La catena delle opzioni mostra i dati chiave delle opzioni azionarie di Fortrea Holdings a vari prezzi di esercizio e date di scadenza. I trader utilizzano queste informazioni per analizzare potenziali operazioni e valutare il sentiment del mercato per Fortrea Holdings..

Fortrea Holdings (NASDAQ:FTRE) Azioni, Catena delle Opzioni

FORTREA HOLDINGS INC

Fortrea Holdings

Fortrea Holdings is a late-stage contract research organization, or CRO, that provides comprehensive Phase I through IV clinical trial management, clinical pharmacology, and patient access solutions. The company works with emerging and large biopharma, medical device, and diagnostic companies to run their clinical trials as a functional-service provider, full-service provider, and offers hybrid trials. In 2023, Fortrea was formed as an independent, publicly traded company after Labcorp spun off its clinical development business, which it acquired via its purchase of Covance in 2015 for $6.1 billion. Fortrea has 19,000 staff members across 90 countries.

News

Pre-Market Outlook

Markets

Trading Ideas

BEKE

FTRE

MNDY

Scopri i cinque titoli chiave da seguire nel pre-market di oggi, 12 agosto 2024, con focus su risultati e previsioni.

Pre-market: 5 titoli da monitorare oggi, 12 agosto 2024

Fortrea Holdings Inc

In the latest quarter, 13 analysts provided ratings for Citizens Financial Group (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CFG#NYSE">CFG</a>), showcasing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.
The following table summarizes their recent ratings, shedding light on the changing sentiments within the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">6</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have set 12-month price targets for Citizens Financial Group, revealing an average target of $47.54, a high estimate of $54.00, and a low estimate of $43.00. This current average has decreased by 10.44% from the previous average price target of $53.08. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747828883_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Breaking Down Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Examination</h2>
A clear picture of Citizens Financial Group's perception among financial experts is painted with a thorough analysis of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>David Chiaverini</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Peter Winter</td>
<td>DA Davidson</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
<td>$53.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ryan Merkel</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$48.00</td>
<td>$55.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Long</td>
<td>Raymond James</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Strong Buy</td>
<td>$48.00</td>
<td>$58.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scott Siefers</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$43.00</td>
<td>$48.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gerard Cassidy</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$44.00</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jason Goldberg</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
<td>$52.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brian Foran</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$43.00</td>
<td>$51.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Konrad</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$45.00</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vivek Juneja</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$43.00</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Keith Horowitz</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$51.00</td>
<td>$58.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brian Foran</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$51.00</td>
<td>$54.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Manan Gosalia</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$54.00</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Citizens Financial Group. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Offering insights into predictions, analysts assign qualitative values, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Citizens Financial Group compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts explore the dynamics of price targets, providing estimates for the future value of Citizens Financial Group's stock. This examination reveals shifts in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Understanding these analyst evaluations alongside key financial indicators can offer valuable insights into Citizens Financial Group's market standing. Stay informed and make well-considered decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CFG/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Citizens Financial Group analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Unveiling the Story Behind Citizens Financial Group</h2>
Citizens Financial Group Inc is a bank holding company headquartered in Providence, Rhode Island. Through the bank, it offers various retail and commercial banking products and services to individuals, small businesses, middle-market companies, large corporations, and institutions. The company's reportable segments are; Commercial Banking, Consumer Banking, Non-Core, and Others. A majority of its revenue is generated from the Consumer Banking segment, which serves consumer customers and small businesses, offering traditional banking products and services including deposits, mortgage and home equity lending, credit cards, small business loans, education loans, point-of-sale finance loans, and wealth management and investment services.
<h3>Citizens Financial Group: Delving into Financials</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization surpasses industry averages, showcasing a dominant size relative to peers and suggesting a strong market position.
Negative Revenue Trend: Examining Citizens Financial Group's financials over 3M reveals challenges. As of 31 March, 2025, the company experienced a decline of approximately -1.23% in revenue growth, reflecting a decrease in top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the revenue growth lags behind its industry peers. The company achieved a growth rate lower than the average among peers in Financials sector.
Net Margin: The company's net margin is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of 17.57%, the company may need to address challenges in effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): Citizens Financial Group's ROE is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of 1.51%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Return on Assets (ROA): Citizens Financial Group's ROA is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 0.16%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Debt Management: With a high debt-to-equity ratio of 0.54, Citizens Financial Group faces challenges in effectively managing its debt levels, indicating potential financial strain.
<h2>The Core of Analyst Ratings: What Every Investor Should Know</h2>
Experts in banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their comprehensive research involves attending company conference calls and meetings, analyzing financial statements, and engaging with insiders to generate what are known as analyst ratings for stocks. Typically, analysts assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Some analysts also offer predictions for helpful metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates to provide further guidance as to what to do with certain tickers. It is important to keep in mind that while stock and sector analysts are specialists, they are also human and can only forecast their beliefs to traders.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantag">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Analyst Ratings

Citizens Financial Group Stock: A Deep Dive Into Analyst Perspectives (13 Ratings)

Jefferies analyst David Chiaverini initiates coverage on Eagle Bancorp (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/EGBN#NASDAQ">EGBN</a>) with a Hold rating and announces Price Target of $20.

Price Target

Initiation

EGBN

Jefferies Initiates Coverage On Eagle Bancorp with Hold Rating, Announces Price Target of $20

Workday (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WDAY#NASDAQ">WDAY</a>) underwent analysis by 25 analysts in the last quarter, revealing a spectrum of viewpoints from bullish to bearish.
The table below provides a concise overview of recent ratings by analysts, offering insights into the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and drawing comparisons with the preceding months for a holistic perspective.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts' evaluations of 12-month price targets offer additional insights, showcasing an average target of $305.96, with a high estimate of $360.00 and a low estimate of $230.00. Witnessing a positive shift, the current average has risen by 0.87% from the previous average price target of $303.33.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747828871_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Interpreting Analyst Ratings: A Closer Look</h2>
The standing of Workday among financial experts becomes clear with a thorough analysis of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Scott Berg</td>
<td>Needham</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$300.00</td>
<td>$300.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Curtis Shauger</td>
<td>WestPark Capital</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$315.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brent Bracelin</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$230.00</td>
<td>$290.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Turrin</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$325.00</td>
<td>$360.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Keith Weiss</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$250.00</td>
<td>$275.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Siti Panigrahi</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$275.00</td>
<td>$320.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gil Luria</td>
<td>DA Davidson</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$230.00</td>
<td>$270.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brent Thill</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$325.00</td>
<td>$350.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scott Berg</td>
<td>Needham</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$300.00</td>
<td>$300.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Allan Verkhovski</td>
<td>Scotiabank</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Sector Outperform</td>
<td>$305.00</td>
<td>$355.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Allan Verkhovski</td>
<td>Scotiabank</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Sector Outperform</td>
<td>$355.00</td>
<td>$340.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Daniel Jester</td>
<td>BMO Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$314.00</td>
<td>$300.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yun Kim</td>
<td>Loop Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$285.00</td>
<td>$260.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Karl Keirstead</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$285.00</td>
<td>$255.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kash Rangan</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$345.00</td>
<td>$310.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Hynes</td>
<td>Canaccord Genuity</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$330.00</td>
<td>$300.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rishi Jaluria</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$340.00</td>
<td>$320.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mark Murphy</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$310.00</td>
<td>$285.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Patrick Walravens</td>
<td>Citizens Capital Markets</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Market Outperform</td>
<td>$315.00</td>
<td>$315.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Turrin</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$360.00</td>
<td>$330.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brad Reback</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$310.00</td>
<td>$270.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jason Celino</td>
<td>Keybanc</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$335.00</td>
<td>$305.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brian Schwartz</td>
<td>Oppenheimer</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$320.00</td>
<td>$300.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scott Berg</td>
<td>Needham</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$300.00</td>
<td>$300.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brent Bracelin</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$290.00</td>
<td>$270.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Workday. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Offering a comprehensive view, analysts assess stocks qualitatively, spanning from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Workday compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts navigate through adjustments in price targets, providing estimates for Workday's future value. Comparing current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
Considering these analyst evaluations in conjunction with other financial indicators can offer a comprehensive understanding of Workday's market position. Stay informed and make well-informed decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/WDAY/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Workday analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Unveiling the Story Behind Workday</h2>
Workday is a software company that offers human capital management, or HCM, financial management, and business planning solutions for enterprises. Known for being a cloud-only software provider, Workday was founded in 2005 and is headquartered in Pleasanton, California.
<h3>A Deep Dive into Workday's Financials</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is below the industry average, suggesting that it is relatively smaller compared to peers. This could be due to various factors, including perceived growth potential or operational scale.
Revenue Growth: Workday displayed positive results in 3M. As of 31 January, 2025, the company achieved a solid revenue growth rate of approximately 15.04%. This indicates a notable increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the company achieved a growth rate higher than the average among peers in Information Technology sector.
Net Margin: Workday's net margin excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 4.25%. This signifies efficient cost management and strong financial health.
Return on Equity (ROE): The company's ROE is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in efficiently using equity capital. With an ROE of 1.06%, the company may need to address challenges in generating satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): Workday's ROA is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 0.55%, the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns from its assets.
Debt Management: Workday's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of 0.37.
<h2>How Are Analyst Ratings Determined?</h2>
Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
In addition to their assessments, some analysts extend their insights by offering predictions for key metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates. This supplementary information provides further guidance for traders. It is crucial to recognize that, despite their specialization, analysts are human and can only provide forecasts based on their beliefs.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantag">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

WDAY

Breaking Down Workday: 25 Analysts Share Their Views

Ratings for Comerica (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CMA#NYSE">CMA</a>) were provided by 16 analysts in the past three months, showcasing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.
The following table encapsulates their recent ratings, offering a glimpse into the evolving sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Insights from analysts' 12-month price targets are revealed, presenting an average target of $60.81, a high estimate of $75.00, and a low estimate of $47.00. A negative shift in sentiment is evident as analysts have decreased the average price target by 12.5%. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747828857_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Investigating Analyst Ratings: An Elaborate Study</h2>
The analysis of recent analyst actions sheds light on the perception of Comerica by financial experts. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>David Chiaverini</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Underperform</td>
<td>$47.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brandon King</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$57.00</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ryan Nash</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$57.00</td>
<td>$66.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Karl Shepard</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Christopher Mcgratty</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$68.00</td>
<td>$77.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Pancari</td>
<td>Evercore ISI Group</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underperform</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mike Mayo</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$55.00</td>
<td>$67.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David George</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
<td>$80.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Anthony Elian</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$52.00</td>
<td>$64.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nicholas Holowko</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$59.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Manan Gosalia</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$55.00</td>
<td>$63.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Rose</td>
<td>Raymond James</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$67.00</td>
<td>$72.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Terry McEvoy</td>
<td>Stephens &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$64.00</td>
<td>$66.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mike Mayo</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$67.00</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Manan Gosalia</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$63.00</td>
<td>$71.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Terry McEvoy</td>
<td>Stephens &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$72.00</td>
<td>$72.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Comerica. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Gaining insights, analysts provide qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of Comerica compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Delving into movements, analysts provide estimates for the future value of Comerica's stock. This analysis reveals shifts in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Assessing these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators can provide a comprehensive overview of Comerica's market position. Stay informed and make well-judged decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CMA/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Comerica analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>All You Need to Know About Comerica</h2>
With assets of around $80 billion, Comerica is primarily a relationship-based commercial bank headquartered in Dallas. In addition to Texas, Comerica's other primary geographies are California and Michigan, with locations also in Arizona and Florida and select businesses operating in several other states as well as Canada and Mexico.
<h3>Comerica: Financial Performance Dissected</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Reflecting a smaller scale, the company's market capitalization is positioned below industry averages. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
Positive Revenue Trend: Examining Comerica's financials over 3M reveals a positive narrative. The company achieved a noteworthy revenue growth rate of 5.74% as of 31 March, 2025, showcasing a substantial increase in top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the company achieved a growth rate higher than the average among peers in Financials sector.
Net Margin: Comerica's net margin is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in maintaining strong profitability. With a net margin of 19.9%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Comerica's ROE is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of 2.58%, the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): Comerica's ROA lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maximizing returns from its assets. With an ROA of 0.21%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial performance.
Debt Management: Comerica's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average at 1.05, reflecting a lower dependency on debt financing and a more conservative financial approach.
<h2>What Are Analyst Ratings?</h2>
Analyst ratings serve as essential indicators of stock performance, provided by experts in banking and financial systems. These specialists diligently analyze company financial statements, participate in conference calls, and engage with insiders to generate quarterly ratings for individual stocks.
Analysts may supplement their ratings with predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, offering investors a more comprehensive outlook. However, investors should be mindful that analysts, like any human, can have subjective perspectives influencing their forecasts.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantag">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

The Analyst Verdict: Comerica In The Eyes Of 16 Experts

10 analysts have shared their evaluations of Huntington Bancshares (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HBAN#NASDAQ">HBAN</a>) during the recent three months, expressing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.
The table below summarizes their recent ratings, showcasing the evolving sentiments within the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
In the assessment of 12-month price targets, analysts unveil insights for Huntington Bancshares, presenting an average target of $17.85, a high estimate of $20.00, and a low estimate of $16.00. Experiencing a 7.66% decline, the current average is now lower than the previous average price target of $19.33. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747828845_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Analyzing Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Breakdown</h2>
An in-depth analysis of recent analyst actions unveils how financial experts perceive Huntington Bancshares. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>David Chiaverini</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brian Foran</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$17.00</td>
<td>$21.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Karl Shepard</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$18.00</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Konrad</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$17.00</td>
<td>$18.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Terry McEvoy</td>
<td>Stephens &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$16.50</td>
<td>$16.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Long</td>
<td>Raymond James</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Strong Buy</td>
<td>$18.00</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Dietrich</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$16.00</td>
<td>$18.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Keith Horowitz</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$18.00</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Manan Gosalia</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David George</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$18.00</td>
<td>$18.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts frequently update their recommendations based on evolving market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Huntington Bancshares. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts unravel qualitative evaluations for stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings offer insights into expectations for the relative performance of Huntington Bancshares compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts provide insights into price targets, offering estimates for the future value of Huntington Bancshares's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Navigating through these analyst evaluations alongside other financial indicators can contribute to a holistic understanding of Huntington Bancshares's market standing. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/HBAN/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Huntington Bancshares analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Discovering Huntington Bancshares: A Closer Look</h2>
Huntington is a regional US bank with around $200 billion in assets (as of 2024) and has a large presence, particularly in the Midwestern market. It offers a full suite of consumer deposit and lending services, along with commercial services focused on payments, investment management, capital markets, equipment financing, treasury management, and other common banking services.
<h3>Breaking Down Huntington Bancshares's Financial Performance</h3>
Market Capitalization: Positioned above industry average, the company's market capitalization underscores its superiority in size, indicative of a strong market presence.
Revenue Growth: Huntington Bancshares's revenue growth over a period of 3M has been noteworthy. As of 31 March, 2025, the company achieved a revenue growth rate of approximately 9.46%. This indicates a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Financials sector, the company faces challenges, achieving a growth rate lower than the average among peers.
Net Margin: Huntington Bancshares's net margin lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maintaining strong profitability. With a net margin of 26.04%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Huntington Bancshares's ROE stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROE of 2.76%, the company demonstrates effective use of equity capital and strong financial performance.
Return on Assets (ROA): The company's ROA is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 0.24%, the company may need to address challenges in generating satisfactory returns from its assets.
Debt Management: Huntington Bancshares's debt-to-equity ratio stands notably higher than the industry average, reaching 1.01. This indicates a heavier reliance on borrowed funds, raising concerns about financial leverage.
<h2>The Significance of Analyst Ratings Explained</h2>
Benzinga tracks 150 analyst firms and reports on their stock expectations. Analysts typically arrive at their conclusions by predicting how much money a company will make in the future, usually the upcoming five years, and how risky or predictable that company's revenue streams are.
Analysts attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish their ratings on stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter or whenever the company has a major update.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantag">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

HBAN

What 10 Analyst Ratings Have To Say About Huntington Bancshares

Alphabet Inc.'s (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOGL#NASDAQ">GOOGL</a>) (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOG#NASDAQ">GOOG</a>) Robotaxi Waymo has announced it reached the 10 million paid Robotaxi rides milestone, doubling its lifetime total in a period of 5 months.
What Happened: The company shared a video on the social media platform X to commemorate the achievement on Tuesday.
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter"> 
<div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">The Waymo Driver's officially served over 10 MILLION paid rides! &#x1f389; Huge thanks to our riders for being an integral part of this journey, and to our teams for continuing to redefine what's possible. &#x2728; <a href="https://t.co/OkYXrmziok">pic.twitter.com/OkYXrmziok</a>
&mdash; Waymo (@Waymo) <a href="https://twitter.com/Waymo/status/1924931187274826077?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 20, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The 10 million paid rides include major U.S. cities where the company operates its services, like Austin, Los Angeles, Phoenix and San Francisco. Waymo CEO Tekedra Mawakana spoke about the milestone at Google's I/O Developer Conference. "These are all paid trips, and they represent people who are really integrating Waymo Driver into their everyday lives," Mawakana shared.   Why It Matters: The autonomous taxi company announced its expansion into previously untapped areas in California, including San Jose, as Waymo received regulatory approval from the CPUC.    Waymo had also recently shared that the company completed <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/04/45001569/waymo-announces-250000-weekly-paid-rides-across-four-us-cities-sundar-pichai-says-personal-ownership-an-option-in-the-future">over 250,000 paid robotaxi rides</a> in a week in all of its cities, with the company also<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/equities/25/04/45090602/google-backed-waymo-and-toyota-forge-strategic-partnership-to-bring-autonomous-driving-tech-to-personally-owned-vehicles"> announcing a partnership </a>with Toyota Motor Corp. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TM#NYSE">TM</a>), which would focus on making self-driving tech for personal ownership. Elsewhere, Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSLA#NASDAQ">TSLA</a>) CEO Elon Musk says that the <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/05/45529030/elon-musk-confirms-tesla-robotaxi-launch-is-on-track-for-next-month-these-things-happen-slowly-but-then-all-at-once">Robotaxi launch in June</a> will see 10 vehicles on the road in the first week. However, it could be ramped up to over 1,000 autonomous driving vehicles a couple of months after June's launch. Price Action: GOOGL gained 0.47% in Pre-Market trading, currently valued at $164.75, according to<a href="http://pro.benzinga.com"> Benzinga Pro</a> data. Check out more of Benzinga&#8217;s Future Of Mobility coverage by<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/mobility"> following this link.</a> Read Next: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/05/45511328/ross-gerber-slams-teslas-fsd-technology-ahead-of-robotaxi-launch-maintains-bearish-views-on-elon-musks-company-after-dumping-10-stake-in-q1-2025">Ross Gerber Slams Tesla's FSD Technology Ahead Of Robotaxi Launch, Maintains Bearish Views On Elon Musk's EV Giant After Dumping 10% Stake in Q1</a></figcaption></figure>

Tech

GOOG

GOOGL

TSLA

Tesla Robotaxi Rival Waymo Reaches 10 Million Paid Rides Milestone As Self-Driving Cars Step Into The Spotlight

BOK Financial (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BOKF#NASDAQ">BOKF</a>) has been analyzed by 8 analysts in the last three months, revealing a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish.
The table below provides a concise overview of recent ratings by analysts, offering insights into the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and drawing comparisons with the preceding months for a holistic perspective.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The 12-month price targets assessed by analysts reveal further insights, featuring an average target of $110.25, a high estimate of $124.00, and a low estimate of $100.00. A negative shift in sentiment is evident as analysts have decreased the average price target by 8.64%. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747828830_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Analyzing Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Breakdown</h2>
The perception of BOK Financial by financial experts is analyzed through recent analyst actions. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>David Chiaverini</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$105.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jon Arfstrom</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$104.00</td>
<td>$119.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Peter Winter</td>
<td>DA Davidson</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$114.00</td>
<td>$122.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matt Olney</td>
<td>Stephens &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$110.00</td>
<td>$124.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matt Olney</td>
<td>Stephens &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$124.00</td>
<td>$124.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Timur Braziler</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jared Shaw</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$110.00</td>
<td>$115.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jared Shaw</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$115.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to BOK Financial. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Delving into assessments, analysts assign qualitative values, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings communicate expectations for the relative performance of BOK Financial compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Understanding forecasts, analysts offer estimates for BOK Financial's future value. Examining the current and prior targets provides insight into analysts' changing expectations.</li>
</ul>
Navigating through these analyst evaluations alongside other financial indicators can contribute to a holistic understanding of BOK Financial's market standing. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/BOKF/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on BOK Financial analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Get to Know BOK Financial Better</h2>
BOK Financial Corp is a financial institution in Oklahoma, and it provides a comprehensive range of nationally competitive financial products and services. Its operating segments consist of commercial banking, consumer banking, and wealth management. The company has various products and services, including cash management services, loans and deposits, fiduciary and insurance services, mortgage banking, and brokerage and trading services. It generates maximum revenue from the commercial banking segment. Its commercial banking segment includes lending, treasury and cash management services, and customer risk management products to small businesses, middle market, and larger commercial customers.
<h3>Understanding the Numbers: BOK Financial's Finances</h3>
Market Capitalization: With restricted market capitalization, the company is positioned below industry averages. This reflects a smaller scale relative to peers.
Revenue Growth: Over the 3M period, BOK Financial showcased positive performance, achieving a revenue growth rate of 10.34% as of 31 March, 2025. This reflects a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Financials sector, the company faces challenges, achieving a growth rate lower than the average among peers.
Net Margin: BOK Financial's net margin lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maintaining strong profitability. With a net margin of 23.93%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): BOK Financial's ROE is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of 2.09%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Return on Assets (ROA): BOK Financial's ROA lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maximizing returns from its assets. With an ROA of 0.24%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial performance.
Debt Management: BOK Financial's debt-to-equity ratio stands notably higher than the industry average, reaching 0.56. This indicates a heavier reliance on borrowed funds, raising concerns about financial leverage.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: Simplified</h2>
Benzinga tracks 150 analyst firms and reports on their stock expectations. Analysts typically arrive at their conclusions by predicting how much money a company will make in the future, usually the upcoming five years, and how risky or predictable that company's revenue streams are.
Analysts attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish their ratings on stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter or whenever the company has a major update.
Analysts may supplement their ratings with predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, offering investors a more comprehensive outlook. However, investors should be mindful that analysts, like any human, can have subjective perspectives influencing their forecasts.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantag">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

BOKF

What Analysts Are Saying About BOK Financial Stock

6 analysts have shared their evaluations of Cullen/Frost Bankers (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CFR#NYSE">CFR</a>) during the recent three months, expressing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.
The table below offers a condensed view of their recent ratings, showcasing the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The 12-month price targets assessed by analysts reveal further insights, featuring an average target of $128.5, a high estimate of $141.00, and a low estimate of $105.00. Observing a downward trend, the current average is 6.03% lower than the prior average price target of $136.75. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747828819_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Exploring Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Overview</h2>
The standing of Cullen/Frost Bankers among financial experts becomes clear with a thorough analysis of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>David Chiaverini</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Underperform</td>
<td>$105.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Karl Shepard</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$140.00</td>
<td>$147.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matt Olney</td>
<td>Stephens &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$141.00</td>
<td>$138.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jared Shaw</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$135.00</td>
<td>$130.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jared Shaw</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$130.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Manan Gosalia</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$132.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts frequently update their recommendations based on evolving market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Cullen/Frost Bankers. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Offering insights into predictions, analysts assign qualitative values, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Cullen/Frost Bankers compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Understanding forecasts, analysts offer estimates for Cullen/Frost Bankers's future value. Examining the current and prior targets provides insight into analysts' changing expectations.</li>
</ul>
Understanding these analyst evaluations alongside key financial indicators can offer valuable insights into Cullen/Frost Bankers's market standing. Stay informed and make well-considered decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CFR/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Cullen/Frost Bankers analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Delving into Cullen/Frost Bankers's Background</h2>
Cullen/Frost is a regional US bank with around $50 billion in assets (as of 2024 year-end), and it focuses exclusively on the Texas market. The bank has deep expertise in this market. It has implemented a relationship-based approach to banking that has garnered a strong market share in San Antonio. Cullen/Frost is also expanding into Houston, Dallas, and Austin market regions through branch openings. The bank's sweet spot is small to medium-size Texas-based commercial clients.
<h3>Unraveling the Financial Story of Cullen/Frost Bankers</h3>
Market Capitalization: Indicating a reduced size compared to industry averages, the company's market capitalization poses unique challenges.
Positive Revenue Trend: Examining Cullen/Frost Bankers's financials over 3M reveals a positive narrative. The company achieved a noteworthy revenue growth rate of 7.74% as of 31 March, 2025, showcasing a substantial increase in top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Financials sector, the company faces challenges, achieving a growth rate lower than the average among peers.
Net Margin: Cullen/Frost Bankers's net margin falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of 27.36%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Cullen/Frost Bankers's ROE excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 3.83%. This signifies robust financial management and efficient use of shareholder equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): Cullen/Frost Bankers's ROA stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROA of 0.28%, the company demonstrates effective utilization of assets and strong financial performance.
Debt Management: Cullen/Frost Bankers's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of 0.06.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: Simplified</h2>
Analysts work in banking and financial systems and typically specialize in reporting for stocks or defined sectors. Analysts may attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter.
Beyond their standard evaluations, some analysts contribute predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, furnishing investors with additional guidance. Users of analyst ratings should be mindful that this specialized advice is shaped by human perspectives and may be subject to variability.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Breaking Down Cullen/Frost Bankers: 6 Analysts Share Their Views

Jefferies analyst David Chiaverini initiates coverage on Columbia Banking System (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/COLB#NASDAQ">COLB</a>) with a Hold rating and announces Price Target of $27.

COLB

Jefferies Initiates Coverage On Columbia Banking System with Hold Rating, Announces Price Target of $27

SGMA

Trading Halt: Halted at 7:57:50 a.m. ET - Trading Halt: Halt News Pending

Ecopetrol S.A. ((BVC: ECOPETROL, NYSE:<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/EC#NYSE">EC</a>) announces that it executed an asset purchase purchase agreement with Statkraft European Wind and Solar Holding, AS ("Statkraft") on May 20, 2025, for the potential acquisition of its portfolio in Colombia. This portfolio includes one company dedicated to the development and operation of solar and wind assets, six special purpose entities owning solar projects (614 MW), and three special purpose entities owning wind projects (750 MW) (the "Portfolio"). The agreement is subject to the fulfillment of conditions precedent and other legal requirements, which, once met, is intended to allow Ecopetrol S.A. to acquire the Portfolio of up to 1.3 GW.
The companies are owned by Statkraft's subsidiaries: Enerfín Sociedad de Energía S.L.U and Enerfin Enervento Exterior S.L.
The Portfolio's &nbsp;projects are located in the departments of La Guajira, Sucre, Córdoba, Caldas, and Magdalena.
If completed, this acquisition would represent significant progress toward Ecopetrol S.A.'s decarbonization and energy transition goals, particularly the target of incorporating 900 MW of renewable self-generation capacity by 2025, in line with its 2040 Strategy. Additionally, the transaction would support the generation of low-emission energy under competitive conditions for the Ecopetrol Group's self-consumption, reducing exposure to spot market purchases and contributing to the diversification of the company's energy matrix.
Ecopetrol S.A. reaffirms its commitment to the country's energy future through the integration of renewable energy projects into its operations.

Ecopetrol Executes Asset Purchase Agreement With Statkraft European Wind And Solar Holding For Potential Acquisition Of Its Portfolio In Colombia

<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="900" height="600" src="https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21071014/YY.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-13211" srcset="https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21071014/YY.jpeg 900w,https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21071014/YY-300x200.jpeg 300w,https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21071014/YY-768x512.jpeg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px" /></figure>
The shoemaker's profit fell 24% in the first quarter on falling margins, as it continues taking preemptive hedging measures against geopolitical risk
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Key Takeaways:</h4>
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Leading shoemaker Yue Yuen's revenue grew 1.3% in the first quarter, but its profit dropped 24.2%</li>
<li>Rising labor costs in Southeast Asia are squeezing the company's margins as it diversifies beyond China to hedge against geopolitical risk</li>
</ul>
"Made-in-China" sneakers are continuing to trek across the Pacific to U.S. consumers, even as key changes in the supply chains behind their trans-continental journey shift dramatically. Despite receiving some temporary relief in the China-U.S. tariff wars from the two countries' recent trade deal, shoe giant&nbsp;Yue Yuen Industrial&nbsp;(Holdings) Ltd.&nbsp;(0551.HK) is hardly breathing easy. The company recently reported its gross margin and profit both fell sharply&nbsp;<a href="https://www1.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/2025/0512/2025051200601.pdf">in the first quarter</a>, highlighting some of the challenges original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) are facing as their supply chains shift around them.
Yue Yuen, whose customers include global giants like Nike, Adidas and Puma, managed to eke out some revenue growth in the first quarter, with the figure up 1.3% year-on-year to $2.03 billion. But its profit sprinted downward, sinking 24.2% to $75.8 million. Its gross and operating profit margins also suffered, with the former falling by 2.2 percentage points year-on-year to 22.9% in the quarter, and the latter down by a similar 1.9 percentage points to 5.4%.
The company blamed escalating turbulence in the global economy for its rising unit costs, and added its overall efficiency is taking a hit from uneven capacity utilization across different factories, surging labor costs and delays in a new factory opening.
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Rising costs, client conservatism</h4>
Among the many factors eroding its margins, rising labor costs in countries such as Indonesia and Vietnam are having some of the most significant impact on Yue Yuen. The company's Indonesian factories raised wages earlier this year, according to a BofA Securities note. Despite gradually passing on the higher costs to clients in the second quarter, the company's gross profit margin will remain under pressure in the near term and is expected to stay in 18% to 19% range, down significantly from 2024 levels, BofA said.
Yue Yuen's second-quarter orders have been relatively stable so far, BofA added, but management is concerned about shipments falling year-on-year in the third quarter due to both a high base from last year and clients becoming more conservative with their inventory strategies. That could dampen the company's momentum over the short term as its clients become more cautious in their ordering at a time when demand from the important China market has been slow to recover.
The company is also facing external pressure driven by geopolitical uncertainties. Facing such headwinds, Yue Yuen began redistributing its capacity as early as 2018 in a bid to diversify its manufacturing base, with a particular focus on goods bound for the U.S. The company has lowered the share of its products made in China for export to the U.S. from 85% at an earlier peak to just 15% now. On a geographic basis, shoes produced in Indonesia, Vietnam and China accounted for 54%, 31% and 11% of its total shipments in 2024, respectively, showing the center of gravity for its manufacturing has shifted to Southeast Asia.&nbsp;
The reality is that OEMs like Yue Yuen have always been "nomads" when it comes to where they set up their shops. The company was founded in 1988, but its parent,&nbsp;Pou Chen Corp.&nbsp;(9904.TW), has roots dating back to 1969 with its establishment in Taiwan's Zhanghua county. It started out producing and exporting rubber shoes and later shifted its focus to designing and manufacturing sneakers and casual footwear.
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Seeking profits while diversifying risk</h4>
In the 1980s, as Taiwan tightened its land and environmental protection laws and regulations and local labor cost rose, Pou Chen looked for new, more cost-effective places to produce. It initially set its sights on Southeast Asia, but later pivoted to the Chinese mainland as the government began allowing private enterprises and made other market-oriented reforms. It was part of a larger tide of Taiwan companies that "moved west" to the mainland.
Officially based in Hong Kong, Yue Yuen went public on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in 1992 and expanded into the mainland as a Hong Kong-funded company. It built shoe factories in nearby Pearl River Delta cities such as Dongguan and Huizhou in Guangdong province, and in Kunshan, near Shanghai, in Jiangsu province. As its output grew and it became more active on the mainland, Yue Yuen quickly expanded by landing premier brands such as Nike and Adidas as their most important OEM partner in Asia. At its peak, it was churning out more than 300 million pairs of athletic shoes every year.
The company has a publicly listed subsidiary,&nbsp;Pou Sheng International&nbsp;(3813.HK), in charge of the retail sales and distribution of sportswear products on the mainland and in Southeast Asia. In terms of division of duties, Yue Yuen is responsible for manufacturing, while Pou Sheng handles sales. The pair have built out a manufacturing and sales network spanning China, Vietnam, Indonesia and Cambodia.
While its geographic diversification may help to protect it against geopolitical risks, the move is unlikely to produce cost advantages in the near term. To the contrary, it might lead to higher operating costs and lower efficiency as new facilities ramp up and labor costs rise. Other risks remain as well, including changing labor market conditions and tariff dynamics in Southeast Asia, as well as unclear prospects for China's economic recovery and growing conservatism among its clients.
Yue Yuen's stock has hovered in the HK$12 to HK$18 range for most of the last five years and currently trades at feeble price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of around 6.5 times, well behind peers like&nbsp;Stella International&nbsp;(1836.HK) at 10.3 times, and&nbsp;Rich Peace&nbsp;(9910.TW) at 20.8 times, speaking to concerns about its diversification pains and broader outlook.
Despite solid fundamentals and strong connections with established brands, the company seems to lack growth potential at the moment – especially on its bottom line – and has yet to reveal any new steps it might take beyond waiting for market conditions to improve and orders to increase. While it's certainly no high-tech maven, perhaps it might explore breakthroughs with digital transformation, automated manufacturing or technological upgrades to win back investors.&nbsp;

Asia

Global

Opinion

Yue Yuen Stumbles On High Labor Costs, Geopolitical Uncertainty

Despite the overvalued nature of the stock based on its price-to-earnings metric, Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSLA#NASDAQ">TSLA</a>)&#8217;s CEO, Elon Musk, has defended the company&#8217;s growth, citing its stock prices, shrugging off the fundamental worries surrounding the carmaker as highlighted by experts.
What Happened: During the Qatar Economic Forum on Monday, Musk highlighted that Tesla&#8217;s share price was the measure of its business&#8217;s success. 
&#8220;You can just look at the stock price if you want the best inside information,&#8221; he said as per <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/news/elon-musk-tells-investors-teslas-stock-price-shows-company-is-in-a-good-place-dont-worry-about-it-143940828.html">a</a> Yahoo Finance report.
&#8220;The stock market analysts have that, and a stock wouldn&#8217;t be trading near all-time highs if it was not, if things weren&#8217;t in good shape. They&#8217;re fine, don&#8217;t worry about it.&#8221;
According to <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/dashboard">Benzinga Pro</a>, Tesla shares are trading at a price nearly 158.730 times its 2026 earnings. At the same time, the average forward price-to-earnings of its peers stood at 25.75 times, implying that Tesla was 6.16 times more expensive than its industry's average.
However, Gordon Johnson, the CEO and founder of GLJ Research, countered Musk&#8217;s statement with examples. In an X post, he highlighted that &#8220;If: high stock price = good underlying business fundamentals, then WorldComm + HealthSouth + Enron + Tyco + etc. would never have gone bankrupt.&#8221;
He explained that the stock prices were simply a reflection of a stock&#8217;s demand, which could be influenced by factors like CEO comments and pump-and-dump Wall Street analysts.
Taking a dig at the Federal Reserve and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Johnson further stated that the Fed&#8217;s purchase of Treasuries by printing money was also a reason for the artificially created demand for stocks.
&#8220;Were the Federal Reserve to immediately pull out all the money it printed into existence from COVID, we&#8217;d QUICKLY have REAL price discovery in stocks,&#8221; he warned.
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter"> 
<div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">I was going to comment on this&#8230; but <a href="https://twitter.com/FredericLambert?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@FredericLambert</a> NAILS it. If: high stock price = good underlying business fundamentals, then WorldComm + HealthSouth + Enron + Tyco + etc. would never have gone bankrupt. Stock price simply = demand for the stock (and demand for a stock can… <a href="https://t.co/LmKs67YUH1">https://t.co/LmKs67YUH1</a>
&mdash; Gordon Johnson (@GordonJohnson19) <a href="https://twitter.com/GordonJohnson19/status/1924865321078276238?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 20, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
</figure>
As of the <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/04/44937440/tesla-q1-earnings-highlights-revenue-miss-eps-miss-tariff-landscape-and-changing-political-sentiment-cloud-guidance">first quarter,</a> Tesla&#8217;s revenue fell 9% year-over-year to $19.34 billion, missing the Street&#8217;s consensus estimate of $21.35 billion, and its EPS declined 40% year-over-year to 27 cents, which was below the 31 cents consensus.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/25/05/45533521/charlie-munger-once-said-the-first-rule-of-compounding-is-to-never-interrupt-it-unnecessarily-now-hi">Charlie Munger Once Said, &#8216;The First Rule Of Compounding Is To Never Interrupt It Unnecessarily&#8217; — Now His Wisdom Rings True As The S&amp;P 500 Surges 220% Over 10 Years</a>
Why It Matters: When compared to a few of its industry peers, Tesla had the highest trailing P/E ratio among them.
<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"> 
<table class="has-fixed-layout">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Stocks</td>
<td>Trailing P/E</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSLA#NASDAQ">TSLA</a>)</td>
<td>196.469</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Toyota Motor Corp. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TM#NYSE">TM</a>)</td>
<td>0.05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>General Motors Co. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GM#NYSE">GM</a>)</td>
<td>6.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ford Motor Co. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/F#NYSE">F</a>)</td>
<td>8.54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Honda Motor Co Ltd. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HMC#NYSE">HMC</a>)</td>
<td>0.06</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</figure>
However, when compared to the forward P/E ratios of the Magnificent 7 stocks, Tesla shares remain the most expensive with the highest ratio of forward price-to-earnings in comparison with its industry average.
<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"> 
<table class="has-fixed-layout">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Stocks</td>
<td>Forward P/E</td>
<td>Industry Average</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tesla Inc. </td>
<td>158.73</td>
<td>25.75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nvidia Corporation (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>)</td>
<td>31.153</td>
<td>37.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>)</td>
<td>28.818</td>
<td>20.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>)</td>
<td>30.488</td>
<td>81.74</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>)</td>
<td>31.646</td>
<td>32.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOG#NASDAQ">GOOG</a>)</td>
<td>17.575</td>
<td>125.77</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Meta Platforms Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>)</td>
<td>25.189</td>
<td>125.77</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</figure>
TSLA shares were down 9.35% year-to-date, but it has returned by 51.13% just in the last month. The shares were up 84.26% over the year. On Tuesday, it ended 0.51% lower and advanced 0.015% in after-hours and on Wednesday, it was up 0.46%.
Benzinga Edge Stock Rankings shows that Tesla had a stronger price trend over the short, medium, and long term. Its momentum ranking was solid, however, its value ranking was poor at the 8.57th percentile. The details of other metrics are <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-2#:~:text=Turn%20Market%20Chaos,when%20markets%20rebound">available here</a>. 
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-2#:~:text=Turn%20Market%20Chaos,when%20markets%20rebound"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="143" src="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21034750/EDGE-TESLA-1024x143.png" alt="" class="wp-image-922346" srcset="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21034750/EDGE-TESLA-1024x143.png 1024w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21034750/EDGE-TESLA-300x42.png 300w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21034750/EDGE-TESLA-768x107.png 768w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21034750/EDGE-TESLA.png 1224w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure>
The SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SPY#NYSE">SPY</a>) and Invesco QQQ Trust ETF (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/QQQ#NASDAQ">QQQ</a>), which track the S&amp;P 500 index and Nasdaq 100 index, respectively, fell in premarket on Wednesday. The SPY was down 0.70% to $588.69, while the QQQ declined 0.76% to $516.31, according to <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/dashboard">Benzinga Pro</a> data.
Read Next:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/general/market-summary/25/05/45515900/mstrs-new-bitcoin-accounting-standard-to-drive-financial-swings-make-earnings-volatile-says-expert-after-lawsuit-hits-strategy">MSTR&#8217;s New Bitcoin Accounting Standard To Drive &#8216;Financial Swings,&#8217; Make Earnings &#8216;Volatile,&#8217; Says Expert After Lawsuit Hits Strategy</a></li>
</ul>
Image Via Shutterstock

Analyst Color

Earnings

Equities

Market Summary

Broad U.S. Equity ETFs

Futures

Federal Reserve

ETFs

General

AAPL

AMZN

MSFT

NVDA

Tesla Is 6X More Expensive Than Its Peers And The Most Overvalued Mag 7 Stock: Gordon Johnson Questions Fundamentals As Elon Musk Shrugs Off Concerns

Jefferies analyst David Chiaverini initiates coverage on Comerica (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CMA#NYSE">CMA</a>) with a Underperform rating and announces Price Target of $47.

Jefferies Initiates Coverage On Comerica with Underperform Rating, Announces Price Target of $47

WIIM

V.F. Corporation shares are trading lower following the company's Q4 earnings report. The company slightly missed revenue estimates and guided for a Q1 revenue decline of 3-5%.

OpenAI&#8216;s Texas-based data center has reportedly secured an additional $11.6 billion in funding.
What Happened: The funding, a combination&nbsp;of debt and equity, would be used to expand the data center from two to eight buildings.&nbsp;According to Crusoe, this will bring the project&#8217;s total funding to $15 billion. Both Crusoe and the investment firm Blue Owl Capital are participating in the latest funding round, according to a report by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openai-data-center-funding-microsoft-75e879b6">The Wall Street Journal</a>&nbsp;on Wednesday.
Set to be completed next year, the data center will be OpenAI&#8217;s largest, housing up to 50,000 Nvidia (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) Blackwell chips per building for training large language models.
The development of this site in the city of Abilene is a crucial&nbsp;step in minimizing OpenAI's reliance&nbsp;on&nbsp;Microsoft Corp.&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>). OpenAI had previously relied exclusively on Microsoft for its computing power. However, last spring, OpenAI struck a deal with&nbsp;Oracle&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ORCL#NASDAQ">ORCL</a>) to use the Abilene site&nbsp;after Microsoft gave its approval.
OpenAI did not immediately respond to Benzinga&#8217;s request for comment.
SEE ALSO:&nbsp;<a href="https://benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/25/05/45533976/mr-wonderful-kevin-o-leary-says-elizabeth-warren-taking-an-un-american-position-by-challen" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mr Wonderful Kevin O&#8217;Leary Says Elizabeth Warren Taking An &#8216;Un American&#8217; Position By Challenging Crypto Law: &#8216;Bill Has Nothing To Do With Trump&#8217;</a>
Why It Matters:&nbsp;This development comes in the wake of OpenAI&#8217;s ongoing efforts to reduce its dependence on Microsoft. Earlier this month, OpenAI had <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/05/45244190/microsoft-faces-fresh-revenue-hit-as-openai-plans-to-reduce-payouts-by-2030-report">plans to cut</a> the share of revenue it pays to Microsoft by at least half by the end of the decade.
Moreover, another report suggested that the ChatGPT-maker was in <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/05/45340216/openais-ipo-ambitions-hang-in-the-balance-as-microsoft-negotiates-equity-report">high-stakes</a> negotiations with Microsoft to revise the terms of their multibillion-dollar partnership, with a key point of contention being the equity Microsoft would receive in the restructured OpenAI entity.
OpenAI plans to develop its own data center network as part of a long-term strategy. Earlier this year, CEO Sam Altman also announced a $500 billion infrastructure project called Stargate, in partnership with SoftBank and Oracle.
The new funding and expansion of the Texas data center signify a critical step in OpenAI&#8217;s strategic move towards self-reliance and its ambitious long-term infrastructure project, Stargate.
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>READ MORE:&nbsp;<a href="https://benzinga.com/25/05/45532747/a-completely-man-made-crisis-fox-news-host-comments-on-walmarts-price-hikes-due-to-trumps-tariffs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">&#8216;A Completely Man-Made Crisis&#8217;—Fox News Host Comments On Walmart&#8217;s Price Hikes Due To Trump&#8217;s Tariffs</a></li>
</ul>
Image via Shutterstock
Disclaimer:&nbsp;This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.

ORCL

Sam Altman's OpenAI Raises $11.6 Billion For Texas Data Center As It Moves To Reduce Reliance On Microsoft: Report

Jefferies analyst David Chiaverini initiates coverage on Cullen/Frost Bankers (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CFR#NYSE">CFR</a>) with a Underperform rating and announces Price Target of $105.

Jefferies Initiates Coverage On Cullen/Frost Bankers with Underperform Rating, Announces Price Target of $105

<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="900" height="600" src="https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21070741/Sunshine-0521-900x600-1.png" alt="" class="wp-image-13208" srcset="https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21070741/Sunshine-0521-900x600-1.png 900w,https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21070741/Sunshine-0521-900x600-1-300x200.png 300w,https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21070741/Sunshine-0521-900x600-1-768x512.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px" /></figure>
The insurer plans to set up a subsidiary that will run a 20 billion yuan fund investing in stocks and fixed-income instruments
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Key Takeaways:</h4>
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Sunshine's asset management unit will set up a wholly owned subsidiary that will run an investment fund using 20 billion yuan from the company's life insurance business</li>
<li>The move will allow the insurer to gain from movements in financial markets without directly exposing it to short-term volatility or bringing additional capital charges</li>
</ul>
Sunshine Insurance Group Co. Ltd.&nbsp;(6963.HK) is building a shelter in financial markets to prop up its fortunes as a cloudy economy rains on its core insurance business in China.
Last Friday, the insurer&nbsp;<a href="https://www1.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/2025/0516/2025051601071.pdf">said</a>&nbsp;its asset management unit will set up a wholly owned subsidiary that will run a 20 billion yuan ($2.8 billion) fund using money from Sunshine's life insurance business. The 10-year fund will buy stocks of Chinese companies listed in Hong Kong, Shanghai and Shenzhen, as well as fixed-income instruments. The new subsidiary will earn management and other fees from and distribute returns to Sunshine Life.
The move gives Sunshine a new channel for indirect exposure to financial markets, in addition to direct investments in stocks and bonds it already makes. Although this setup may just look like a scheme to exchange money among Sunshine's own entities, it can offer some practical benefits for the company. For one, by creating an investment vehicle this way, Sunshine won't have to take capital charges on its own balance sheet for risky assets like stocks held by the fund. This is critical as regulators are imposing increasingly stringent capital requirements on insurers.
The move also eliminates the need for Sunshine to incorporate changes in the values of the fund's investments directly into its own net profit, which can lead to painful paper-based losses during a down market. It "is conducive to reducing the impact of fluctuations in the market value of equity assets on the net profit of the company, and improving the ability of the company to invest in the capital market," Sunshine said in its disclosure.
Insurers invest premiums they collect from their policyholders to generate returns as one of their major revenue sources. Such income is particularly crucial for Sunshine right now as margins on its insurance underwriting aren't that great. The company's insurance revenue increased a little less than 7% last year to 64 billion yuan. But associated expenses erased more than 90% of that sum. And that's before accounting for other costs like fees the company paid to reinsurers. By comparison, its investment income, including paper gains and losses on assets, jumped more than 145% to 13 billion yuan.
Now, as China's frail economy makes consumers and businesses cautious about spending on non-essential items, it's becoming even more difficult for insurers like Sunshine to grow profits from their core insurance business. This makes investment income all the more important, even though such a revenue source is inevitably volatile.
To boost returns, the company would want to buy more high-risk assets. But that creates a dilemma, since doing that would raise its capital requirements and could also result in losses. By using an off-balance sheet fund, Sunshine can avoid increased capital requirements and short-term paper losses created by volatility in financial markets, though any disposal of investments at a loss would ultimately hit the company.
Insurers also have to worry about matching the durations of their investments and liabilities with their customers' requirements for funds. In an extreme case, for example, if an insurer has more money locked in long-term investments than what it needs to service its policyholders, it wouldn't be able to honor its obligations.
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Tricky investment strategies</h4>
All that means devising investment strategies for insurers can be quite tricky. Sunshine's investment portfolio is heavily focused on fixed income assets, which are typically safer than stocks. Such instruments accounted for more than 70% of its investment assets at the end of last year. A large proportion of them were government bonds, considered one of the safest assets, and most of the corporate bonds it invests in also have high credit ratings, suggesting the company is relatively conservative in its risk-taking.
By establishing a separate entity solely dedicated to operating an investment fund, Sunshine can have more leeway to dabble in risky assets that it might otherwise avoid. The 20 billion yuan the company plans to commit to the fund is not a huge amount for Sunshine. But it's not peanuts either, considering the company had 12 billion yuan in cash and cash equivalents at the end of 2024. Sunshine will provide capital for the fund in installments.
Unless the new subsidiary makes a loss, it can contribute to Sunshine's bottom line by returning any profits it makes to the company. But this plan also hints at limited opportunities for insurers to expand their real-world businesses. At the end of the day, the earmarked 20 billion yuan is large enough to fund a sizable acquisition or other initiatives that could lead to meaningful growth for Sunshine's insurance and other businesses.
Sunshine actually made an acquisition recently, but that effort may have left many scratching their heads. Last November, it agreed to buy about 40% of JC International Finance &amp; Leasing Co. Ltd., which leases equipment and other assets to small businesses in areas like manufacturing and energy conservation, for about 1.3 billion yuan.
From a business diversification perspective, that deal made sense. But the target company was barely profitable, and it's not clear if Sunshine's can change that for the better. So, whether the investment is really worthwhile is questionable, and the move also suggests that attractive acquisition targets are rare these days.
Sunshine shares have lost more than 40% of their value since the company's IPO in 2022. They currently trade at a trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 6.5 and a price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 0.47. The P/S is in line with the 0.5 for online insurer&nbsp;ZhongAn&nbsp;(6060.HK), which, however, commands a much loftier P/E ratio of 28. Among related companies, insurance distributor&nbsp;Yuanbao&nbsp;(YB.US), which went public this month in New York, trades at a lofty P/E ratio of 67 and P/S of 8.9. That could reflect investor preference for companies like Yuanbao that provide services for actual policy underwriters like Sunshine and ZhongAn.
Sunshine shares have fallen further since its investment fund announcement, indicating investors weren't impressed with the plan. For the company to shine among insurance companies in the current gloomy Chinese economy, it will need to spark better growth. Its latest move may provide some fuel for that, but it looks more like an admission that its core insurance business isn't going anywhere fast.

Insurance

Sunshine Chases Investment Income Amid Tepid Demand For Its Insurance

Jefferies analyst David Chiaverini initiates coverage on Citizens Financial Group (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CFG#NYSE">CFG</a>) with a Buy rating and announces Price Target of $50.

Jefferies Initiates Coverage On Citizens Financial Group with Buy Rating, Announces Price Target of $50

WOLF: -65% &#x7C; <a href="https://www.benzinga.com//node/45532307">Wolfspeed shares are trading lower amid reports that the company is preparing to file for bankruptcy within weeks.</a>
&nbsp;
PANW: -5% &#x7C; <a href="https://www.benzinga.com//node/45529629">Palo Alto Networks shares are trading lower following Q3 reported financial results.</a>
&nbsp;
TGT: -5% &nbsp;&#x7C; <a href="https://www.benzinga.com//node/45539024">Target shares are trading lower after the company missed Q1 earnings estimates and lowered its FY25 EPS guidance.</a>

Movers

PANW

WOLF

Market-Moving News for May 21st

Press Releases

INVESTOR ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Investigates Claims On Behalf of Investors of Fortrea Holdings Inc. - FTRE

Fortrea Announces Date for First Quarter 2025 Financial Results and Conference Call

Legal

Fortrea Named a Leader in Everest Group's Pharmacovigilance Operations PEAK Matrix® Assessment 2025

Management

Fortrea Announces CEO Stepping Down

Fortrea Reports First Quarter 2025 Results

Small Cap

Securities Fraud Investigation Into Fortrea Holdings Inc. (FTRE) Continues – Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz

Fortrea Holdings Inc. (FTRE) Investors Who Lost Money – Contact Law Offices of Howard G. Smith About Securities Fraud Investigation

Securities Fraud Investigation Into Fortrea Holdings Inc. (FTRE) Continues – Investors Who Lost Money Urged to Contact Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, a Leading Securities Fraud Law Firm

AbCellera Biologics

Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation - Common Stock

Adaptive Biotechnologies

Azenta

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Class A Common Stock

Bio-Rad Laboratories

BioLife Solutions

Bruker

Codexis

Cytek Biosciences

CryoPort

Evotec SE - American Depositary Shares each representing 1/2 of one ordinary share

Comments

Fortrea Holdings

Fortrea Holdings (FTRE) Opzioni

Fortrea Holdings (NASDAQ:FTRE) Azioni, Catena delle Opzioni

Notizie

PARTNER/COLLABORATORE

BENZINGA NEL MONDO