidence and market recognition.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>Uncovering the Importance of Insider Activity</h3>
Emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive approach, considering insider transactions is valuable, but it's crucial to evaluate them in conjunction with other investment factors.
In legal terms, an "insider" refers to any officer, director, or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of a company's equity securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This can include executives in the c-suite and large hedge funds. These insiders are required to let the public know of their transactions via a Form 4 filing, which must be filed within two business days of the transaction.
When a company insider makes a new purchase, that is an indication that they expect the stock to rise.
Insider sells, on the other hand, can be made for a variety of reasons, and may not necessarily mean that the seller thinks the stock will go down. 
<h3>Exploring Key Transaction Codes</h3>
When analyzing transactions, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">investors</a> tend to focus on those in the open market, detailed in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 denotes a purchase,while S signifies a sale. Transaction code C signals the conversion of an option, and transaction code A denotes a grant, award, or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0001672013">Check Out The Full List Of Acushnet Holdings's Insider Trades.</a>
Insider Buying Alert: Profit from C-Suite Moves
Benzinga Edge reveals every insider trade in real-time. Don't miss the next big stock move driven by insider confidence. Unlock this ultimate sentiment indicator now. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22in8&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Sell Alert: Kevin Chang Keun Yoon Cashes Out $62.51M In Acushnet Holdings Stock

In the dynamic and fiercely competitive business environment, conducting a thorough analysis of companies is crucial for investors and industry enthusiasts. In this article, we will perform an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Amazon.com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Broadline Retail industry. By closely examining crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Amazon.com Background</h3>
Amazon is the leading online retailer and marketplace for third party sellers. Retail related revenue represents approximately 75% of total, followed by Amazon Web Services' cloud computing, storage, database, and other offerings (15%), advertising services (5% to 10%), and other the remainder. International segments constitute 25% to 30% of Amazon's non-AWS sales, led by Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Amazon.com Inc</td>
<td>36.24</td>
<td>7.72</td>
<td>3.68</td>
<td>5.79%</td>
<td>$36.48</td>
<td>$78.69</td>
<td>8.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>13.90</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>1.81</td>
<td>1.23%</td>
<td>$21.8</td>
<td>$90.83</td>
<td>6.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PDD Holdings Inc</td>
<td>11.25</td>
<td>3.24</td>
<td>2.77</td>
<td>4.59%</td>
<td>$16.09</td>
<td>$54.73</td>
<td>10.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MercadoLibre Inc</td>
<td>60.94</td>
<td>25.10</td>
<td>5.61</td>
<td>10.56%</td>
<td>$0.92</td>
<td>$2.77</td>
<td>36.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coupang Inc</td>
<td>215.50</td>
<td>12.53</td>
<td>1.78</td>
<td>2.53%</td>
<td>$0.36</td>
<td>$2.32</td>
<td>11.16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JD.com Inc</td>
<td>7.69</td>
<td>1.39</td>
<td>0.29</td>
<td>4.6%</td>
<td>$14.27</td>
<td>$47.85</td>
<td>15.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>eBay Inc</td>
<td>18.35</td>
<td>7.11</td>
<td>3.63</td>
<td>9.95%</td>
<td>$0.77</td>
<td>$1.86</td>
<td>1.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc</td>
<td>39.27</td>
<td>4.53</td>
<td>3.37</td>
<td>2.78%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.24</td>
<td>13.35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vipshop Holdings Ltd</td>
<td>7.78</td>
<td>1.38</td>
<td>0.54</td>
<td>4.85%</td>
<td>$2.45</td>
<td>$6.08</td>
<td>-4.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dillard's Inc</td>
<td>12.02</td>
<td>3.65</td>
<td>1.06</td>
<td>8.97%</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>$0.69</td>
<td>-1.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MINISO Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>16.53</td>
<td>3.75</td>
<td>2.29</td>
<td>3.98%</td>
<td>$0.65</td>
<td>$1.96</td>
<td>18.89%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macy's Inc</td>
<td>6.31</td>
<td>0.76</td>
<td>0.15</td>
<td>0.84%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$2.0</td>
<td>-4.14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Savers Value Village Inc</td>
<td>73.21</td>
<td>3.84</td>
<td>1.10</td>
<td>-1.13%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>4.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kohl's Corp</td>
<td>8.58</td>
<td>0.28</td>
<td>0.07</td>
<td>-0.4%</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>$1.4</td>
<td>-4.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hour Loop Inc</td>
<td>163</td>
<td>9.85</td>
<td>0.41</td>
<td>11.93%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>4.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>46.74</td>
<td>5.66</td>
<td>1.78</td>
<td>4.66%</td>
<td>$4.16</td>
<td>$15.21</td>
<td>7.72%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By conducting a comprehensive analysis of Amazon.com, the following trends become evident: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 36.24 significantly below the industry average by 0.78x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 7.72, which is 1.36x the industry average, Amazon.com might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 3.68, which is 2.07x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 5.79%, which is 1.13% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $36.48 Billion, which is 8.77x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $78.69 Billion, which indicates 5.17x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 8.62% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 7.72%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1752246047_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio provides insights into the proportion of debt a company has in relation to its equity and asset value.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Amazon.com can be assessed by comparing it to its top 4 peers, resulting in the following observations:
<ul>
<li>
Amazon.com has a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers, as evidenced by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.44.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be perceived as a positive indicator by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Amazon.com, the PE ratio is low compared to its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest that the market values Amazon.com's assets and sales highly. Amazon.com's high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth outperform its industry peers, reflecting strong financial performance and growth potential.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AMZN

Assessing Amazon.com's Performance Against Competitors In Broadline Retail Industry

It was reported on July 10, that Gene Soo Yoon Yoon, Board Member at Acushnet Holdings (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOLF#NYSE">GOLF</a>) executed a significant insider sell, according to an SEC filing.
What Happened: Yoon's decision to sell 953,406 shares of Acushnet Holdings was revealed in a Form 4 filing with the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001672013/000112760225019078//Archives/edgar/data/1672013/000112760225019078/0001127602-25-019078-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> on Thursday. The total value of the sale is $62,508,443.
Acushnet Holdings shares are trading down 0.0% at $78.25 at the time of this writing on Friday morning.
<h3>About Acushnet Holdings</h3>
Acushnet Holdings Corp is engaged in the design, development, manufacture, and distribution of golf products. Its product category includes golf balls, golf shoes, golf clubs, wedges, putters, golf gloves, golf gear and golf wear, and others. These products are offered through different brands such as Titleist, FootJoy, Scotty Cemeron, Vokey Design, Pinnacle, KJUS, and others. The company's reportable segments are Titleist golf equipment, FootJoy golf wear, and Gofl gear. A majority of its revenue is generated by the Titleist golf equipment segment. Geographically, the company generates maximum revenue from the United States, followed by Europe, Middle East and Asia (EMEA), Japan, Korea, and the Rest of the world.
<h3>Financial Insights: Acushnet Holdings</h3>
Negative Revenue Trend: Examining Acushnet Holdings's financials over 3 months reveals challenges. As of 31 March, 2025, the company experienced a decline of approximately -0.59% in revenue growth, reflecting a decrease in top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company encountered difficulties, with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Consumer Discretionary sector.
Profitability Metrics: Unlocking Value
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: The company maintains a high gross margin of 47.94%, indicating strong cost management and profitability compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): Acushnet Holdings's EPS outshines the industry average, indicating a strong bottom-line trend with a current EPS of 1.62.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: With a high debt-to-equity ratio of 1.21, Acushnet Holdings faces challenges in effectively managing its debt levels, indicating potential financial strain.
Valuation Metrics:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: The P/E ratio of 21.35 is lower than the industry average, implying a discounted valuation for Acushnet Holdings's stock.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 1.99 as compared to the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): With an impressive EV/EBITDA ratio of 14.62, Acushnet Holdings demonstrates exemplary market valuation, surpassing industry averages.
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization Analysis: With an elevated market capitalization, the company stands out above industry averages, showcasing substantial size and market acknowledgment.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>The Relevance of Insider Transactions</h3>
In the complex landscape of investment decisions, investors should approach insider transactions as part of a comprehensive analysis, considering various elements.
Exploring the legal landscape, an "insider" is defined as any officer, director, or beneficial owner holding more than ten percent of a company's equity securities, as stipulated by Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This encompasses executives in the c-suite and major hedge funds. These insiders are required to report their transactions through a Form 4 filing, which must be submitted within two business days of the transaction.
Highlighted by a company insider's new purchase, there's a positive anticipation for the stock to rise.
But, insider sells may not necessarily indicate a bearish view and can be motivated by various factors.
<h3>Breaking Down the Significance of Transaction Codes</h3>
Surveying the realm of stock transactions, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">investors</a> often give prominence to those unfolding in the open market, systematically detailed in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 indicates a purchase, while S signifies a sale. Transaction code C denotes the conversion of an option, and transaction code A denotes a grant, award, or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0001672013">Check Out The Full List Of Acushnet Holdings's Insider Trades.</a>
Insider Buying Alert: Profit from C-Suite Moves
Benzinga Edge reveals every insider trade in real-time. Don't miss the next big stock move driven by insider confidence. Unlock this ultimate sentiment indicator now. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22in8&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Insider Decision: Gene Soo Yoon Yoon Offloads $62.51M Worth Of Acushnet Holdings Stock

In the ever-evolving and intensely competitive business landscape, conducting a thorough company analysis is of utmost importance for investors and industry followers. In this article, we will carry out an in-depth industry comparison, assessing Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) alongside its primary competitors in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry. By meticulously examining key financial metrics, market positioning, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights to investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Apple Background</h3>
Apple is among the largest companies in the world, with a broad portfolio of hardware and software products targeted at consumers and businesses. Apple's iPhone makes up a majority of the firm sales, and Apple's other products like Mac, iPad, and Watch are designed around the iPhone as the focal point of an expansive software ecosystem. Apple has progressively worked to add new applications, like streaming video, subscription bundles, and augmented reality. The firm designs its own software and semiconductors while working with subcontractors like Foxconn and TSMC to build its products and chips. Slightly less than half of Apple's sales come directly through its flagship stores, with a majority of sales coming indirectly through partnerships and distribution.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Apple Inc</td>
<td>32.89</td>
<td>47.21</td>
<td>8.02</td>
<td>37.11%</td>
<td>$32.25</td>
<td>$44.87</td>
<td>5.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Micro Computer Inc</td>
<td>27.18</td>
<td>4.68</td>
<td>1.46</td>
<td>1.72%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>19.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>1.14</td>
<td>0.88</td>
<td>-4.4%</td>
<td>$0.87</td>
<td>$2.17</td>
<td>5.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Western Digital Corp</td>
<td>22.14</td>
<td>4.36</td>
<td>1.46</td>
<td>5.86%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$0.91</td>
<td>30.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NetApp Inc</td>
<td>18.81</td>
<td>20.55</td>
<td>3.39</td>
<td>33.42%</td>
<td>$0.43</td>
<td>$1.19</td>
<td>3.84%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pure Storage Inc</td>
<td>153.18</td>
<td>15.29</td>
<td>6.15</td>
<td>-1.1%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.54</td>
<td>12.26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eastman Kodak Co</td>
<td>13.33</td>
<td>0.92</td>
<td>0.55</td>
<td>-1.66%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>-0.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Turtle Beach Corp</td>
<td>18.95</td>
<td>2.34</td>
<td>0.78</td>
<td>-0.55%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>14.42%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>39.08</td>
<td>7.04</td>
<td>2.1</td>
<td>4.76%</td>
<td>$0.25</td>
<td>$0.76</td>
<td>12.29%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By closely examining Apple, we can identify the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
With a Price to Earnings ratio of 32.89, which is 0.84x less than the industry average, the stock shows potential for growth at a reasonable price, making it an interesting consideration for market participants.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 47.21 relative to the industry average by 6.71x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 8.02, surpassing the industry average by 3.82x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 37.11% that is 32.35% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $32.25 Billion, which is 129.0x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The gross profit of $44.87 Billion is 59.04x above that of its industry, highlighting stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is witnessing a substantial decline in revenue growth, with a rate of 5.08% compared to the industry average of 12.29%, which indicates a challenging sales environment.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1752246038_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio helps evaluate the capital structure and financial leverage of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In light of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, a comparison between Apple and its top 4 peers reveals the following information:
<ul>
<li>
Among its top 4 peers, Apple is placed in the middle with a moderate debt-to-equity ratio of 1.47.
</li>
<li>
This implies a balanced financial structure, with a reasonable proportion of debt and equity.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Apple in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The PB and PS ratios are high, suggesting overvaluation relative to industry standards. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Apple demonstrates strong performance compared to its industry peers, reflecting favorable financial health and operational efficiency.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Comments

DLocal

Vendite allo scoperto

DLocal (NASDAQ:DLO) Azioni, Report sulle vendite allo scoperto

Notizie

PARTNER/COLLABORATORE

BENZINGA NEL MONDO